Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 July 19



File:NAF Staff Battalion 01.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:07, 2 August 2011 (UTC)


 * File:NAF Staff Battalion 01.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The source link is dead, so I can't check myself, but I find it incredibally unlikely that the Latvian government would release photos under GFDL. Also, according to Commons' PD-LV-exempt template this isn't PD.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  00:00, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Craig mabbit taking a pic.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:07, 2 August 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Craig mabbit taking a pic.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * User claims bogus Creative Commons license for low resolution file. I have found at least two instances of the same image in higher resolution that have been uploaded elsewhere and possibly the exact same file from which the user took April 2009 (the image itself). I'm not saying either one owns the image, but for sure the wikipedia uploader does not. Discuss away. Fixer23 (talk) 00:09, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Faun.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:07, 2 August 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Faun.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Call me crazy, but this looks rather 3D to me B (talk) 00:34, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Hollywood undead new masks for american tragedy.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:07, 2 August 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Hollywood undead new masks for american tragedy.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The image is a promo image for the band's latest album, user claims ownership and ridiculous free art license. Uncropped version of this file posted in May  Possibly earlier at last.fm. This user definitely does not own the images they upload. Fixer23 (talk) 00:57, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Oregon state library.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:07, 2 August 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Oregon state library.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * I find no mention in Oregon's public records law of works of the state of Oregon being public domain.  In fact, I found a bill in 2009 that would have made works of the state government public domain - http://gov.oregonlive.com/bill/2009/HB3091/ - the bill did NOT pass and is not law. B (talk) 02:25, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Why can't a Wikipedian just take a picture of the library and it doesn't have to go though this. Copyvio Delete Secret account 04:07, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:JayDahl.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:07, 2 August 2011 (UTC)


 * File:JayDahl.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Copyright is by The Sporting News, close to a speedy Delete Secret account 03:11, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Kranti Geetanjali1199.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:07, 2 August 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Kranti Geetanjali1199.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Book cover not likely to have a CC license. Eeekster (talk) 03:54, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:KC-135RMAF.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F4 by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:04, 27 July 2011 (UTC)


 * File:KC-135RMAF.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Obviously scanned from a printed source Eeekster (talk) 04:34, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:QRN locomotives in the rail at bunbury street 21-6-2011.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:07, 2 August 2011 (UTC)


 * File:QRN locomotives in the rail at bunbury street 21-6-2011.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Appears to be capture from a webcam. Eeekster (talk) 04:54, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:The_Mavis's.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:07, 2 August 2011 (UTC)


 * File:The Mavis's.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The image is from MySpace and doesn't seem to explain why it's worthy of the license it's been given. Lachlanusername (talk) 05:10, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Admin.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:07, 2 August 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Admin.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Low resolution file. Possibly taken from some websites. Sreejith K (talk) 05:24, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Sputnik-screenshot.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:07, 2 August 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Sputnik-screenshot.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Orphaned. Is the uploader really the copyright holder of the entire webpage pictured? –Drilnoth (T/C) 13:57, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Starduster.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:07, 2 August 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Starduster.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Orphan - The file is not used on any pages in Wikipedia. Fortdj33 (talk) 17:02, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Baltimore Wiki.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:07, 2 August 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Baltimore Wiki.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Images come from sites at least some of which are "all rights reserved" or "downloading for personal non-commercial use only" and the like. The sites say some content is posted by third-parties, but I also don't see evidence that *they* release for other than for use on the cited site. Definitely not blanket "free license" and none of this would qualify as fair-use in the wikipedia sense. DMacks (talk) 18:51, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Paw paw tunnel.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:07, 2 August 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Paw paw tunnel.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The source website - http://mcmullans.org/canal/downloads.htm - says "If you're interested in using any of the pictures from this site, you have my permission." That is not the same thing as releasing the image into the public domain or granting a Wikipedia-appropriate viral permission.  (Simply saying "you can use my image" doesn't grant you the permission to redistribute it.) B (talk) 18:54, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Comic sans euro.png
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:07, 2 August 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Comic sans euro.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * It is doubtful that the uploader is the creator of this glyph. While the Euro sign is not copyrighted, this work derived from it may be original enough to be.  Sandstein   19:17, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I disagree. DS (talk) 12:37, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Commodore 128 001.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:07, 2 August 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Commodore 128 001.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Commodore 128 001.jpg. File is borderline eligible for fair use, and so should possibly be marked as such. Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:44, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.