Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 February 13



File:Jeep sand castle advertisement at the New York International Auto Show.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:09, 27 February 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Jeep sand castle advertisement at the New York International Auto Show.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Derivative of non-free 3D artwork. The file was previously tagged with the license "non-free 3D art", said license was removed by . Kelly  hi! 00:54, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:HapoelscarfS.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: delete. Without the copyrighted graphics on the scarf, this would be just an insignificant blank scarf. As a derivative work, we already have other images of the concepts being illustrated, and thus as much as we would love to keep it around, unfortunately, we cannot. SchuminWeb (Talk) 07:14, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * File:HapoelscarfS.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Includes copyrighted logos. Kelly  hi! 02:07, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Per admin Fetchcomms and other users, Copyrighted portions are not the main subject of the photo and are a small enough part to fall under de minimis. See Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive670 Marokwitz (talk) 14:26, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:RamahshirtS.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: delete. Without the graphics on the shirt, these would just be insignificant blank t-shirts, and thus there would be no reason to use them to illustrate anything except maybe t-shirt. Thus it is the case that this is a derivative work of copyrighted artwork, and non-free as a result. SchuminWeb (Talk) 07:11, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * File:RamahshirtS.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Derivative of copyrighted artwork. Kelly  hi! 02:18, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Per admin Fetchcomms and other users, Copyrighted portions are not the main subject of the photo and are a small enough part to fall under de minimis. See Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive670 Marokwitz (talk) 14:26, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:C64 tera australia.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:09, 27 February 2011 (UTC)


 * File:C64 tera australia.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * No evidence depicted software is under free license. Kelly  hi! 04:56, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:C64 notemaker v10.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:09, 27 February 2011 (UTC)


 * File:C64 notemaker v10.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * No evidence depicted software is under free license. Kelly  hi! 04:57, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Century High School-aerial.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:09, 27 February 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Century High School-aerial.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * terraserver-usa.com isn't a United States Geological Survey employee. Uzma Gamal (talk) 13:26, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Freak kitchen logo.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:09, 27 February 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Freak kitchen logo.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Logo. &mdash; Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 14:29, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Nine1975.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:09, 27 February 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Nine1975.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Logo. &mdash; Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 14:30, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Rebuilt Euston Arch.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:09, 27 February 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Rebuilt Euston Arch.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Uploaded by User:Timloliver and tagged with . However, the description says it was "produced by Joe Robson", and the image caption in the Euston Arch article credits it to "Joe Robson/AVR London". The uploader's user name suggests that he is not Mr. Robson, so the self-authorship claim seems doubtful. —Bkell (talk) 18:13, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Backtrack desktop.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:09, 27 February 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Backtrack desktop.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * I cannot find any indication on the OS's website that it is freely licensed; the site says "© BackTrack Linux 2011". I've also not seen a Creative Commons-licensed Linux distro before, so the current copyright license is almost certainly incorrect. / ƒETCH COMMS  /  18:59, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

This is a screenshot from my computer desktop i am using the default wallpaper for this Linux OS. Staffwaterboy Critique Me 22:21, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * That's the problem - if the screenshot contains content that is unfree (which in this case is likely to be the OS interface, icons, and desktop background), then it has to be deleted. It doesn't matter if you took the screenshot, as you are taking a screenshot of another person's work. If my buddy draws a picture and I take a photo of that picture with my camera, I cannot claim the copyrights to my photo and license it as I wish. My buddy would still hold copyrights to my photo, as it is a photo of something that he created. ~Super Hamster  Talk Contribs 02:53, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Correct; Staffwaterboy, unless you can prove that the OS itself is freely licensed, the screenshot will need to be deleted. / ƒETCH COMMS  /  03:31, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Definitely doesn't appear to be freely licensed, but from the looks of their site it would be relatively easy to contact them, find out, and request permission to use screenshots on Wikipedia.  Swarm   X 06:48, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.