Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 10



File:Jim Lord in concert 2008 copy.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep. Uploader makes a reasonable, good-faith claim to authorship. Kafziel Complaint Department 20:27, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * File:Jim Lord in concert 2008 copy.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Promotional photo of a notable individual. Likely copyrighted.  No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 03:44, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Keith McDowell's Art Studio.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep. Uploader makes a reasonable, good-faith claim to authorship. Kafziel Complaint Department 20:32, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * File:Keith McDowell's Art Studio.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Promotional photo of a notable individual. Likely copyrighted.  No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 03:47, 10 March 2010 (UTC)


 * I am the artist. What proof do you require? (Keith McDowell Artist (talk) 19:23, 10 March 2010 (UTC))
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wright Baxter.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep. Uploader makes a reasonable, good-faith claim to authorship. Kafziel Complaint Department 20:32, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * File:Wright Baxter.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Studio style photo/drawing of a notable individual. Likely copyrighted.  No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 03:47, 10 March 2010 (UTC)


 * I am the artist. What proof do you require? (Keith McDowell Artist (talk) 19:23, 10 March 2010 (UTC))
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Anne Baxter.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep. Uploader makes a reasonable, good-faith claim to authorship. Kafziel Complaint Department 20:32, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * File:Anne Baxter.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * 2-D artwork of some kind. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 03:48, 10 March 2010 (UTC)


 * I am the artist. What proof do you require? (Keith McDowell Artist (talk) 19:21, 10 March 2010 (UTC))
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AlbatrosL75.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:41, 3 April 2010 (UTC)


 * File:AlbatrosL75.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The Albatros L 75 was not built until 1928; it is therefore not possible for this photo to have been published in the United States prior to 1923. Furthermore, the website given as the source is notorious for its disregard for copyright; text throughout the site is taken verbatim from various aviation reference books; there's no reason to believe that they own the copyright to this image. Rlandmann (talk) 08:36, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

I think I misread it intially as 1920. You're probably right, but in my view it may be an irreplaceable image so the license should be changed. ‡ Himalayan ‡ ΨMonastery 12:57, 10 March 2010 (UTC)


 * In practice, that's going to be hard. Because we've got this photo from an unreliable source, we can't know who took it or when or where it was first published -- the stuff that we actually need to know to license this properly. I also don't think that "fair use" applies here, since it would indeed be possible to create a free image that would "serve the same encyclopedic purpose". An image of a 3D model or photo of a physical model would convey the same information to the reader about the plane's layout and design that this photo does. --Rlandmann (talk) 16:25, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Westfield State College Dining Commons.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:41, 3 April 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Westfield State College Dining Commons.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Taken from http://www.veluxusa.com/Consumer/Get_Inspired/Case_gallery/commercial_cases/westfield_college. Exactly the same dimensions as source photo. No license specified and no fair use rationale. Voceditenore (talk) 15:46, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:THIRANOTTAM.pdf

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:41, 3 April 2010 (UTC)


 * File:THIRANOTTAM.pdf ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * I suspect that a person posting a scan from a book or a magazine is not its copyright holder, as claimed. —Largo Plazo (talk) 19:51, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Daksh.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:41, 3 April 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Daksh.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Uploader makes some vague claim of ownership, and states it is licensed for worhsip only. The same image appears at http://haridwar.nic.in/photogallery.htm and checking previous versions of the site, this image predates the upload date on this file.  I suspect that the uploader does not have the requisite permission as claimed. Whpq (talk) 22:10, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.