Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 April 16



File:Lippman.magnetar.email.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: non-free - changed to fair use by uploader Magog the Ogre (talk) 01:36, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Lippman.magnetar.email.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * It appears this email was created by a private entity, of Deutsch Bank, and exists only on the senate.gov site as fair use as part of a trial. This image would likely qualify as fair use under some form. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:58, 16 April 2011 (UTC)


 * they are not part of a trial. they are part of a government report and as such should be considered PD Gov Decora (talk) 03:50, 16 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Are you sure? Not part of a trial, no, but part of hearings, and originally written by a private entity. Magog the Ogre (talk) 04:03, 16 April 2011 (UTC)


 * no i am not sure, i had never thought of it before. what are the regulations? how do i mark it for fair use? Decora (talk) 04:15, 16 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Lippman.magnetar.email2.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: non-free - changed to fair use by uploader Magog the Ogre (talk) 01:36, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Lippman.magnetar.email2.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * see my nomination immediately above. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:58, 16 April 2011 (UTC)


 * they are not part of a trial. they are part of a government report and as such should be considered PD Gov Decora (talk) 03:50, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
 * replied above Decora (talk) 04:15, 16 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:William A. Bootle.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  17:14, 13 May 2011 (UTC)


 * File:William A. Bootle.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * No evidence that pictures credited to a district court in Georgia are under PD-USGov Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:14, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Jesse Mercer Plaza (Mercer University).jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:24, 30 April 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Jesse Mercer Plaza (Mercer University).jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Photograph of a presumably copyrighted statue in the US, derivative work, not covered by F.o.P. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:20, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:TiffanyGiardinaNoAverageAngel.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep, file is tagged as non-free. After Midnight 0001 14:16, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * File:TiffanyGiardinaNoAverageAngel.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Not likely to be a government work. Eeekster (talk) 19:02, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:2D1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:24, 30 April 2011 (UTC)


 * File:2D1.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This is a character from the "Clint Eastwood" videoclip by Gorrilaz Cambalachero (talk) 19:36, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Logo emt.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  21:12, 14 May 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Logo emt.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Arrangement of geometric shapes possibly more complicated than PD-textlogo. VernoWhitney (talk) 19:37, 16 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment This was listed again at Possibly unfree files/2011 April 26, so those comments should also be taken into consideration. VernoWhitney (talk) 13:39, 10 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete: the sailing boat image in this logo is not just simple shapes and shows original creativity, so the current PD licence is unacceptable. ww2censor (talk) 16:02, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Tiger.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 17 April 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Tiger.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Chaotic upload history, multiple different images uploaded on top of each other, usually without any change to the image description page; none of the many versions has a plausible source declaration; none or few have credible claims of "own work". The version that has been recently in use on some user pages was uploaded by a short-lived account without any explanation and seems unlikely to be genuine own work. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:20, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Repholsman.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:24, 30 April 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Repholsman.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The tag on this image is incorrect. It is not the work of the United States Congress or the federal government. Holsman is a state representative, not a U.S. representative, and the copyright on the image is owned by the State of Missouri, not the government of the United States.

Source appears to be: http://www.house.mo.gov/billtracking/bills081/member/mem045.htm Lincolnite (talk) 23:25, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.