Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 January 7



File:Marvin Breckinridge broadcasting.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:25, 21 January 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Marvin Breckinridge broadcasting.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Photo at source is labeled is labeled "Courtesy of Marvin Breckinridge Patterson". The copyright info on the collection says that rights should be sought from the copyright holders. Kelly  hi! 03:34, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Also File:Marvin Breckinridge Patterson.jpg and File:A Frontier Nurse Rides Through the Rain.jpg from the same source. Kelly  hi! 03:36, 7 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. When I uploaded them in 2006, I misunderstood their copyright status. There may be an argument to be made for using one or two as Fair Use, as historical, since the article subject is famous specifically for her photos, but I don't know enough about her to choose the very most notable ones. --GRuban (talk) 14:02, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Richard Kleindienst.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:25, 21 January 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Richard Kleindienst.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * UPI photo from 1964. Kelly  hi! 04:06, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Robarts School for the Deaf Old Logo 001.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  23:27, 7 January 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Robarts School for the Deaf Old Logo 001.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Logo, doesn't seem simple enough to be released under the public domain. — ξ xplicit  11:24, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Robarts School for the Deaf New Logo 001.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  23:27, 7 January 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Robarts School for the Deaf New Logo 001.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Logo, doesn't seem simple enough to be released under the public domain. — ξ xplicit  11:24, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ranch Rush.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: procedural keep, though it may as well be deleted soon for lacking a fair use rationale. — ξ xplicit  01:04, 21 January 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Ranch Rush.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This is a screenshot of Ranch Rush. Does anyone know the license of this game? If it is not free it could perhaps be changed to fair use. MGA73 (talk) 11:31, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Someone just changed it to fair use, but without a rationale. multichill (talk) 11:46, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Int-p01.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:25, 21 January 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Int-p01.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Was deleted on Commons because copyright can not be verified Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Int-p01.jpg. MGA73 (talk) 17:18, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Otec oc t-s dia.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep. Doesn't appear to be a scan, no concrete reason to assume this is a copyright violation. — ξ xplicit  01:04, 21 January 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Otec oc t-s dia.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Appears to be a scan rather than self-created work, though it may be PD-ineligible. Please advise. Kelly  hi! 21:37, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment, I doubt it is a scan. The scan-like smudges are probably because the file is a .jpg. Reh  man  00:50, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.