Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 11



File:Ljubljanachristmas.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:34, 2 April 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Ljubljanachristmas.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Tineye found one instance of this image on a Slovenian photographer's blog (here) which has since been moved so unfortunately I can't find the actual image on the site anymore. The uploader (User:Patrignani090), though, is known for uploading images from random websites and claiming that they are his work (see his talk page and contributions). There were also problems with "his" contributions on Slovene Wikipedia and Commons. — Yerpo Eh? 08:56, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Bogotá, Cundinamallrca, Colombia.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:34, 2 April 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Bogotá, Cundinamallrca, Colombia.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Jumamuba is a serial copyright violator, so this discussion includes most others uploaded by Jumamuba as well that do not already have their own deletion discussions. (On another note I suspect that he has a sockpuppet.) I have been told at the village pump that it is best to have a deletion discussion for mass deletions since it might be that not all of the photos are copyright violations. However, remember that the uploader is currently on a two-week block, and that nearly all of his photos look professionally taken. Many also are at low resolution, suggesting that they were copied from the web. Some are in the BMP file format, but with a .jpg extension, this suggests that the uploader likely does not have the computer knowledge to resize his own photos, meaning that it is likely that only the high resolution photos have even a small chance of being his. PleaseStand (talk) 01:54, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Please see Possibly unfree files/2010 March 8 for two of Jumamuba's uploads that are already in discussion. PleaseStand (talk) 02:12, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Tineye.com show this image in a couple dozen places; very unlikely this person is the copyright holder. — BQZip01 —  talk 05:04, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I have set up a table of his file uploads. Remember that when you can definitely tell that an image is a copyvio, check for copies on Commons ("file links" section) as others have transferred some of his images to Commons, taking the false licensing information with them. PleaseStand (talk) 12:08, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Chart completed, mostly according to TinEye results, but also according to my own findings and others' as well. 8 9 of his images are almost certainly copyvios ("strong yes"). 17 16 were others copied from other web sites ("yes"), and 20 others have no TinEye results or are old enough to be public domain. Again, if you delete an image, please check Commons as well to make sure that they delete the image. PleaseStand (talk) 02:44, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:PinkPyjamaRay.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep, solution applied. After Midnight 0001 20:55, 3 April 2010 (UTC)


 * File:PinkPyjamaRay.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Gabrielle Ray was an English stage actress, no reason given that this would be PD-US. Kostelca (talk) 04:12, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Image from 1905. Fixed tag to  — BQZip01 —  talk 05:05, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep for the reasons stated by BQZip01. -- Ssilvers (talk) 05:50, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:GabrielleRay1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep, solution applied. After Midnight 0001 20:55, 3 April 2010 (UTC)


