Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 May 26



File:Neelambari malayalam movie.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:41, 9 June 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Neelambari malayalam movie.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * M aen K. A. Talk  17:49, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:File-Dominew.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:41, 9 June 2010 (UTC)


 * File:File-Dominew.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * False licence PD-old. Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 08:57, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Dominika.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:41, 9 June 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Dominika.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * False license PD-old Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 09:08, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mark Bywater receiving Master Plumber's Certificate.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:41, 9 June 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Mark Bywater receiving Master Plumber's Certificate.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * I see no permission from the college that this picture from its website can be used. It says the author is Mark Bywater (the subject of the picture) but the picture has been uploaded by a user with a different name. Without clear permission (OTRS perhaps) this picture should be deleted as an unfree file. Simple Bob (talk) 18:03, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The image was taken by the institute and was given to the subject, who in turn provided the photo for use on the colleges website. That is why the author is specified as Mark Bywater, as the image is his, and the source is stated as the College of West Anglia. KingOfTheLynn (talk) 15:09, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * So where is the permission to use it? That's my point. You uploaded it, yet you are not the copyright owner, Mark Bywater is. To be permitted on Wikipedia or Wikimedia Commons there must be an irrevocable and compatible licence clearly on the source media - which there is not in this case - or there must be permission filed through OTRS. --Simple Bob (talk) 18:45, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually it sounds like the copyright belongs to whoever took the picture, since Mark Bywater is probably not the photographer and the subject, but it's still a permission problem. VernoWhitney (talk) 02:13, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The article that this image was used in has since been deleted. The image uploader has since been banned for sockpuppetry and the sockmaster account  was banned yesterday for a number of problems, not least of which was multiple image copyright violations. This is just another problem caused by this disruptive editor. This image should just be deleted now. --Simple Bob (talk) 06:19, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.