Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 April 15



File:Alligatorfarm.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:24, 30 April 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Alligatorfarm.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * No information on original publication, including no date, so copyright status cannot be determined &mdash;innotata 00:01, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Image002 4.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:14, 13 May 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Image002 4.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Book cover unlikely to be CC licensed. Eeekster (talk) 02:25, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Yup. Probably eligible for fair use, but certainly not free. Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 03:01, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:11 UDR Inspection.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:24, 30 April 2011 (UTC)


 * File:11 UDR Inspection.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Appears to have been scanned, but the image predates 1992 when the regiment was amalagamented into the Royal Irish regiment. I suspect strongly that the uploader is not the rights holder Jezhotwells (talk) 07:41, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Newtownhamilton PVCP -2.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:24, 30 April 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Newtownhamilton PVCP -2.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This is a scan but the source of the scan is not given, likely from the 1980s. The reginmemnt was amalgamented into the RIR in 1992. I suspect that the uploader is not the copyright holder. Jezhotwells (talk) 07:50, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Juano Hernandez.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:24, 30 April 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Juano Hernandez.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Per recent attorney advice, we cannot accept the OTRS release at 2010021610034321, but instead must determine the copyright status of each image tagged with it. There is insufficient information on the origin of this photograph to determine when it was created and by whom or when it was first published. We would need to verify that this is free to retain it or to assert a valid fair use rationale. Fair use rationale is no longer necessary as a free image of the gentleman has been located and uploaded at File:Juano hernandez in intruder in the dust.jpg by User:ScottyBerg. It goes without saying, I trust, that this is not meant to imply wrongdoing on the part of the uploader, who certainly went above and beyond in attempting to obtain clearance. Unfortunately, it simply isn't a usable release as is, and as OTRS was not supplied the e-mail address of the ICP spokesman it is not a simple matter of writing the gentleman directly to clarify, as we will sometimes attempt. Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:47, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid that, in light of the legal opinion, we really have no choice but to delete this file. This is obviously a professional studio photograph, for which rights would reside with either the photographer or his/her employer. However, the free image I found is pretty darn good, if I say so myself, and has already replaced this photo at every one of its former locations. Also I've discovered that one of his early films is PD. So we seem to have an abundance of riches on this person and no need for an unfree image. ScottyBerg (talk) 21:26, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Amor a la española.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:24, 30 April 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Amor a la española.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This is a Spanish movie, not an Argentine one, so Argentine copyright law does not apply here Cambalachero (talk) 14:10, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Jonaglobalpinoy2.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:24, 30 April 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Jonaglobalpinoy2.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Derivative work of a probably non-free poster. January ( talk ) 18:30, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Jonauncoveredtick.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:24, 30 April 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Jonauncoveredtick.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Derivative work of a clearly copyrightable ticket. Original uploader claimed it was free, although it was conflictingly tagged with non-free licensing by another user. Wouldn't qualify for fair use in any article. January ( talk ) 18:45, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Piantadino.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  17:14, 13 May 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Piantadino.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * PD-AR-Photo is only for photos, not for comic books. Comic books have the regular protection of 70 years after author's death Cambalachero (talk) 21:08, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Can somebody add a fair use rationale then? It should be within guidelines to illustrate the comic as part of the article.♦ Dr. Blofeld  21:17, 15 April 2011 (UTC)


 * None of the articles discuss the content itself of the image, and the purpose of visual identification would only apply to the article of the comic book itself, which those articles are not Cambalachero (talk) 22:12, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Chriscoxkk025.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:24, 30 April 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Chriscoxkk025.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Clear press photo. The "information" template is completely empty. Cambalachero (talk) 21:18, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Wasedalib1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:24, 30 April 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Wasedalib1.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * No evidence of CC-BY license. The source website states "all rights reserved". current link is: http://www.waseda.jp/eng/about/episode/05.html Elekhh (talk) 22:32, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Wasedalib2.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:24, 30 April 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Wasedalib2.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * No evidence of CC-BY license. The source website states "all rights reserved". current link is: http://www.waseda.jp/eng/about/episode/05.html Elekhh (talk) 22:35, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ambrose Fernando2.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:24, 30 April 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Ambrose Fernando2.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * seems like a scanned press photo Cambalachero (talk) 23:44, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ambrose Fernando3.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:24, 30 April 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Ambrose Fernando3.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * seems like a scanned press photo Cambalachero (talk) 23:45, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.