Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 November 1



File:Finance Minister 1993.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:08, 23 November 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Finance Minister 1993.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * orphaned, appears to be a scan of a newspaper, ergo no PD-self possible Skier Dude  ( talk ) 05:35, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ssr-1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:08, 23 November 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Ssr-1.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * no source, given use in artice it's possibly a publicity shot or a still from the film Skier Dude  ( talk ) 05:36, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Uttaran-Veer-Iccha.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:03, 15 November 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Uttaran-Veer-Iccha.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Uttaran-Veer-Iccha.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) 09:18, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Tina Dutta.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:03, 15 November 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Tina Dutta.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * same uploader as my nomination immediately above; cf. commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Uttaran-Veer-Iccha.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) 09:19, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Alain nas.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:03, 15 November 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Alain nas.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Looks like a cropped photo, no EXIF or claim of ownership besides PD-self tag. Orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 20:08, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Alexander Mack.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:03, 15 November 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Alexander Mack.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Strongly doubt this is user-created, orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 20:10, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Alanyacastle.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F3 by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:03, 15 November 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Alanyacastle.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Conflicting licensing, marked as being for non-commercial use here - unacceptable license? Acather96 (talk) 20:23, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Lot b763 sp-lpc warsaw 111101 1-1-.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free.- F ASTILY  (TALK) 21:23, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Lot b763 sp-lpc warsaw 111101 1-1-.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The uploader seems not to understand the concept of free licensing, as per User_talk:EmadIV. While we could keep the photo under WP:FAIRUSE, I think that his addition of free licenses are not correct, as the photo is most likely fully copyrighted (Reuters/Peter Andrew). Note to closing admin: please fair use this photo instead of deleting it unless a truly free image has been uploaded. Or at least notify me that that the photo will be deleted, and I'll add the FU stuff myself. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; talk to me 22:00, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm not entirely convinced that there isn't a free equivalent image available. Based on the number of youtube videos added there was a substantial crowd that saw this thing land and had video cameras with them.  I have to believe that at least one or two had a still camera and these images will filter into free channels within the next couple of days.Ravendrop 16:45, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete this is a copyright violation, and is not able to be used under WP:NFCC as plenty of photos exist which could reasonably be obtained under a free licence as per this and |||||||1|||||SP-LPC||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| this. Luckily, I am already in correspondence with several of these photographers, from couple of weeks ago, for use of their images on Commons. The file should be deleted. Russavia Let's dialogue 10:58, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep The pictures given from airliners.net are clearly copyrighted. This picture was taken from a YouTube video and imported into the article. That video was uploaded by the Reuters channel, but the uploader did not claim any copyright. Finally, YouTube is a free video hosting website, meaning any image shot is reasonably licensed under a free license, unless the owner states otherwise. If I'm incorrect in anything here, post back or write on my talk page. EmadIV (talk) 19:01, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete image is credit to a commercial photo agency (Reuters) so really should not be used per NFCC#2 Respect for commercial opportunities. MilborneOne (talk) 19:11, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete We have a pic of the airplane in question, so the non-free pic should be deleted post haste.--Cesario (JPN) (talk) 00:05, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment The image, in my opinion, qualifies as Fair Use. It was found and taken from YouTube. EmadIV (talk) 14:44, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Done as suggested. I think.--Cesario (JPN) (talk) 07:42, 17 November 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:CarolMoseleyBraun.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:03, 15 November 2011 (UTC)


 * File:CarolMoseleyBraun.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Source link goes to a bare URL with no authorship information. (The other version in history is a crop of File:Carol Moseley Braun NZ.jpg). Kelly  hi! 23:44, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Sagittaria.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 25 November 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Sagittaria.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Credited to a US government agency, but sourced to another website (gimpsavvy.com). I'm not sure whether or not that is a reliable source for passing on public domain images. Kelly  hi! 23:54, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. The image can also be found on the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service's website here. I believe this is public domain. Angela. 00:10, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Gilmore2.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:01, 25 November 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Gilmore2.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Dead source, no authorship information. Kelly  hi! 23:56, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. The source being dead isn't a reason to delete an free image that was uploaded by a trusted user and is still in use on an article. The source can still be found in the Internet Archive. Angela. 00:14, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Does the archive info show authorship/publication/copyright information on the photo? I haven't been able to find it. This information has to be verifiable. Kelly  hi! 00:41, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Gilmore3.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:01, 25 November 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Gilmore3.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Dead source, no authorship information. Kelly  hi! 23:57, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - as above. Angela. 00:14, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.