Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 December 7



File:BrianJFox.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:03, 21 December 2011 (UTC)


 * File:BrianJFox.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * "Photographed by Lissa Liggett, 2001" but uploader is User:Brianjfox. Wouldn't we need some kind of proof of Brian's permission to use Lissa's photo? Stefan2 (talk) 00:01, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Boojum tree ucr botanical garden.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 21 December 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Boojum tree ucr botanical garden.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Source says "Apache::Gallery © 2001-2005 Michael Legart, Hest Design". Stefan2 (talk) 00:08, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:HorrorNews.net Company Logo.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:03, 21 December 2011 (UTC)


 * File:HorrorNews.net Company Logo.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Invalid license, no evidence of permission. Eeekster (talk) 00:09, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Logo description updated with link to permission page source, source page details usuage allowance AdrianMKane (talk) 15:58, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The permission at http://horrornews.net/about/logo/ is not compatible with Wikipedia. Eeekster (talk) 21:48, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Car1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 21 December 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Car1.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * "Image taken by self", but where? Does the country have freedom of panorama? Stefan2 (talk) 00:17, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Chains of Misery.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:03, 21 December 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Chains of Misery.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * No freedom of panorama in Iran. Sculptor still alive. Stefan2 (talk) 00:41, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ashfaq Ulla Khan (2).JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep.- F ASTILY  (TALK) 00:22, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Ashfaq Ulla Khan (2).JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Possibly a derivative work as subject died in 1927.  undefined — Bill william compton  Talk   01:29, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Dear Sir! This photo of Ashfaqulla Khan was provided to me by Late Prem Krishna Khanna - an accused in the Kakori conspiracy case of 1925. He is no more now. I have also used this photo in my research book (Swadhinta Sangram Ke Krantikari Sahitya Ka Itihas(Part-III) ISBN 8177831224 page no 863) and this photo is already in public domain. Please do not delete it as it is a rare photo of the great martyr who was hanged on 19 Dec 1927 at Faizabad Jail. Please help me. Thanks,Krantmlverma (talk) 13:15, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep: I have added the source in the image description with page no. Only the image description needed to be modified and that was done by me. Joyson Noel  Holla at me!  20:03, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Dead Body of Ashfaq405.JPEG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep.- F ASTILY  (TALK) 00:19, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Dead Body of Ashfaq405.JPEG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Possibly a derivative work as subject died in 1927.  undefined — Bill william compton  Talk   01:30, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Dear Sir! This photograph was published in 1927 and is available in so many books. It is already in public domain. I uploaded this photo on wikipedia by taking its image from my Nokia mobile. I urge you not to delete this historical image of a revolutionary who died for his motherland. Kindly help me to retain this image on wikipedia. Thanks.Krantmlverma (talk) 13:23, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 * If the image was published in a newspaper in 1927, as the image description claims, then it falls under PD-India. I would suggest that the licensing info be changed accordingly. It would also help if Mr. Verma would clarify which newspaper it was taken from, and the date of issue. Joyson Noel  Holla at me!  19:59, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * As suggested by you, the licensing permission has been changed by me today, kindlly remove the previous tag from its description page and keep this image. Thank you very much Mr Noel for providing me a help. RegardsKrantmlverma (talk) 10:15, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * You didn't state the publication date of the newspaper. Please do so, and then it shall be kept. Joyson Noel  Holla at me!  10:50, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Dear Mr Noel! As per your guidance the year of first publication (i.e.1927) of the photo was given on its description page & the previous tag was removed. Please see it. Thanks,Krantmlverma (talk) 16:35, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Date? Also, the source gives your name while it should give Pratap newspaper. Joyson Prabhu  Holla at me!  16:41, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:PhiMuAlphaSinfoniaOfficialPin.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:03, 21 December 2011 (UTC)


 * File:PhiMuAlphaSinfoniaOfficialPin.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Photo of fraternity pin is derivative work. No evidence that the pin is PD or freely licensed GrapedApe (talk) 03:55, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:ChuckD2.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:03, 21 December 2011 (UTC)


 * File:ChuckD2.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Source = CC-BY-NC, but the file information page says CC-BY. 10:25, 7 December 2011 (UTC)Stefan2 (talk)
 * This image was CC-BY three years ago. Licenses cannot be retroactively revoked by the copyright holder. — east718  &#124;  talk  &#124; 21:42, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 * We usually like to have evidence that this was so such as a review by bot or admin; after all, it is easy to mistake the CC licenses on Flickr. Don't know if this needs to be deleted, then. &mdash;innotata 15:59, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Area 51 28 August 1968 6.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 7 December 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Area 51 28 August 1968 6.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * license prohibits derivative works. Mgcsinc (talk) 10:46, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:16bitSonicuserbox.PNG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:03, 21 December 2011 (UTC)


 * File:16bitSonicuserbox.PNG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Derivative work. I don't think it's simple enough for PD-ineligible. Stefan2 (talk) 13:28, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Witchford Village College.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep.- F ASTILY  (TALK) 00:20, 21 December 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Witchford Village College.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * There is something fishy with the licensing of this image. The first revision says own work by User:Fr4zer. The user was indefinitely blocked in 2008. In 2009, an IP address removed the statement that it is own work by User:Fr4zer. Stefan2 (talk) 13:36, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep block over disruptive editing and what presumably is vandalism are not enough to question authorship. &mdash;innotata 15:56, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:RichardBronson.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:03, 21 December 2011 (UTC)


 * File:RichardBronson.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Formal studio portrait of subject of article. Author is listed as "U.S. Digital Gaming," but obviously a company can't take a picture. Name of photographer must be listed, along with release from this photographer indicating that photograph is suitably licensed for use in Wikipedia. Uploader states that he is not with U.S. Digital Gaming but with third party "agency," further calling into question whether claim of licensing is valid. ScottyBerg (talk) 16:38, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete unless evidence permission provided. Companies can hold copyright, and do not necessarily have to name photographers they commission in such cases, but there's definitely no evidence of permission here. &mdash;innotata 15:54, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Jackey Pete Lyle Bedford at Connors College.jpeg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete -- DQ  (t)   (e)  01:24, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Jackey Pete Lyle Bedford at Connors College.jpeg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Historical photo of some sort. Possibly copyrighted.  No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder.  Unlikely uploader is author  F ASTILY  (TALK) 22:14, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.