Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 May 16



File:Hagan.Futureproofg Cities.small.tiff

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:11, 30 May 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Hagan.Futureproofg Cities.small.tiff ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * No evidence of claimed license, or that the uploader would be the license holder. According to this site author is Swen Geiss. The image also appears here without any indication of CC-BY-SA license. Elekhh (talk) 06:58, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:East Asiamap.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:11, 30 May 2011 (UTC)


 * File:East Asiamap.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Claimed as CC_BY-SA but it's authorship is claimed as Casino Executive network which is not the uploader. Also this look like a map produced within Wikipedia/Commons anyway.. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:40, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per my rationale at the talk page — MacMed tagged it as a copyvio, but I declined it for two reasons: (1) This image is of a format identical to many of our other maps, meaning that the image may have been derived from an image already on the WMF servers. If so, there's a possibility that the source image is cc-sa or cc-by-sa, rendering worthless any copyright claims with more extensive restrictions.  (2) The URL of the source image includes "wp-content", which further makes me wonder about the connection between this image and Wikipedia in the mind of the blogger.  Put together, these factors mean that it's not a blatant copyvio, but they do raise enough doubt that we shouldn't assume that it's a free image.  Nyttend (talk) 03:31, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Briz Tagum.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:11, 30 May 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Briz Tagum.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Claimed as self, but image contains a clear watermark. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:36, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Merritt Island Dragon.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:03, 8 June 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Merritt Island Dragon.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).

Image has a watermark, giving an author name which is not obvious as that of the uploader. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:53, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Image of a sculpture (now destroyed) taken in the US post 1968,
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Bosnjaci.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:49, 1 June 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Bosnjaci.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Incomplete source information on this montage of many images. In particular, I suspect that not all of the newer images - which happen to also be the ones which are not sourced - are likely to be under a free license. (ESkog)(Talk) 13:55, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Uploader has now added sourcing, many to the Bosnian Wikipedia. Several of those images, however, are indeed tagged as copyrighted and used under fair use. Thus, the work as a whole cannot be freely licensed. (ESkog)(Talk) 14:35, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Artwork&sculptures-gallery.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:03, 8 June 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Artwork&sculptures-gallery.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Works shown are not the work of the uploader... Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:24, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Sculptures in gallery 2.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:03, 8 June 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Sculptures in gallery 2.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Claimed as own photo by uploader, however works shown are not those of the uploader. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:26, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Collage mott.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:03, 8 June 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Collage mott.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Works shown are not those uploader. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:27, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Toby Mott it's true 2008.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:03, 8 June 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Toby Mott it's true 2008.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Work shown not that of uploader Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:29, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Riptide logo.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:49, 1 June 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Riptide logo.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Logo, doubt PD-self claim, orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 19:30, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Dispatch.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  12:10, 17 May 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Dispatch.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * User uploaded a string of copyright violations surrounding this file, so I'm suspicious of this one. &mdash; Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 19:38, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Newestseal.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep with license as corrected. Skier Dude ( talk ) 01:35, 1 June 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Newestseal.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * School seal, doubt PD-self claim. Acather96 (talk) 19:39, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Talk-page has comment from uploader asserting that he is the creator and retains ability to release. However, the terms he specifies are not "free" (restricts purpose and/or manner of use), and they especially are not consistent with the "PD" tag he added. However, even if it's not free and we're not convinced of his ownership of license (sounds like a job for WP:OTRS) and no matter how restrictive it might be claimed, it could be tagged as with FUR as official logo for the school for use in the school-article's infobox. DMacks (talk) 03:22, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:11, 30 May 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:The Startugs Fanart.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:49, 1 June 2011 (UTC)


 * File:The Startugs Fanart.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Unauthorized derivative work of TV show characters, claimed PD-self, only used in userspace. Acather96 (talk) 19:44, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Aci Catena-Stemma.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:11, 30 May 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Aci Catena-Stemma.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This page states that the image is released under fair use, but the image is tagged as being under the GFDL. Acather96 (talk) 19:54, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Cbar lion.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:11, 30 May 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Cbar lion.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Some kind of school logo (according to this article), doubt self-GFDL claim. Acather96 (talk) 20:01, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Seraleks.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:03, 8 June 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Seraleks.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).

PUF as I'm not sure it's uploaders 'self' work as claimed. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:02, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Was tagged for deletion, but uploder added possible web source,
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Chitty.png
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F3 by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:08, 17 June 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Chitty.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Although tagged as GFDL, Permission field states Wikipedia only. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:03, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep or whatever it's called here — this is effectively a multilicense of use-it-under-GFDL or only use it on Wikipedia. Anyone may impose any permission statement on an image, regardless of how restrictive, as long as they also add a free license or other permission statement that amounts to a free license.  Nyttend (talk) 03:29, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * How do we know that dual-licensing was the uploader's intention? –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 16:23, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Chitty Temple.png
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F3 by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:08, 17 June 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Chitty Temple.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Although tagged as GFDL,Permission field says Wikipedia only. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:04, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep or whatever it's called here — this is effectively a multilicense of use-it-under-GFDL or only use it on Wikipedia. Anyone may impose any permission statement on an image, regardless of how restrictive, as long as they also add a free license or other permission statement that amounts to a free license.  Nyttend (talk) 03:29, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * How do we know that dual-licensing was the uploader's intention? –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 16:24, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Monroe hybrid.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  12:10, 17 May 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Monroe hybrid.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * User has uploaded many copyvios before. (see Dispatch.JPG above) &mdash; Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 22:12, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.