Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 November 28



File:Cochin.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:44, 12 December 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Cochin.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Collage of several images, no source for any image. — ξ xplicit  01:08, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Cochinport.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:44, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Deleted all but File:Chera Emblem.jpg which is does not claim copyright. --After Midnight 0001 13:30, 12 December 2010 (UTC)


 * This is probably original work, since it has metadata --JovianEye (talk) 13:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * This is probably original work, since it has cellphone metadata --JovianEye (talk) 13:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * – Also on Commons.
 * – Also on Commons.
 * This is probably original work, since it has cellphone metadata --JovianEye (talk) 13:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * This is probably original work, since it has cellphone metadata --JovianEye (talk) 13:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * This is probably original work, since it has cellphone metadata --JovianEye (talk) 13:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * This is probably original work, since it has cellphone metadata --JovianEye (talk) 13:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * This is probably original work, since it has cellphone metadata --JovianEye (talk) 13:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * This is probably original work, since it has cellphone metadata --JovianEye (talk) 13:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * This is probably original work, since it has cellphone metadata --JovianEye (talk) 13:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * – Also on Commons.
 * – Also on Commons.
 * This is probably original work, since it has cellphone metadata --JovianEye (talk) 13:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * This is probably original work, since it has cellphone metadata --JovianEye (talk) 13:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * This is probably original work, since it has cellphone metadata --JovianEye (talk) 13:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * This is probably original work, since it has cellphone metadata --JovianEye (talk) 13:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * This is probably original work, since it has cellphone metadata --JovianEye (talk) 13:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * This is probably original work, since it has cellphone metadata --JovianEye (talk) 13:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * This is probably original work, since it has cellphone metadata --JovianEye (talk) 13:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * This is probably original work, since it has cellphone metadata --JovianEye (talk) 13:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * This is probably original work, since it has cellphone metadata --JovianEye (talk) 13:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * This is probably original work, since it has cellphone metadata --JovianEye (talk) 13:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * This is probably original work, since it has cellphone metadata --JovianEye (talk) 13:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * This is probably original work, since it has cellphone metadata --JovianEye (talk) 13:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * This is probably original work, since it has cellphone metadata --JovianEye (talk) 13:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * This is probably original work, since it has cellphone metadata --JovianEye (talk) 13:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * This is probably original work, since it has cellphone metadata --JovianEye (talk) 13:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * This is probably original work, since it has cellphone metadata --JovianEye (talk) 13:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * This is probably original work, since it has cellphone metadata --JovianEye (talk) 13:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * This is probably original work, since it has cellphone metadata --JovianEye (talk) 13:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * This is probably original work, since it has cellphone metadata --JovianEye (talk) 13:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * This is probably original work, since it has cellphone metadata --JovianEye (talk) 13:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * This is probably original work, since it has cellphone metadata --JovianEye (talk) 13:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * This is probably original work, since it has cellphone metadata --JovianEye (talk) 13:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * This is probably original work, since it has cellphone metadata --JovianEye (talk) 13:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * This is probably original work, since it has cellphone metadata --JovianEye (talk) 13:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * This is probably original work, since it has cellphone metadata --JovianEye (talk) 13:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)


 * All files were uploaded by, who seems to either not know about much of legal copyright, or ignores it. This user's earlier uploads—which I tagged with di-no permission—point to authors who aren't the uploader, some which were linked to the skyscraperscity forums. After a while, Arunvarmaother stopped attributing other people claimed to hold the copyright to all the subsequent image they uploaded. However, I reviewed the user's deleted contributions and found that several of these self-claimed images were deleted a copyright violations, with the source being none other than the skyscraperscity forums. As such, I doubt any of these images were actually taken by the uploader and they should be deleted per WP:COPYVIO: "If contributors have been shown to have a history of extensive copyright violation, it may be assumed without further evidence that all of their major contributions are copyright violations, and they may be removed indiscriminately." — ξ xplicit  01:32, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:TonyDiSanto.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:42, 29 November 2010 (UTC)


 * File:TonyDiSanto.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Originally from Getty Images and uploader claims, "Permission given by purchaser of image to Berliet to distribute it freely", but there's no indication on the Getty Images site that the image that the rights to the image was sold to anyone. Mosmof (talk) 04:47, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:UVic Lipdub Trumpet.GIF

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:44, 12 December 2010 (UTC)


 * File:UVic Lipdub Trumpet.GIF ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Delete: source provided indicates "all rights reserved", so licence is false unless permission is provided. ww2censor (talk) 07:21, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Fairey Barracuda.1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:44, 12 December 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Fairey Barracuda.1.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Why are we assuming this is made by the British government? Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:48, 28 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete: there is no evidence on the source website to support the licence or other information claimed. ww2censor (talk) 23:27, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:St. Queen Ketevan.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:45, 12 December 2010 (UTC)


 * File:St. Queen Ketevan.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:St Queen Ketevan.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:01, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:909.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:45, 12 December 2010 (UTC)


 * File:909.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Uploaded with edit summary: "fair use", while linking to external website which (while not up now) was up then: http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.tr909.org/. Status is thus unclear. Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:37, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.