Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 April 4



File:Fluff-Brown-1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:03, 18 April 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Fluff-Brown-1.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This is a book/photo scan. As such I very much doubt the uploader's claim to be the image creator. If the uploader can't supply proof of ownership and permission via OTRS then I would suggest it is deleted. Biker Biker (talk) 09:24, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Stormer 250-1970.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:03, 18 April 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Stormer 250-1970.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The image's description is "AJS publicity shot" implying that it was created by the company and that this is a scan of that image. If the uploader can't provide proof of permission to use (perhaps via OTRS) then it should be deleted Biker Biker (talk) 09:26, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Siegle's steam spray inhaler (1864).jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Moved to  2011040410017974. OTRS ticket was received issue. Admin VernoWhitney has tagged image as OTRS incomplete. No longer a PUF issue.--ARTEST4ECHO (talk/contribs) 14:08, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Siegle's steam spray inhaler (1864).jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The file page claims that the file is "faithful digitisation of a unique historic image", but the file appears to be a modern photograph of an object, and so could be replaced by someone else taking a picture of the same object. —Mark Dominus (talk) 16:29, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The web page from which it was taken suggests contacting the web site owner for a higher-quality version. I have written to that address to request that the owner license the high-quality version under the GFDL.  —Mark Dominus (talk) 16:33, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The owner indicates that he will license it to us. —Mark Dominus (talk) 15:37, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

The PUF is the incorrect tag for this issue, since it is not tagged with a "Free" tag. It should be tagged with Di-disputed fair use rationale, which I have done.--ARTEST4ECHO (talk/contribs) 18:59, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Pleasedonotcontributesign.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Changed to Fair-use. As RJaguar3 points out image is tagged as free, but should be fair use. --ARTEST4ECHO (talk/contribs) 16:33, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Pleasedonotcontributesign.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * No indication that the creative text central to the image is free. (Although it is publicly displayed without a copyright notice, there is no indication that the sign was publicly displayed before 1989, when a lack of notice and subsequent failure to register would cause a loss of copyright.) RJaguar3 &#124;  u  &#124;  t  17:39, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Are you out of your mind? Two words: Fair use. --Coolcaesar (talk) 05:07, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Currently, the image is tagged as free. If the image is not free, then it must either be used under WP:NFCC (which requires a nonfree use rationale for each instance of the image's use) or be deleted.  If you want to re-tag the text to indicate that it is non-free and then provide a nonfree use rationale for the image's use in the two articles in which it appears, I'll close this.  RJaguar3 &#124;  u  &#124;  t  05:10, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Personal progres with necklace.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn (changed to Fair-use). --ARTEST4ECHO (talk/contribs) 16:56, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Personal progres with necklace.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The "Personal Progress" program and "Young Womanhood Recognition Award" (which this is an image of) is constantly being updated. Therefore the copyright for this particular medallion (as a 3d work of art) is would be held by the artist/creator or by the LDS church, so the laws for art apply here, the PD-art-70-3d tag would be needed along with the PD-self tag for use of the photograph.  Since the uploader has failed to show that the particular medallion is Public domain (older then 70 yeas from the death date of the creator) the medallion is copyrighted. --ARTEST4ECHO (talk/contribs) 19:07, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:RoK MND logo.svg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: deleted as G7. The other discussions remain open. Magog the Ogre (talk) 15:54, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
 * File:RoK MND logo.svg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Uploader placed this cryptic note on the page (see its source code):  This flag is of a national government institution of South Korea, and is not copyrighted. Since I made this file, I release this file into GDFL. (Note that the insignia and flag itself is NOT in public domain). First off, government works in South Korea are not automatically public domain, AFAIK. Second, if there is a non-PD part of this flag, then it is a derivative work. Well which is it? The uploader's explanation doesn't suffice at this point to prove the free status of this flag. Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:20, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. per nom.--ARTEST4ECHO (talk/contribs) 12:04, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:3waterjing'anshi.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:03, 18 April 2011 (UTC)


 * File:3waterjing'anshi.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:3waterjing'anshi.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:02, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.