Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 October 18



File:Apmciblaetc123321gdghdurufhfju.jpeg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:55, 1 November 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Apmciblaetc123321gdghdurufhfju.jpeg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * if this is the legit intertitle from the show, the uploader would not be (c) holder; if not, no need to keep non-official user-created art: no source Skier Dude  ( talk  04:05, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:HMCSHalifax3.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  21:02, 1 November 2010 (UTC)


 * File:HMCSHalifax3.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * As of now, http://www.flickr.com/photos/ronancantwell/4164809946/ shows the license for this picture to be CC-BY-NC-ND. Since it was never reviewed, there is no way to know if the license was ever the CC-BY-SA claimed here. Not free enough. Angus McLellan (Talk) 11:30, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Black DS 1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  21:02, 1 November 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Black DS 1.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Possibly unfree, with no encyclopedic usage. See File:Black DS.jpg and File:Black DS Lite 1.jpg. :| TelCo  NaSp  Ve :|  11:30, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Probably unfree and orphaned.--ARTEST4ECHO (talk 15:14, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:HMS Brazen monument.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  21:02, 1 November 2010 (UTC)


 * File:HMS Brazen monument.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Source page http://www.publicsculpturesofsussex.co.uk/object?id=248#photographs shows the license for this image as CC-BY-NC-SA rather than CC-BY-SA. Not free enough and replaceable. Angus McLellan (Talk) 11:32, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I have no idea of the difference between the two licenses. If you have access to a freer replacement feel free to make the replacement. I have no particular commitment to the image in question. Regards, Acad Ronin (talk) 13:55, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Fred Salvador Athletic Field.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep - de minimis. Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:54, 1 November 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Fred Salvador Athletic Field.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Not enough information to verify the copyright status of that logo. :| TelCo  NaSp  Ve :|  12:39, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Wrist piercings.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  21:02, 1 November 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Wrist piercings.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Source Flickr page - http://www.flickr.com/photos/graphicward/2492612811/ - currently shows the license as CC-BY-NC-ND. While it is possible that the uploader on Flickr changed the license from CC-BY, we can be sure that it was never licensed under a CC-BY-3.0 license as shown here. Angus McLellan (Talk) 12:51, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Piece of Me Circus Tour.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  21:02, 1 November 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Piece of Me Circus Tour.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Source Flickr page - http://www.flickr.com/photos/jamiesworld/3358185003/ - currently shows license as CC-BY-NC-SA. While it is at least possible that it was once licensed CC-BY-2.0, we can be sure that it was never licensed CC-BY-3.0 as claimed here. Error raises doubts as to whether this image was ever free enough. Angus McLellan (Talk) 12:57, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Matthew Mcconaughey(Marshall football).jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  21:02, 1 November 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Matthew Mcconaughey(Marshall football).jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Source Flickr page - http://www.flickr.com/photos/40770629@N04/3752328939/ - shows license as all rights reserved. While this could always have been something different at the time that it was uploaded, it certainly wasn't CC-BY-3.0 as claimed here. It can be doubted whether this image was ever free. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:00, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Antanom.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  21:02, 1 November 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Antanom.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Source Flickr page - http://www.flickr.com/photos/12210885@N07/4053207480/ - shows all rights reserved. Uploader's rationale for PD licensing not clear. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:04, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Clearly "all rights reserved" thus not allowed on Wikipedia.--ARTEST4ECHO (talk 15:17, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Puneet vashist1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:17, 20 October 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Puneet vashist1.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Image not found on Flickr (after cursory search), but since Flickr images are all rights reserved or some variant on CC-2.0, the claimed GFDL, CC-1.0, CC-2.5 and CC-3.0 cannot ever have been correct. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:09, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Whitebelliedseaeagle.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  21:02, 1 November 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Whitebelliedseaeagle.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Flickr source page - http://www.flickr.com/photos/hellon_earth/173128161/ - shows license as all rights reserve and redirects licensing enquiries to Getty Images. In addition, Flickr images are never licensed CC-BY-SA-2.5 (rather CC-BY-SA-2.0). Reason to doubt whether this image was ever free, most unlikely to have ever been licensed as claimed here. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:19, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Clearly "all rights reserved" thus not allowed on Wikipedia.--ARTEST4ECHO (talk 15:18, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Egginthewaffle.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  23:03, 1 November 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Egginthewaffle.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Cursory search did not find this exact image on Flickr, but other related images are all licensed all rights reserved. In addition, we can be sure that the Flickr image page this came from never showed as CC-BY-SA-3.0 license. This raises some serious doubts as to whether this image was ever free. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:23, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * My friend (Flickr user name jenniferhelen) shot this photo specifically to add to the Wikipedia entry for egg in the basket. She released all rights to the picture. What else is needed from her? Shamrox (talk) 08:38, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - I have given Shamrox detailed instructions on how to sent this threw the OTRS system on his Talk page.--ARTEST4ECHO (talk 14:33, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Additional comment It's now been a week with no fix by Shamrox.  Unless Shamrox fixes this image before the end of the 14-day period, this image should be deleted.--ARTEST4ECHO (talk 12:58, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Taro1.PNG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:55, 1 November 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Taro1.PNG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Tagged as user-created, but almost certainly a screenshot of a copyrighted TV program. (ESkog)(Talk) 14:30, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:U1@Filmfare 2.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  21:02, 1 November 2010 (UTC)


