Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 June 13



File:Sabrejaw1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 27 June 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Sabrejaw1.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Higher resolution at this site. Orphaned, doubt PD licensing due to the existence of a higher-res version and the uploader's previous issues with image copyrights. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 14:23, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Sledge-energon.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 27 June 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Sledge-energon.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Photograph of a non-free toy. J Milburn (talk) 15:38, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Giwiki.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 27 June 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Giwiki.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Appears to be a company logo and is unused. Eeekster (talk) 18:12, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as a duplicate of File:Giwiki.png. Appears to be a version of this company's logo. But it makes me wonder if this passes the threshold of originality. It's fairly plain. Uses simple fonts and patters. Moray An Par (talk) 12:43, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:South Tower.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 27 June 2011 (UTC)


 * File:South Tower.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Painting, doubt self-gfdl claim Acather96 (talk) 19:26, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:File-Airshow.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 27 June 2011 (UTC)


 * File:File-Airshow.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Painting by an artist, doubt self-gfdl claim. Acather96 (talk) 19:27, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:PLO Detonation of Jets '71.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 27 June 2011 (UTC)


 * File:PLO Detonation of Jets '71.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Painting, doubt self-gfdl claim, orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 19:27, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:PierreDupont.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 27 June 2011 (UTC)


 * File:PierreDupont.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Looks like a screenshot from a video game, possibly non-free. Orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 19:47, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:ML1diagram.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep; concern addressed.- F ASTILY  (TALK) 00:13, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * File:ML1diagram.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).

either the contractor still owns the copyright or it is transferred to the gov agency (but the the agency owns it). Saibo ( Δ ) 23:02, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
 * This image is a US gov't contractor's work: According to
 * http://www.publicdomainsherpa.com/us-government-works.html section "The US may hold copyrights that are transferred to it".  And:
 * commons:Commons:Licensing

I have changed the copyright tag to PD-Pre1978, as the images were published without notice of copyright prior to 1978, and therefore are in the public domain. As such, I am removing the "Potentially Unfree" tag. Katana0182 (talk) 01:43, 14 June 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Fsv concept image.jpeg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep; concern addressed.- F ASTILY  (TALK) 00:13, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Fsv concept image.jpeg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).

either the contractor still owns the copyright or it is transferred to the gov agency (but the the agency owns it). Saibo ( Δ ) 23:04, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
 * This image is a US gov't contractor's work: According to
 * http://www.publicdomainsherpa.com/us-government-works.html section "The US may hold copyrights that are transferred to it".  And:
 * commons:Commons:Licensing

I have changed the copyright tag to PD-Pre1978, as the images were published without notice of copyright prior to 1978, and therefore are in the public domain. As such, I am removing the "Potentially Unfree" tag. Katana0182 (talk) 01:43, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Fsv core and circulator design.jpeg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep; concern addressed.- F ASTILY  (TALK) 00:13, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Fsv core and circulator design.jpeg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).

either the contractor still owns the copyright or it is transferred to the gov agency (but the the agency owns it). Saibo ( Δ ) 23:05, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
 * This image is a US gov't contractor's work: According to
 * http://www.publicdomainsherpa.com/us-government-works.html section "The US may hold copyrights that are transferred to it".  And:
 * commons:Commons:Licensing

I have changed the copyright tag to PD-Pre1978, as the images were published without notice of copyright prior to 1978, and therefore are in the public domain. As such, I am removing the "Potentially Unfree" tag. Katana0182 (talk) 01:43, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Fsv systems diagram.jpeg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep; concern addressed.- F ASTILY  (TALK) 00:13, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Fsv systems diagram.jpeg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).

either the contractor still owns the copyright or it is transferred to the gov agency (but the the agency owns it). Saibo ( Δ ) 23:06, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
 * This image is a US gov't contractor's work: According to
 * http://www.publicdomainsherpa.com/us-government-works.html section "The US may hold copyrights that are transferred to it".  And:
 * commons:Commons:Licensing

I have changed the copyright tag to PD-Pre1978, as the images were published without notice of copyright prior to 1978, and therefore are in the public domain. As such, I am removing the "Potentially Unfree" tag. Katana0182 (talk) 01:43, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.