 * File:GabrielleRay1.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Gabrielle Ray was an English stage actress, other Philco Series postcards published in the UK, no reason given that this would be PD-US. Kostelca (talk) 04:28, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Image from 1907. Fixed tag to  — BQZip01 —  talk 05:06, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep for the reasons stated by BQZip01. -- Ssilvers (talk) 05:51, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ray-g013.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep, solution applied. After Midnight 0001 20:56, 3 April 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Ray-g013.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Gabrielle Ray was an English stage actress, similar Rotary Photographic Series postcard published in the UK (e.g. 1, 2, 3), no reason given that this would be PD-US. Kostelca (talk) 04:39, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Image from 1909. Fixed tag to  — BQZip01 —  talk 05:08, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep for the reasons stated by BQZip01. -- Ssilvers (talk) 05:51, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Sultan Bahoo shrine.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:34, 2 April 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Sultan Bahoo shrine.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Delete uploader claims this as his own work with a PD tag, something he has done for several other images that have been deleted. This panoramino source clearly shows an "all right reserved" copyright and the author shows no relationship to the uploader. ww2censor (talk) 05:12, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Conditional Delete Contingent upon no link being drawn between the uploader and the other site. — BQZip01 —  talk 05:17, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: this editor has uploaded another panoramino image sourced to a different panoramino user. ww2censor (talk) 05:40, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Sultan Bahoo shrine3.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:34, 2 April 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Sultan Bahoo shrine3.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Delete: image is again claimed to be own and tagged PD but page is sourced from here which is likely copyright even though there is no copyright notice on the source page. Uploader's history of unsourced copyright images indicates his claims are false. ww2censor (talk) 05:31, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mountain house.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  17:54, 13 March 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Mountain house.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * No evidence license is valid Eeekster (talk) 05:39, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Peer meher ali.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:34, 2 April 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Peer meher ali.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Delete: Image is found on several webpages, mainly blogs per but Flickr source of same pixel size shows "all rights reserved" which could be copyfraud but User:Luckyaim's uploads are sourced to different source uploaders, clearly indicate his claim of being his own work and being PD are false. ww2censor (talk) 05:56, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Annvicsery.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:34, 2 April 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Annvicsery.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Promotional image of some sort. Likely copyrighted.  No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 08:07, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Hazara DP.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep, solution applied. After Midnight 0001 20:59, 3 April 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Hazara DP.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Logo of some sort. Likely copyrighted, if not, then no need for user created art.  No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 08:08, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Unable to be copyrighted. Tag with and .  — BQZip01 —  talk 07:38, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Verbslogo.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep, solution applied. After Midnight 0001 20:59, 3 April 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Verbslogo.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Logo of some sort - Likely copyrighted, if not, then no need for user created art. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 08:19, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Unable to be copyrighted. Tag with and .  — BQZip01 —  talk 07:38, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mjocreet.jpeg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:34, 2 April 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Mjocreet.jpeg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Studio style photo of a notable individual. Likely copyrighted.  No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 08:23, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Corazonaquinooath.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:34, 2 April 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Corazonaquinooath.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Historically significant photo. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 08:24, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Macapagaloath.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:34, 2 April 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Macapagaloath.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Historically significant photo. Likely copyrighted.  No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 08:26, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Magsaysayoath.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: delete; PD in Philippines does not extend to US post-1996. Kafziel Complaint Department 20:42, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * File:Magsaysayoath.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Historically significant photo. Likely copyrighted.  No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 08:26, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. This is in the public domain per PD-Philippines. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:09, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. This image became public domain under PD-Philippines in 2003 but not yet PD in the US per PD-US-1996 --Bluemask (talk) 06:10, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Sergio Osmena Inaugration.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:34, 2 April 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Sergio Osmena Inaugration.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Historically significant photo. Likely copyrighted, judging by logo in bottom right corner.  No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 08:26, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Marcos2nd termoath.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:34, 2 April 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Marcos2nd termoath.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Historically significant photo. Likely copyrighted.  No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 08:26, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Manuelroxasinaguration.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep. Kafziel Complaint Department 21:11, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * File:Manuelroxasinaguration.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Historically significant photo. Likely copyrighted.  No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 08:27, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. This is in the public domain per PD-Philippines. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:11, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Qurinoinugration1948.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:35, 25 February 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Qurinoinugration1948.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Historically significant photo. Likely copyrighted.  No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 08:27, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. This is in the public domain per PD-Philippines. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:11, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Qurinoinaguration1949.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:35, 25 February 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Qurinoinaguration1949.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Postage stamp of some sort. Likely copyrighted.  No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 08:27, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. This is in the public domain per PD-Philippines. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:13, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Carlosgarcia1957.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:35, 25 February 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Carlosgarcia1957.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Historically significant photo. Likely copyrighted.  No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 08:27, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. This is in the public domain per PD-Philippines. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:13, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Garciafullterm.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:35, 25 February 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Garciafullterm.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Historically significant photo. Likely copyrighted.  No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 08:27, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. This is in the public domain per PD-Philippines. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:13, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Planet Hollywood Towers.JPG
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep. FOP applies to buildings. Kafziel Complaint Department 21:07, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * File:Planet Hollywood Towers.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Architectural subject - FoP applies? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:40, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * It was taken by me, the angle isnt that great either but it helps complete the Las Vegas Tallest Buildings article. Neaco (talk) 00:11, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Taken in the U.S., freedom of panorama on architecture definitely applies per Commons. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:15, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hollywood Theaters, Laredo, TX IMG 2017.JPG
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep. FOP applies to buildings. Kafziel Complaint Department 21:04, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * File:Hollywood Theaters, Laredo, TX IMG 2017.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Architectural subject- Fop Apply ?(No date for building given) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:51, 11 March 2010 (UTC)