 * File:U1@Filmfare 2.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).
 * File:Yuvan@filmfare02.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).
 * File:U1@Filmfare-001.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Image from a user with a long history of copyright misunderstanding; pixellated low-quality image suggests a scan from another source. No camera metadata or anything that would corroborate the claim this is user-created. (ESkog)(Talk) 14:33, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * NOTE: I've added two more images to this listing, as they are effectively the same. The presence of the same pose in an image here and the users insistence on providing an image for Yuvan Shankar Raja (e.g. the now deleted File:Yuvan@fitnessone.jpg, File:Yuvan@fitness1.jpg and commons:File:Yuvan@fitnessone.jpg) strongly indicates that these are non-free and unusable images. VernoWhitney (talk) 15:33, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Clearly these are all photoshoped from the same image. I would suspect File:Yuvan@filmfare02.jpg is the original image.  Additionally that image is "all rights reserved" per the (R) on the photo and therefore is not allowed on Wikipedia.--ARTEST4ECHO (talk 15:21, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Christian in Pilgrim's Progress.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn.--ARTEST4ECHO (talk 13:51, 19 October 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Christian in Pilgrim's Progress.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Says "Scanned from public domain material", so this image isn't PD-self. Therefore source needs to be supplied.  Until that time how do we know this is "Public Domain".--ARTEST4ECHO (talk 15:31, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Please see page 18 of this pdf link from Internet Archive: . It is the same image that I scanned from a hard copy of the 1913 COPYRIGHT book. This is ten years before the cut off year of 1923! This book is public domain, and a scanned page is also public domain. If it needs changes in licensing, then specify the changes needed.--Drboisclair (talk) 04:58, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Rachael Robinson Elmer, the creator of this illustration, died in 1919 - see here - so that PD-art-life-70 is most appropriate here. Angus McLellan (Talk) 12:20, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Just to make it clear, when I tagged this image the entire image summary was "Scanned from public domain material drboisclair 23:36, 11 October 2005 (UTC)" and then claimed a pd-self claim. see None of the information above was available. However, now that a PD source and a correct tag has been supplied by  Angusmclellan and Drboisclair, I see no reason not to withdraw the "Possibly unfree files" discussion.--ARTEST4ECHO (talk 13:51, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Canopy of Honour.JPG
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  21:02, 1 November 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Canopy of Honour.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * I see no evidence that this images copyright is held by user:ProCivitate and not by The Birmingham Civic Society or the firm who designed or is designing this monument. --ARTEST4ECHO (talk 16:02, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Caratula Anoche.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:55, 1 November 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Caratula Anoche.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).
 * File:Caratula Las Mantenidas.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).
 * File:Caratula Infame.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Album cover copyrights are usually held by music company. --ARTEST4ECHO (talk 18:20, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Audrey Hepburn Breakfast Tiffanys.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:55, 1 November 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Audrey Hepburn Breakfast Tiffanys.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This appears to be a publicity shot or a film scene from Breakfast at Tiffanys. I doubt uploader hold copyright. --ARTEST4ECHO (talk 18:26, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ericofon ad.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:55, 1 November 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Ericofon ad.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This is a coprighted at by the "Ericofon" company --ARTEST4ECHO (talk 18:27, 18 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. Given the history of this phone, we should assume that the advertising material wasn't first published in the USA. Doesn't seem to be any way that this could be in the public domain in Sweden as of now, so not PD in the US either. Angus McLellan (Talk) 16:28, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Tjf-inverted blue.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:55, 1 November 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Tjf-inverted blue.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * corporate logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude  ( talk  19:29, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Edelmanninstudio.png
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  21:02, 1 November 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Edelmanninstudio.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * seems to be wrongly licensed, cf. http://www.21stcenturyradio.com/yellowsub/ Eva K. is evil 20:16, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.