Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 February 14



File:SCCI-Logo.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:10, 27 February 2011 (UTC)


 * File:SCCI-Logo.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * school logo; no source; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude  ( talk ) 04:20, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Blagin.jpeg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:07, 28 February 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Blagin.jpeg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Image is cropped from this "Letter to the Russian people", published in 1935. Am I right in thinking that the image can be counted as an "anonymous or pseudonymous work"; and that Russian copyright for such works pre-2004 was 50 years, so the work would have come out of copyright by 1985, there would therefore be no U.S. copyright restored by the URAA, so the image can now be considered free? Jheald (talk) 13:14, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Emil lundberg.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:04, 28 February 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Emil lundberg.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Delete: uploader claims this is his own work but the exact same resolution image if found on this copyright webpage. ww2censor (talk) 15:47, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Diesel motor unit.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:01, 26 February 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Diesel motor unit.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Delete: uploader claims this to be his own work but the exact same image, found on the skyscrapercity website was apparently uploaded in December 2006. There is no evidence to connect this online image with the uploader. ww2censor (talk) 15:56, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mapaslovakrail.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:01, 26 February 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Mapaslovakrail.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Delete: uploader claims this to be his own work but tineye found a much higher resolution image with a watermark but the image appears to no longer be avialable from the skyscrapercity.com site. ww2censor (talk) 16:01, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Radoslavsuchy.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:04, 28 February 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Radoslavsuchy.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Delete: uploader claims this is his own work but is a copy of this Flickr image and there is no apparent connection between this uploader and the Flickr user. Based on this and other obvious copyvios all this uploader's images must be considered suspect. ww2censor (talk) 16:10, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Kulha.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 16 February 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Kulha.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Delete: uploader claims this is his own work but the image is found on this copyright webpage. Based on this and other obvious copyvios all this uploader's images must be considered suspect. ww2censor (talk) 16:15, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Files by Chris clements

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: delete all, with the execution carried out by Explicit. SchuminWeb (Talk) 22:20, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * File:JerezDLC060203.jpg
 * File:Tenisca151107f.jpg
 * File:Alcudia230705f.JPG
 * File:Olimpic Xativa050806b.jpg
 * File:Olimpic Xativa040806d.jpg
 * File:Extremadura3.JPG
 * File:Extremadura270806a.jpg
 * File:Extremadura270806c.jpg

Most of user uploads have been deletd already, see log, but a few still remained. Quick after account creation the user started uploading a few scans with dubious authorship information, recent uploads have information that clearly demonstrate that they are not own work files ('picture from defunct website'). I think files uploaded by Chris clements are not created by him and cant stay here. Same applies to the 4 files on Commons (File:Multiusos de San Lazaro.jpg, File:Eibar030205.jpg, File:Uplands StandBRFC.JPG, File:Albacete120405.jpg), I will care for them on Commons. --Martin H. (talk) 17:05, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.