Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 September 10



File:Norb08.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:55, 24 September 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Norb08.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Uploader stated "Picture of Norbert MacLean III located in a law publication in Sydney, New South Wales, Australia ", going by that it is highly likely to be copyrighted to the law publication and not the uploader which makes it a copy violation and license on Wikipedia invalid. Bidgee (talk) 12:23, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - uploader gave the game away, picture is scanned from a magazine. Off2riorob (talk) 17:38, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image uploads by User:Greco22

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep all and restore their fair use rationales. — ξ xplicit  08:13, 24 September 2010 (UTC)




 * Note: I am boldly combining the submissions by of this user into one listing, as they all have the same issue: claims that the photographs are PD-old for subjects who passed away much more recently than 100 years. Magog the Ogre (talk) 15:47, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per ESkog. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:25, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Do not delete, restore non-free tag, add rationale if you feel like it or nrd. Magog the Ogre (talk) 15:42, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Agree with Magog the Ogre. Restore non-free tag, add fair use rationale where applicable. Constantine  ✍  14:54, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:388px-NewMorning.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:55, 24 September 2010 (UTC)


 * File:388px-NewMorning.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Scanning a copyrighed item dose not create a copyright or license. This is a Score Cover meaning it is an unfree file. --ARTEST4ECHO talk 18:46, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:5pm screenshot.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: withdrawn, image tag changed to Non-free software screenshot.--ARTEST4ECHO talk 16:40, 16 September 2010 (UTC)


 * File:5pm screenshot.gif ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Screen shots of copyrighted sofwhere dose not create a copyright or license. pd-self is the wrong tag --ARTEST4ECHO talk 19:12, 10 September 2010 (UTC)


 * updated the tag and other info Disarea (talk) 15:51, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Look good now. I'm closing this discussion.--ARTEST4ECHO talk 16:40, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Mybestheadshotformyuserpage.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξ xplicit  08:13, 24 September 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Mybestheadshotformyuserpage.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * "usable only on Wikipedia" does not appear to meet Wikipedia licencing standards. And the uploader had been made aware of concerns back in 2009. Active Banana   ( bananaphone  20:05, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Then I shall change the permission on the picture. I took the picture. It is a picture of me. I have licensed my image under CC Attribution. Though I do have a question, is a picture for someone's user page technically part of the encyclopedia?  Unless there exist an article about me in which it was used how does it matter if some other website can use my image?
 * If I need to change those permissions to keep it fine. Consider that done.  I still would like to know how a picture for my userpage needs to be a free image at all?--Hfarmer (talk) 20:42, 10 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep. We always permit nonfree licensing statements if free ones are also given — for example, cc-by-nc is permitted if cc-by-sa is also applied.  Therefore, a simple only-on-Wikipedia permission is fine if a cc-by is also applied, as it has been here.  Nyttend (talk) 03:29, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Alexandraburkebadboysxfactor.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:55, 24 September 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Alexandraburkebadboysxfactor.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Appears to be an X-Factor screenshot. J Milburn (talk) 23:31, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, clearly is marked as copyrighted here. Off2riorob (talk) 14:37, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Alexandraburkexfactor.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:55, 24 September 2010 (UTC)


 * File:Alexandraburkexfactor.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Uploader has a history of uploading questionable images of Burke. Generally suspicious image- web resolution, low quality. Looks like it's been copied all over the place. J Milburn (talk) 23:33, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, this whole area is riddled with copyright violations. Off2riorob (talk) 14:36, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.