Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 February 20



File:Street Musicians in Central Park.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  12:09, 21 February 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Street Musicians in Central Park.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Street Musicians in NYC.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:56, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:RoyRife-1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 6 March 2011 (UTC)


 * File:RoyRife-1.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * No sources justifying assumption, that this photo was published before January 1, 1923. Moreover source stated as Internet makes me wonder how it's possible for this file to stay on Wikipedia for almost 2 years. Lukasz Lukomski (talk) 03:30, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Royal Rife was born in 1888 meaning he would be 35 in 1923. He looks younger to my eye, but that's just me. --Selket Talk 18:43, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Here is a larger version of the same photo and you can see written at the bottom, &copy;-1930 H.H.D. I have no idea who H.H.D. is, but that gives us a date of 1930.  Of course, it's always possible that H.H.D. didn't renew the copyright, but if he did, it will be copyrighted until 2025 (but a few years before that, of course, Disney will lobby congress to extend it another 25 years). --B (talk) 13:27, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:OldEichmann.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 6 March 2011 (UTC)


 * File:OldEichmann.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Eichmann Adolf.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:24, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:ChuShogiPromotions.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 6 March 2011 (UTC)


 * File:ChuShogiPromotions.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:CSpromotions.png Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:35, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Metrode bogota.bmp

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 6 March 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Metrode bogota.bmp ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Computer rendering image of a future metro system claimed to be made by the uploader. However, the uploader was indefinitely blocked, and the image appears to be a screenshot from a video produced by a company for the Mayor of Bogota. 67.170.37.242 (talk) 10:44, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as per WP:CRYSTAL --Camilo Sanchez (talk) 06:22, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:100px-Acc-barnstar.svg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  15:09, 4 March 2011 (UTC)


 * File:100px-Acc-barnstar.svg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Tagged as Wikipedia-screenshot, though its obviously not (its a barnstar) Acather96 (talk) 14:47, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete It is an unused test file. --MGA73 (talk) 18:23, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:1337-neg1.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: deleted because it is on Commons (the licensing is fine) --B (talk) 13:46, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * File:1337-neg1.gif ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Claimed Wikipedia-screenshot, though its not (its a userbox) Acather96 (talk) 14:49, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. The template or can be used when you take a screenshot of a page on Wikipedia. You do not have to show the whole screenshot. You can crop out the part you want to show. In this case the crop shows a userbox but that does not mean that the license is wrong. If it only shows an image there should be a link to the original and the license should match the license on the file. Anyway in this case the file could be deleted because it is on Commons. --MGA73 (talk) 18:16, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 * It's a useless file, but the license is correct. I have deleted it because it is on Commons. --B (talk) 13:43, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2005Nov TR3 wikipedia files.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: deleted because it is on Commons (the licensing is fine) --B (talk) 13:48, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * File:2005Nov TR3 wikipedia files.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Claimed Wikipedia-screenshot, though its not - its a list of Wikipedia files Acather96 (talk) 14:53, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment Se above at . In this case it is from http://download.wikimedia.org (some wikimedia website). So the license is not perfect but I do not think it is very vrong. Anyway it is just text. File could be deleted because it is on Commons. --MGA73 (talk) 18:22, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Brendan Carr.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:04, 6 March 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Brendan Carr.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * No proof that the uploader is the copyright holder. I asked them if they were, indeed, the owner of the image, and they did not respond.  Corvus cornix  talk  22:15, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The uploader claims to be Brendan Carr's wife:  Corvus cornix  talk  22:18, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Based on that statement from the user, I'm inclined to accept the license as legitimate. If a new user just slaps a tag on an image with no indication of how they have the authority to do so, deletion is the obvious course of action, but this user has claimed to be his wife.  Even if she were to email m:OTRS, their standard of "proof" wouldn't be any higher than what we already have here - just an assertion of identity. --B (talk) 13:37, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Yes we OWN the image, it belongs to us, we are new to using Wiki and can only update this page when we have the time. Thankyou — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brendancarr (talk • contribs) 12:06, 6 July 2011 (UTC)