Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 June 9



File:Propelwater.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:29, 23 June 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Propelwater.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Product artwork - Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:54, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. I think that the principle of Ets-Hokin v. Skyy Spirits Inc. may apply here. The packaging design is predominantly functional, and any remaining creative elements are de minimis. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:30, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Hip front cover.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:29, 23 June 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Hip front cover.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Journal cover that is unlikely to be owned by the uploader. Eeekster (talk) 11:29, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. The logo is shrunk to the point where it is unrecognizable and may be de minimis. Beyond that, I don't see what is copyrightable on this cover. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:31, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Achannelnew.svg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free. -  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 18:37, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * File:Achannelnew.svg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This really is not simple text, and so cannot be considered free. It's already been deleted from Commons. J Milburn (talk) 13:05, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * While I agree, I just want to note that this file was proposed for deletion before by User:J Milburn and kept, see Possibly unfree files/2009 September 22.--Svgalbertian (talk) 15:50, 9 June 2010 (UTC)


 * This is kind of an interesting case. If this were a US company's logo, I might be persuaded that this is PD-textlogo as this Best Western logo was famously denied copyright registration, despite several appeals.  However, this logo is from Canada.  Canada has a lower threshold of originality than the U.S and provides copyright protection in some instances where the U.S. clearly would not.  Because Commons has already chosen to delete this I've edited the image description to note that this image is not eligible to be moved to commons, in case we decide to keep it. —RP88 (talk) 16:29, 9 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment. As I mentioned in an earlier WP:PUF nomination of this image, I think that PD-textlogo applies in this case. I should add that our thresholds for originality (if it differs between countries) generally follows the U.S. standards (e.g., National Portrait Gallery copyright conflicts). IronGargoyle (talk) 14:35, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:01 Subara wiki.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:29, 23 June 2010 (UTC)


 * File:01 Subara wiki.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * scan/photo/screenshot of calendar, does it qualify for pd-text or is it copyvio? IngerAlHaosului (talk) 18:34, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:01-MO Diagram in example for A and B term.PNG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:29, 23 June 2010 (UTC)


 * File:01-MO Diagram in example for A and B term.PNG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Appears to be a scan from a book, i recommended non-free rational IngerAlHaosului (talk) 18:39, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:02 Denha wiki.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:29, 23 June 2010 (UTC)


 * File:02 Denha wiki.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * see 01 Subara wiki.jpg IngerAlHaosului (talk) 18:41, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Target Tracking.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep. -  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 18:38, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * File:Target Tracking.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * possible derivative work copyvio IngerAlHaosului (talk) 18:57, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Assuming the summary is correct and this chart is adapted from a U.S. War Department field manual, then the licensing on this image is fine. It is a derivative of a public domain work since all field manuals produced by the (former) U.S. War Department are in the public domain.  —RP88 (talk) 19:03, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The chart is indeed adapted from the cited source, a government publication. It summarizes two related, but somewhat obscure, charts in the manual and adopts standard terms to make it easier for the casual reader to understand. [I also have yet to modify its caption from a "placeholder" of another image, so this might be confusing.] My goodness, but the WP Copyright Police sure are speedy! :-) Pgrig (talk) 19:41, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I now note that somehow a link to the actual manual got added to my description, so I suppose RP88 can go see the cited source for him/herself. I am a new guy on the WP block, and this is my first challenged image upload. Pgrig (talk) 19:48, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Pgrig, I'm not sure I understand the remark you made about me.  I'm the one who added the link and made the second comment on this listing.  This image was listed by IngerAlHaosului. —RP88 (talk) 19:53, 9 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Yes, RP88, I mis-spoke. :-) I'm still not sure how you found the on-line reference (very impressive!), and I was commenting that someone who wanted to see the original (public domain) charts I am attempting to adapt could now easily go check them out. Does it seem my image (now properly captioned and worked into the text) is OK now, and if so, does someone other than me remove the warning on it? As I said, I haven't been through this process before. Thanks. Pgrig (talk) 20:41, 9 June 2010 (UTC)


 * I think this image is fine. Don't remove the puf tag from the image description yourself.  An admin will close this discussion (in about a week or so), at which time he or she will either remove the tag and place a note on the talk page referencing this discussion, or, if warranted by the discussion, delete the image. —RP88 (talk) 22:31, 9 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks again for the education, RP88. As usual, now that I've spent a little time poking around the related WP subject matter (in this case (c) disputes), I see how complex things can get, quickly.... I think I have now finished the article accompanying my challenged graphic, which I believe benefits from it. If you have a few minutes to spare, I'd be curious to know if you can understand Coast Artillery fire control from what's written there or have any suggestions. If so, please put them up on my Talk page. New kids love feedback.... Pgrig (talk) 13:48, 10 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep. Derivative work of a U.S. Public domain source may be licensed as the creator sees fit. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:44, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.