Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 17



March 17


File:Washington's Crossing reenactment.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Deleted. No evidence that this particular image is public domain; would need confirmation from source. Also File:Washington crossing4.jpg listead as missing a fair use rationale. Shell  babelfish 09:10, 7 April 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Washington's Crossing reenactment.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Apparently taken from, which says at the bottom, "Copyright © State of New Jersey, 1996-2004". The site's legal statement says, "The State of New Jersey has made the content of these pages available to the public and anyone may view, copy or distribute State information found here without obligation to the State, unless otherwise stated on particular material or information to which a restriction on free use may apply. However, the State makes no warranty that materials contained herein are free of Copyright or Trademark claims or other restrictions or limitations on free use or display. Making a copy of such material may be subject to the copyright of trademark laws." It is not perfectly clear to me that this means the images are in the public domain, especially since the image gallery has a copyright notice at the bottom. Note that File:Washington crossing4.jpg, apparently taken from the same site, is tagged with , which says, "This work is copyrighted by the State of New Jersey. Materials may be used only for personal or non-commercial use providing all copyright and other proprietary notices are kept intact. Modification of the materials or use of the materials for any other purpose is a violation of the State of New Jersey's copyright and other proprietary rights." Whatever the situation is, it seems to me that the two images File:Washington's Crossing reenactment.jpg and File:Washington crossing4.jpg should be licensed identically. —Bkell (talk) 00:26, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Shouldn't they be tagged as Copyrighted free use? I don't see any reason to say that these images have copyright restrictions that make them nonfree.  Nyttend (talk) 17:08, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Clock-Icon.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  15:48, 30 March 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Clock-Icon.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * 2 tineye match - Maybe from theme/clipart set Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:14, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Drop.ioLogo.svg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Kept. Now tagged properly as text only logo. Shell  babelfish 09:11, 7 April 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Drop.ioLogo.svg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Logo - No indication uploader has rights to release as self Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:17, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep nothing but text= and  — BQZip01 —  talk 08:00, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Robby kriger solo.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  23:49, 3 April 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Robby kriger solo.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Eeekster (talk) 20:18, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete No one really knows what this is from.--Effingcrazy (talk) 06:32, 28 March 2010 (UTC)Effingcrazy
 * Appears to be cropped from the album cover (see Amazon.com). Cnilep (talk) 16:01, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Festival foods.svg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep. File licensed under fair use. — ξ xplicit  22:00, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * File:Festival foods.svg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Claimed as self but clearly logo Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:24, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Fair use on Festival Foods. Needs Trademark and FUR in place of the CC-A3. Cnilep (talk) 19:10, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Checks with cnilep. — BQZip01 —  talk 20:10, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The CC claim is obviously improper, but the PD-Textlogo is correct. It does need a trademark notice, though. ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe 02:38, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I think the 'flag' image above the words might make this this just creative enough to qualify for copyright, and therefore fair use rather than public domain. IANAL. Cnilep (talk) 16:31, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:UnderConstruction.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Deleted. Unlikely that uploader is original creator. Would need some kind of verification that they are the copyright holder. Shell  babelfish 09:14, 7 April 2010 (UTC)


 * File:UnderConstruction.gif ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Looks like clipart- Highly skeptical of self claim Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:26, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: In the spirit of WP:AGF, do you have more specifics which would lend themselves to support your claim? Your argument for deletion is very weak, bordering on insubstantial. ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe 02:35, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Tin Eye finds three similar images on the web, including one with the same dimensions and file size used on several sites, which it labels "same file". Cnilep (talk) 20:23, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:UnderConstruction2.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Deleted. After more investigation, uploader is claiming copyright to three different animated gifs which appear to originate from different places and are listed as being created by different people. It is increasingly unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder. Also, please see the variety of other image upload problems which seem to fit the pattern. Shell  babelfish 09:18, 7 April 2010 (UTC)


 * File:UnderConstruction2.gif ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Possibley from clipart- Skeptical of self claim Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:27, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: In the spirit of WP:AGF, do you have more specifics which would lend themselves to support your claim? Your argument for deletion is very weak, bordering on insubstantial. ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe 02:35, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:UnderConstruction3.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Deleted. See above. Shell  babelfish 09:18, 7 April 2010 (UTC)


 * File:UnderConstruction3.gif ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Clipart - Skeptical as to self claim Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:28, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: In the spirit of WP:AGF, do you have more specifics which would lend themselves to support your claim? Your argument for deletion is very weak, bordering on insubstantial. ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe 02:35, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.