Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 May 21



File:W810.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:05, 10 June 2011 (UTC)


 * File:W810.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Image of a mobile phone, which is non-free. Claimed PD-self, orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 05:29, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Bimlogo.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:05, 10 June 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Bimlogo.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Logo, summary says "this logo is not for all uses please email the author for using it... thank you. ". Clashes with the PD-self claim, orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 05:35, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Bethel.1.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:09, 17 June 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Bethel.1.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Photograph of a painting. Apparently the permission of the artist has been obtained, apparently, however I doubt he released into the public domain as the PD-self tag claims. Orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 05:37, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Bethel Church.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:09, 17 June 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Bethel Church.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * See above. Acather96 (talk) 05:37, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:UPVanguardFraternity.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:05, 10 June 2011 (UTC)


 * File:UPVanguardFraternity.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Some kind of badge, possibly copyrighted. Orphaned and claimed PD-self. Acather96 (talk) 05:57, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:DRSAB 01.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:09, 17 June 2011 (UTC)


 * File:DRSAB 01.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Image is the same as that on the Supreme Court website:http://www.supremecourt.lk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=174  obi2canibe talk contr 11:52, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Pomplun-Stanford-Park-Hotel-2006.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F3 by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:04, 6 June 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Pomplun-Stanford-Park-Hotel-2006.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Looks like the credited Esther Dyson is a professional journalist; I doubt that the uploader is said person. No source beyond the author, so no way to verify CC licensing. I can't think of a FUR that would work for the image's current use, so, delete. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 23:17, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for your help. Since the file is linked to Esther's original page and is under Creative Commons, can you let me know what we need to change to make it correctly formatted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Souvanna (talk • contribs) 04:19, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for linking the original source. Unfortunately, it looks like the original file, although available under a Creative Commons license, uses the noncommercial license, which Wikipedia's policies do not allow. Unless you can contact the original uploader and request that they apply a permissible license (see Requesting copyright permission), the image will need to be deleted. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 11:12, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:SotIS Gameplay2.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:05, 10 June 2011 (UTC)


 * File:SotIS Gameplay2.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Video game screenshot. Presumably non-free. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 23:29, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:76652 1677843787488 1279290793 1824387 1031840 n.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep. After Midnight 0001 11:40, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
 * File:76652 1677843787488 1279290793 1824387 1031840 n.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The file name gives the appearance that the photo was saved off Facebook or another similar site (naming conventions are clearly another issue with the file). The description of the photo also appears to be spamming Jamieson's name. Still yet, the uploader is the major contributor to the Andrew Stewart Jamieson article, who is the man in the image. Either the uploader is simply a fan that follows Jamieson's Facebook account, stealing the image from there not the actual copyright holder of this image as claimed, or he is personal friends with Jamieson and could possibly have taken the photo and be the copyright holder. However, the second option leads to other issues about neutrality and notability when a close friend creates edits an article about a person. It should pointed out that the Jamieson article had been deleted before because of those types of issues. Dave Pritchard (talk) 23:46, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.