Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 November 13



File:AasthaChaudhary.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:25, 20 November 2010 (UTC)


 * File:AasthaChaudhary.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Copyrighted image from  Redtigerxyz  Talk 12:58, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Blatant copy and paste by a WP:SPA. &mdash; 70.21.16.94 (talk) 15:57, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - You can delete it. It has been replaced by a TV Screenshot. The fair use details have also been provided for that Screenshot. You can see it at - Aastha Chaudhary. Thanks for deletion, really it may not be a free picture. UnbeatableIndia2020 (talk) 07:12, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Eric Ravilious woodcut - copyright has not, as stated, expired

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ravilious1925.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:44, 13 November 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Ravilious1925.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Weelie (talk) 14:39, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Pattaya city thailand.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  19:48, 13 November 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Pattaya city thailand.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * at least 2 of the images used in this photo compilation are possibly unfree images: 1 image belongs to http://www.novabizz.com according to http://pattaya-thailand-hotelandtravel.blogspot.com/2009/11/pattaya-thailand-introduction.html, the other of the possibly unfree images also appears here ->http://www.lets-tour-bangkok.com/pattaya-attractions.html. It is highly probable that the upoader (who has a history of uploading unfree images) has downloaded other people's images for the compilation. Takeaway (talk) 16:53, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:James iredell ss.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:13, 27 November 2010 (UTC)


 * File:James iredell ss.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Can find nothing to support contention that this is PD- united states government. Uploader's source http://www.wrecksite.eu/imgBrowser.aspx?12999 got it from http://www.archeosousmarine.net/, and neither give any info on where the image comes from.  No US National archive marks, not in online catalogue (although this of itself is not a guarantee it wasn't taken by the us government).  Liberty ships are merchantmen - crewed by civilians and travelling in convoys, so at least as likely that photo was taken by a civilian. Elen of the Roads (talk) 23:45, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.