Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 April 12



File:Houston Light Rail Expansion.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:12, 7 May 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Houston Light Rail Expansion.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Not a work of the US Government. (It's a local agency work.) Eeekster (talk) 00:34, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - most of the other Light Rail articles in the US have maps/system maps which are created by the author. Some are based on agency maps, but are not the agency map per se.--Whiteguru (talk) 08:33, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:CollagePrishtina.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:04, 27 April 2011 (UTC)


 * File:CollagePrishtina.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Looks like a set of commercial images Eeekster (talk) 00:36, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Fazil Say.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:04, 27 April 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Fazil Say.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Small web-resolution photograph. Same format and obviously taken on the same occasion and from the same camera spot as this commercial news photo Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:57, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:WSHammond-official.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn I've elsewhere been pointed to a footnote for commons:COM:FOP which establishes that public display pre-1978 is the same as publication. VernoWhitney (talk) 22:42, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * File:WSHammond-official.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Image painted 1915, but there's no apparent evidence of publication. VernoWhitney (talk) 14:17, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * No evidence that an official painting was published ? Surely in the context of this image, before the advent of mass copying, the publication date is at worst the date it was hung on a wall for display somewhere. It seems vastly most likely that this date is near the creation date. 21:15, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Gombitovacollage.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  11:10, 13 April 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Gombitovacollage.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * derivative works of non-free covers. Is clearly not in the public domain. Peripitus (Talk) 21:11, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi, this is just a collage of several promo posters. Actually I didn't use the file as it looks too colorish in the infobox, so I don't mind deleting it. Don't understand though, what you mean by 'clearly not in the public domain'. Uzerakount (talk) 21:16, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Hemingway Paris apartment 1924.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep, replaced license tag with more generic PD tag since the source does explicitly indicate that it's PD, just not why. VernoWhitney (talk) 20:48, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Hemingway Paris apartment 1924.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * License tag is invalid because description claims 1924. Eeekster (talk) 22:16, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Link to JFK Library clearly states Public Domain. Thanks. Truthkeeper88 (talk) 23:08, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.