 * This theater opened about 2005. It is a picture of the theater by the user.Billy Hathorn (talk) 14:42, 11 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep. Taken in the U.S., freedom of panorama on architecture definitely applies regardless of building date per Commons. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:17, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Metalfrio-logo.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:34, 2 April 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Metalfrio-logo.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Another improbable claim of user creation by Edson Rosa. He says he created the image and releases it to public domain but probably took it from a Metalfrio company source such as this. Cnilep (talk) 17:37, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:PositivoInformaticaLogoBrand.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:34, 2 April 2010 (UTC)


 * File:PositivoInformaticaLogoBrand.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Another improbable claim of user creation by Edson Rosa. He says he created the image and releases it to public domain but probably took it from a Positivo company source such as this. Cnilep (talk) 17:47, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Sarkar Ra (627).jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:34, 2 April 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Sarkar Ra (627).jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * I asked the uploader where he got the file from and he replied..

''I met a follower of Shahi a couple of months who kindly lent me this picture, I've scanned it and thought it would be a good picture to go with the Wikipedia article. The follower took the picture personally and had allowed me to use it on my blog, so I suppose it wouldn't be much a problem on Wikipedia. I fixed it up on Photoshop as well, as it is around a decade old. What do you think?''

He is claiming here to be releasing the picture into the public domain and also claiming he is the copyright holder, both of which don't fit with his reply to my question. Off2riorob (talk) 20:48, 11 March 2010 (UTC) Off2riorob (talk) 20:48, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but what is your question? I've been given the image, hence own it, and want to put it out into the public. Maybe I don't understand Wikipedia rules regarding this, please advise me. -- Nasir | ناصر یونس  have a chat  22:03, 11 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Nasir, it is not a matter of Wikipedia rules but copyright law. Most often photographic copyright usually belongs to person who took the photo, or the person who paid to have the photo taken, and one of them owns the copyright. They are the only ones who can release the image into the public domain. You are simply in possession of a copy of a copyright photo but have no right to release it under any licence without specific permission. If we can prove that the person who gave you the photo also owns the copyright, which is not always the case fot the subject of a photo, and they are prepared to release it into the public domain, we would need to verify that by having their consent. ww2censor (talk) 23:18, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Ooooh right I understand. But I very much doubt that, because I'm not in contact with the person. But I've the original image that was printed after the picture being shot, including the small frames that come out from the old cameras. Suggestions? -- Nasir | ناصر یونس  have a chat  23:48, 11 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately that illustrates the point. You cannot verify the image is in the public domain and you can't get the copyright owner to give their consent, so I'm sorry you are caught between a rock and a hard place with nowhere to go. You just have to find a freely licenced image instead of this one though that may be difficult. ww2censor (talk) 23:56, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Rc johnson.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:11, 12 March 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Rc johnson.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * the source is - the The Commercial Appeal - the "the predominant daily newspaper of Memphis, Tennessee". maybe the picture really was taken by a United States Department of Education employee but the source implies no such thing. also, i have never seen portraits like that taken by United States Department of Education employees. take a look at  on ed.gov. click on a few of the pictures mentioned there. this R.C. Johnson picture looks nothing like those.  Misterdiscreet (talk) 23:50, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.