Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 October 9



File:Filename.jpeg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:03, 23 October 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Filename.jpeg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Almost certainly a scan from a text book. Danger (talk) 10:27, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Renault-megane-screenshot-1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:03, 23 October 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Renault-megane-screenshot-1.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Apparently grabbed from unfree software or web page. Source description is bizarre and unhelpful.  Simraceway does not appear to be free in any way. Wknight94 talk 11:14, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Wheelsontcf.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:20, 24 October 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Wheelsontcf.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Includes unsourced "public doman clip" MilborneOne (talk) 17:25, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * In 2008 upon making the graphic, I was aware of WP policies and what public domain meant. But I do not have a trace for the original. I have had long experience in respecting public domain in hang gliding, but did not post the source which is suspected to be from my owned Low & Slow or a then WikiCommons image, not sure. I will not put in the many hours I suspect it would take to search for the source. I am sensitive to PD issues and would not have transgressed; but I respect that WP cannot go with self affirmations. Joefaust (talk) 18:14, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Thriplowmap.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep.- F ASTILY  (TALK) 00:32, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Thriplowmap.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This is apparently licensed under the OS OpenData license, so the tag is incorrect. The OS OpenData license may not be sufficiently free for Wikipedia; it has requirements such as "[you must] ensure that you do not mislead others or misrepresent the Information or its source." If this license is free enough for Wikipedia, we should probably make a licensing tag for it. —Bkell (talk) 19:03, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment: Let's check it against the definition of free cultural works:
 * Freedom to use? Check. "You are encouraged to use and re-use the Information that is available under this licence, the Open Government License, freely and flexibly, with only a few conditions."
 * Freedom to study? Check. Included in above statement.
 * Freedom to make and redistribute copies? Check. "You are free to: ... copy, publish, distribute and transmit the Information; ... exploit the Information commercially."
 * Freedom to make changes and improvements? Check. "You are free to: ... adapt the information."
 * The only restrictions are proper attribution and some legal disclaimers. So the license appears to be Free enough for us, and a template should be created. -- King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 23:08, 10 October 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Uploads by Eugen Simion 14

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: delete all. — ξ xplicit  22:10, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * File:MingMing.jpg
 * File:Puffin23.jpg
 * File:Fluture enya.gif
 * File:Flower222.jpg

Today I found evidences that dozens photos uploaded by him were copyvios, including few transferred to commons or uploded by him. His real photos were made by camera model DSC-W90 and cellphone model Z530i. The rest taken by different cameras of without EXIF were photos that he found on web and published there with false self-made statement and license.--Oleola (talk) 20:08, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Accused of Kakori Case1925.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:03, 23 October 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Accused of Kakori Case1925.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * As mentioned in the description of the file, picture is taken from some book, thus a derivative work, possibly a non-free image.  undefined — Bill william compton  Talk   22:01, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:LalaHarDayal294.GIF

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:03, 23 October 2011 (UTC)


 * File:LalaHarDayal294.GIF ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Image doesn't seem to be a work of user, a retouched version of some another work.  undefined — Bill william compton  Talk   22:04, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.