Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 13



File:Nancy Pearl.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:34, 25 March 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Nancy Pearl.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).

From the copyright page for the NEA:
 * Appears that copyright still resides with Marc Prozzo

'''Other articles and images on the Web site may be reproduced only with permission. Copyright is retained by the individual author or artist. Anyone seeking to use these materials should contact our Webmanager.'''

http://www.arts.gov/about/Copyright.html

The photographer's web site says his photos are copyright by him and the Nancy Pearl photos were done for Sasquatch Books. So either he own the copyright or Sasquatch does. I doubt it was a work for hire for the NEA. http://www.marcoprozzo.com/~jmarcopr/mpp/photography/portraits/index.shtml TheKingRat (talk) 07:02, 13 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete: clearly the image is attributed to the photographer and there is no evidence it has been released into the public domain either by the photographer, publisher, or that the NEA owns the copyright. We must err on the side a caution. ww2censor (talk) 16:48, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per ww2censor. — BQZip01 —  talk 18:09, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Gloucestercitybadge.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Kept, PD tag removed, renominated NRD. After Midnight 0001 21:38, 3 April 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Gloucestercitybadge.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Clearly logo Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:52, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep add FUR and fix image tag. — BQZip01 —  talk 07:15, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Madisonpettissmile.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:24, 16 March 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Madisonpettissmile.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * CSD:F7-F9 based on third lower photo on http://www.blackcelebkids.com/2009/03/12/the-bewitching-madison-pettis/ credited there as "Photo by Alberto E. Rodriguez/Getty Images" &mdash; JohnFromPinckney (talk) 13:34, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:DNA Tower South Side Taken from 2nd Floor with Atrium.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:34, 25 March 2010 (UTC)


 * File:DNA Tower South Side Taken from 2nd Floor with Atrium.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Delete: unused non-free derivative image of a modern US sculpture restricted by US freedom of panorama law. Another properly licenced image File:DNA Tower North Side Taken from Ground Level.jpg is being used in DNA Tower with a fair use rationale. ww2censor (talk) 16:42, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:MaRainey.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep, solution applied. After Midnight 0001 21:38, 3 April 2010 (UTC)


 * File:MaRainey.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Sourcing is inadiquate to determine copyright status, and current claim is dubious and contradictary. How can the author of a 20th century photo be known to have died more than 70 years ago when the author is listed as "unknown"? (And date given is absurdly same as upload date to Wikipedia, after subjects of photo's death but not more than 70 years ago.) Infrogmation (talk)
 * even given its age, its probably better to make a fair use claim for this image.--emerson7 03:36, 15 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep as Fair-use while this image seems to be attributed only to the "Frank Driggs Collection" at a number of places the Getty Images source indicates a circa 1923 date which looks about right as she would have been 37, the actual photographer is unknown. Add a fair-use rationale. ww2censor (talk) 10:02, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:24, 16 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep as a PD image retag with As the image does not have a copyright notice, it fails to comply with U.S. copyright law and lost its copyright years ago.  — BQZip01 —  talk 07:19, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:PollyMoran.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep, solution applied. After Midnight 0001 21:38, 3 April 2010 (UTC)


 * File:PollyMoran.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * As publishing date is unclear, no reason given that this would be PD-US. Kostelca (talk) 00:03, 14 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep as a PD image retag with as the image does not have a copyright notice, it fails to comply with U.S. copyright law and lost its copyright years ago. Furthermore, the actress in this photo died in 1952.  — BQZip01 —  talk 07:21, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.