Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 January 16



File:Ajay-atul.jpeg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:36, 30 January 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Ajay-atul.jpeg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Copyright infringement of website   S Pat   talk 04:48, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Yehud-Emblem.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:36, 30 January 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Yehud-Emblem.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Corporate logo; source is he.wiki - which is redlinked there; doubtful uplaoder is the (c) holder Skier Dude  ( talk ) 04:50, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Prem Nazir and Sheela.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:41, 30 January 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Prem Nazir and Sheela.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).

Actually the original file is from another website which was really bad quality image. So I actually retouched the whole file, so it can't be included in one of copyrighted files --Vishalissac (talk) 19:49, 18 January 2011 (UTC) If u just watch it carefully you will understand what is restored in this image. If you feel like this file is inappropriate you can continue with your deletion.--Vishalissac (talk) 04:00, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * A still from an unspecified movie, claimed GFDL. No evidence, permissio is given as for 'non-commercial purpose'. Acather96 (talk) 08:25, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - minimal retouching does not allow a claim of ownership, if it does please point me to the detail. Off2riorob (talk) 19:11, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Check this file:The actual source file of this image is given here http://images.mathrubhumi.com/images/2011/Jan/16/03089_249878.jpg
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Cropped roger rabbit elmer fudd screen shot highlighted.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:29, 25 January 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Cropped roger rabbit elmer fudd screen shot highlighted.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).

Can someone please tell me what I did wrong, and what license I should have used? Please do-thank you. —Mavericker (talk) 2:25, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Unauthorized derivative work Acather96 (talk) 08:28, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, but it's already tagged as a non-free image. See Files for deletion/2011 January 17. —Bkell (talk) 19:25, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi-I am new here. I just gave more information about my screenshot. I was not sure what tag and liscense to use when I uploaded it- I used http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Upload. I thought is was non-free because it's a screenshot from a movie, that I got off of Youtube. I indicated what Youtube video I got it from on the image page- I drew a circle on it with MS Paint and Photoshop- I didn't try to edit the picture. When you click on the pic you can clearly see the image better: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Cropped_roger_rabbit_elmer_fudd_screen_shot_highlighted.jpg
 * The tags you placed on the image are appropriate, as far as they go. But I don't think the image should be here at all, because it seems to violate Wikipedia policy. Please see Files for deletion/2011 January 17 for a more thorough explanation, and contribute to the discussion there if you have anything to add. —Bkell (talk) 15:29, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Prem Nazir മാതൃഭൂമി.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:41, 30 January 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Prem Nazir മാതൃഭൂമി.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).

Actually this not the original file it has been retouched so it cannot included as on of the copyrighted issue file --Vishalissac (talk) 19:46, 18 January 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vishalissac (talk • contribs) 19:37, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Sourced to someone other than the uploader, claimed GFDL, permission only for 'non-commercial purpose' Acather96 (talk) 08:31, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Retouched? In what way? Its still not been retouched for you to claim ownership of it. Off2riorob (talk) 19:48, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * @^ have you seen the actual Image from the source site that I have given. If just look into the file details of the original file(I mean the source file) you will be able see the resolution and the quality of the file is really less. I have done lot noise reduction and a mild color correction in the above image. And one more thing the retouch doesn't mean that you have to make a b/w image to color image.--Vishalissac (talk) 18:37, 27 January 2011 (UTC)


 * delete - as per the nominators rational.Off2riorob (talk) 19:05, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * check this file :The source file of my restoration is given here http://images.mathrubhumi.com/images/2011/Jan/16/03089_249879.jpg just watch this file carefully and decide whether appropriate or inappropriate. If you feel like this file is inappropriate you can continue with your deletion.--Vishalissac (talk) 04:07, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Karakatsanis truck.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:41, 30 January 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Karakatsanis truck.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * No evidence this is GFDL licensed, seems highly unlikely. Originally tagged as non-free... J Milburn (talk) 16:20, 16 January 2011 (UTC)


 * I originally used the "Fair Use" choice out of courtesy. Mr. Karakatsanis (the manufacturer himself, who had taken the photo) has provided the image to me and Mr. Arvanitopoulos (as we both published books on the subject), thus there are no problems allowing its reproduction (actually on the contrary, the manufacturer wanted his work to be known). Skartsis (talk) 16:53, 16 January 2011 (UTC)


 * delete - we need permission from the copyright owner directly, you saying he gave it to you and its all ok is not a strong claim of release under a specific commons compatible license. Off2riorob (talk) 19:09, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Stpic.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: delete. While the freeness of this image is legitimately in question, converting it to non-free is not a viable solution in this case. Considering that File:720 Ste Rafka real pic.jpg exists, which is a free image of the same person, we have the case where the image is absolutely replaceable, and thus can't use a non-free image. SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:26, 30 January 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Stpic.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * No author given, publication place and date (200?) cannot be verified from the source. feydey (talk) 16:33, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * User:Elie plus uploaded this file to theworkofogdschildren.org, and then said that it was free to use because it was from theworkofgodschildren.org . Although theworkofgodschildren.org is a public domain website, this picture was originally from somewhere else. I saw it was used on the official St. Rafqa website. JBogdan (talk) 19:10, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Probably not the original source, but The vatican news services site is referencing this from 6/10/01 celebration - don't know the original author, but pretty clear not the cited source. Skier Dude  ( talk ) 02:58, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
 * keep until copyright status is elucidated, tagged for fair use in the saint's page Eli  +  18:18, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:29, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:WhitePassYukonRailroadMap.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:36, 30 January 2011 (UTC)


 * File:WhitePassYukonRailroadMap.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * There is no license and the text says "The map was made using an on-line map generating site... " That does not tell us much about the copyright. MGA73 (talk) 16:55, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Bob Schaffer parasailing.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:36, 30 January 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Bob Schaffer parasailing.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The file has no license but the text says "Papers of Congressman Bob Schaffer, CSU Archives and Special Collections + Public property". What is CSU? Is the file really PD? MGA73 (talk) 17:01, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mario Morina.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:14, 28 January 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Mario Morina.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The file is unfree, found on facebook, the rationale that it is promotional release is also dubious, there is no possible fair use rational for this pics use on wikpedia, I removed it from the infobox but the uploader replaced it saying it would be deleted if orphaned. imo that is what it needs, deleting. Subject is a footballer, a picture with a commons license is clearly possible. The uploader has also uploaded and added three or four similar pics to similar articles.Off2riorob (talk) 17:43, 16 January 2011 (UTC) Off2riorob (talk) 17:43, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:29, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:44 Parachute Engineer Regiment.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:36, 30 January 2011 (UTC)


 * File:44 Parachute Engineer Regiment.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * If you check http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Flashboard_2a.JPG you can see that it is fair use here so how would this be in the public domain? -- Addi hockey  10  e-mail 21:10, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

This includes

File:44_Signals_44.jpg

File:37_Field_Workshop_44.JPG

File:44 Maintenance 44.jpg

File:44 Anti Aircraft.JPG

File:101 Air Supply 44.jpg

File:18Light.JPG

-- Addi hockey  10  e-mail 21:15, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * delete all - no evidence of permission - this seems to assert they are likely to be anything but public domain. Unloader has failed to declare his source accurately enough to investigate his claim and he has not edited since this discussion opened. Off2riorob (talk) 19:40, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Screen.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:36, 30 January 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Screen.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Orphaned unused image with questionable copyright status. Admrboltz (talk) 23:33, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.