Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 July 28



File:Cavendish-eudiometer.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:03, 11 August 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Cavendish-eudiometer.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * See Possibly unfree files/2011 July 27; permission to use the image has been denied, and since permission wasn't originally archived with OTRS we cannot verify that it was ever given. –Drilnoth (T/C) 00:09, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Blinded by water cannon.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:03, 11 August 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Blinded by water cannon.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This is a great image. However, it is not free.

1:FuR rationale #8 is that it is of iconic or historical importance


 * 1a: That is subjective and not backed up by any sources, time, or even a Google image search


 * 1b: "It is likely to become a historically significant image of this moment in German history, in line with images such as this one: File:Kent State" Shows that the uploader assumes it will be or wants to make an argument for it. It doesn't make it so.

2: Although this is a broader FuR issue not related to the given reasoning, the protests (which don't have an independent article) already has images even if they are not as emotive: File:MittlererSchlossgartenKundgebung 2010-10-01.jpg and File:StuttgartHauptbahnhofNordfluegel 2010-08-26.jpg. Although making a point about police misconduct is interesting, it is not necessary to convey something the prose could not.

3: Lack of a photographer credited or a date makes it hard to verify who actually owns this image. Did the publisher purchase the use of Getty? Is the photographer someone who seeks litigation often? Not enough info to cover either proper crediting or cover the Foundation's legal bases.

Cptnono (talk) 06:12, 28 July 2011 (UTC) Cptnono (talk) 06:12, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Paul H Brunner.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:03, 11 August 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Paul H Brunner.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Really own work? Leyo 13:27, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:M&D's Rollercoasters.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:03, 11 August 2011 (UTC)


 * File:M&D's Rollercoasters.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The images themselves lack individual sources. Based on their nature, I doubt they were all taken by the uploader. –Drilnoth (T/C) 14:22, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Datuk KRajagobal.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:03, 11 August 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Datuk KRajagobal.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This is not over 100 years old; no valid licensing information and permission. –Drilnoth (T/C) 23:06, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.