Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 January 21



File:JJhospital.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 4 February 2011 (UTC)


 * File:JJhospital.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Web resolution, no camera metadata, uploader talk page history of copyright problems. Kelly  hi! 00:26, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Patelhall.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 4 February 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Patelhall.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Web resolution, no metadata, uploader talk page history of copyright problems. Kelly  hi! 00:57, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:IFixit.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 4 February 2011 (UTC)


 * File:IFixit.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Tagged . The source page says (on the content licensing page) that it is licensed under the Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 license—note the "NC"! The "noncommercial" part of that license is not free enough for Wikipedia; see WP:NONCOM. It might be the case that this logo is simple enough to fall into the public domain under, or else there might be a rationale to use it under a claim of fair use. —Bkell (talk) 04:05, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Tripemb.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 4 February 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Tripemb.gif ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Seal of Tripura.gif Magog the Ogre (talk) 11:41, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Same rules apply, if it comes out that the image is okay, better to have just the single image at Commons, delete this one as duplication.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 09:29, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Shavo Odadjian 2001.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 4 February 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Shavo Odadjian 2001.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * No clear source - just a link to a web site's front page and the web site is down. I could not find the particular photo in an internet archive search.  Similar image from same web site was deleted a few years ago: Possibly unfree files/2008 March 22.  Wknight94 talk 14:51, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Totem Pole - 1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 4 February 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Totem Pole - 1.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * No authorship information on depicted 3D artwork. Kelly  hi! 15:46, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Keas human resource.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 4 February 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Keas human resource.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Based on the claim made, this staff breakdown by qualification is original research and may be based on unpublished company confidential information or represent an unauthorized analysis of an employee database not covered by the company's data protection registration (should it have one). Unless the source of the data is publicly available and can be cited and verified, the image should be deleted on the basis of potential commercial damage for the company involved. Fæ (talk) 17:54, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Naim Kyeziu.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 4 February 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Naim Kyeziu.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The author of this file is unknown. It is claimed that the author has died, but we have no evidence of that. Furthermore, because we have no knowledge of when the author died, we have no indication that it actually meets the qualifications for public domain per pd-old. Sh i r ik  ( Questions or Comments? ) 18:56, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:45, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Riza Lushta.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 4 February 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Riza Lushta.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The author of this file is unknown. It is claimed that the author has died, but we have no evidence of that. Furthermore, because we have no knowledge of when the author died, we have no indication that it actually meets the qualifications for public domain per pd-old. Sh i r ik  ( Questions or Comments? ) 18:59, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:45, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:014Paint- 1968.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: moved to Commons as File:The Williamsons 1965.jpg. SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:27, 4 February 2011 (UTC)


 * File:014Paint- 1968.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Uploader lists it as PD-Self from "personal collection" but states that it was taken by a newspaper in Wolverhampton "over 40 years ago", no evidence uploader owns the rights to the photo. Doug.(talk • contribs) 19:16, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * We received OTRS permission for this file. Jcb (talk) 11:04, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:008Love and Understanding.1967.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: moved to Commons as File:Love and Understanding 1967.jpg. SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:26, 4 February 2011 (UTC)


 * File:008Love and Understanding.1967.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).

Source. Image from my personal collection, and available on flickr. Provides no link to Flikr account nor evidence of ownership on the file page. If the uploader owned the rights to the photo and has released the photo into the public domain, then it should be migrated to Commons. Doug.(talk • contribs) 19:21, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * No evidence the uploader owns the rights to the photo. Uploader states: Taken over 40 years ago, by the newspaper Walsall Observer
 * We received OTRS permission for this file. Jcb (talk) 11:03, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:031Velvett Fogg.Telstar pic 1969 005.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: moved to Commons as File:Velvett Fogg 1969.jpg. SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:29, 4 February 2011 (UTC)


 * File:031Velvett Fogg.Telstar pic 1969 005.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Uploader has a history of uploading images allegedly of himself without evidence that he owns the rights to the photos. This one states: "The image is from my personal collection in flickr taken of the band in 1969. The image was originally from 40 years ago, taken by the publicity department of Pye Records."  Which suggests that Pye Records was the author and had the original rights.  Uploader must show that he has acquired those rights. Doug.(talk • contribs) 19:45, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I've e-mailed the uploader of this and the above two images, I think there's a misunderstanding regarding our requirements and what we need to establish ownership. It's quite possible the uploader either owns the rights to the images and just didn't give enough information or can obtain the rights as they are mostly of the user (and probably at least thought he owned them).--Doug.(talk • contribs) 22:48, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * We received OTRS permission for this file. Jcb (talk) 11:06, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:FaminetoFeast.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 4 February 2011 (UTC)


 * File:FaminetoFeast.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Unless uploader created the cover I think this is unfree. MGA73 (talk) 20:19, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Queen Elizabeth-1946.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 4 February 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Queen Elizabeth-1946.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Was also uploaded with different information, now deleted as duplicate. Seems unlikely that the uploader has the copyright for this image, user's other uploads include maps from 1910 tagged as self created instead of out of copyright. Peter E. James (talk) 21:01, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * For the benefit of commentators, the logs of the deleted version can be found here and the upload log of the contributor here. DrKiernan (talk) 18:53, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
 * This photograph seems to be a clip from a film/video or a scanned image?pebbens (talk) 21:40, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Lim kit siang.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 4 February 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Lim kit siang.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Small, web-resolution headshot, unlikely to be uploader's own work Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:12, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mathias Rust.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 4 February 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Mathias Rust.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Mr. Rust cann't be author of this photo. His copyrights on this photo is very disputed. The original author or his news agency (newspaper or etc.) must be specified at least. Alex Spade (talk) 21:53, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.