Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 May 19



File:MBTA_Old_SystemMap.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep and tag with PD-Pre1978. — ξ xplicit  03:53, 2 June 2010 (UTC)


 * File:MBTA Old SystemMap.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Transit Map - Unlikley uploder is copyright holder of map ? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:16, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. This was publicly displayed in the U.S. prior to 1978—and without a copyright notice. Thus, is in the public domain per PD-Pre1978. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:09, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Spotted leopard.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep under good faith. — ξ xplicit  03:53, 2 June 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Spotted leopard.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Pic looked too professional to have been taken by an average layperson. Uploader needs to prove that he took these pictures, beyond just standard template proofs. Kiteinthewind  Leave a message! 19:32, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. I think good faith should be assumed here. Metadata is present, and user does not have a history of suspicious uploads. I disagree that the picture looks "too professional". IronGargoyle (talk) 20:14, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:O2 wireless box II.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: procedural keep. As the file is tagged as non-free, this isn't the venue to discuss this matter. Tagged as di-replaceable fair use instead. — ξ xplicit  03:53, 2 June 2010 (UTC)


 * File:O2 wireless box II.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * There's no earthly way I can see that this is a legitimate fair-use image. It's a relatively common product and still in production—there must be thousands of the things about which someone could take a photo of. –  iride  scent  20:08, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Tea Party Protestors.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:59, 2 June 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Tea Party Protestors.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This image returns three TinEye search results. Most notably, this website has the exact same image, but at a much higher resolution. Doubtful that the uploader owns the copyright. — ξ xplicit  22:12, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.