Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 April 9



File:AngryDadwhatadaymaybetheheadlineswillcheermeup.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 17 April 2012 (UTC)


 * File:AngryDadwhatadaymaybetheheadlineswillcheermeup.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Looks like Homer Simpson to me. Eeekster (talk) 01:36, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Thatsopinionnotnews.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 17 April 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Thatsopinionnotnews.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * From a Simpsons episode. Eeekster (talk) 02:15, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Popgoestheeyeballs.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 17 April 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Popgoestheeyeballs.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * From a Simpsons episode. Eeekster (talk) 02:15, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Baguio montage.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 17 April 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Baguio montage.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Orphaned image is a montage of several photos, no source or license given for the individual photos. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 15:20, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Bakersfalls worldsend.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 17 April 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Bakersfalls worldsend.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Orphaned image is made up of two photos without specific source and license for each. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 15:26, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Balkans Express in İstanbul.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 17 April 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Balkans Express in İstanbul.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Image is sourced to imageshack.com which is usually composed of copyright images. I could not find a better link, but I do not believe the uploader has the rights to this photo. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда .  15:43, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Gil Noble.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: procedural close as wrong venue. Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:07, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 * File:Gil Noble.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * I don't know the rationale for use seems pretty sketchy. This needs the attention of someone with copyright expertise. Wlmg (talk) 16:13, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Image is credited to Tim Soter Wireimage here: --Wlmg (talk) 16:22, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure I understand the problem. The picture has a copyright notice and a FUR. Fair-use photos of dead people are used in many articles. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 16:32, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Close as invalid Image is tagged as non-free. If you think that it doesn't comply with WP:NFCC for some reason, take it to WP:Ffd or WP:NFR instead. That said, non-free photos of dead people in the infobox in articles about the said people are normally considered compliant with WP:NFCC unless free photos are known to exist. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:22, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Habib azar.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 17 April 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Habib azar.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Uploaded with a self GFDL/cc-by-sa-3.0 release but the image appears to be a scan from a magazine or leaflet with an unclear source "hp" MilborneOne (talk) 19:18, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Zhuchanghe Bridge.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep and tag as missing permission. Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:58, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 * File:Zhuchanghe Bridge.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).
 * File:Yanjinhe River Beam Bridge.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).
 * File:Qingshuihe Railway Bridge.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).
 * File:Luojiaohe Bridge.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).
 * File:Wuxi Bridge.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).
 * File:Yanjinhe arch bridge.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).
 * File:Jiangjiehe Bridge.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).
 * File:Hutiaohe Bridge.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).
 * File:Xisha Bridge.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).
 * File:Glade Creek Bridge.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).
 * File:Shuanghekou Bridge.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Claimed to be copied from "HighestBridges.com", but also claimed to be own work. The files need OTRS. See WP:CONSENT for instructions. Stefan2 (talk) 19:51, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:ScythianC14AsiaEuropeFig6SketchEn.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep - credibly asserted to be self-created. Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:54, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 * File:ScythianC14AsiaEuropeFig6SketchEn.gif ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Appears to be a scan from a book. Stefan2 (talk) 20:38, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * In scientific publications, only artwork can be protected, not the contents, and the artwork is entirely original and mine, after the contents of the publication. The resemblance is contentual, not a scan. My artworkis is GFDL. This illustration has already been reviewed for infringement and resolved as GFDL. Please refer to deletion discussion and resolution, unfortunately I have not retained the link or date, it was quite a while ago. Barefact (talk) 08:13, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I found the resolution:

Barefact (talk) 08:20, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep, as noted in the image description, this has "separate presentation artwork", which I take to be a statement of "I made my own way of representing these data". If that's correct (and I have no reason to say that it's not), this is not at all a problematic image.  There's no way that factual content is subject to copyright; you can't sue for copyright violation just because I used some numbers that you researched and published.  Nyttend (talk) 03:24, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Connemara.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 April 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Connemara.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Is this really own work? Seems to be a professional painting by an unidentified painter. Stefan2 (talk) 20:59, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Engelbert Dollfuss.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 April 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Engelbert Dollfuss.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Appears to have been taken less than 100 years ago by an anonymous photographer who died more than 100 years ago. Stefan2 (talk) 21:42, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Berenice.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 April 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Berenice.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Dubious if this is free enough. Stefan2 (talk) 22:02, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Teletype Corporation advertisement for the Model 28 Line of Equipment.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep - ads from before 1989 rarely carried a copyright notice, so the assertion that there is none present is entirely credible. Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:11, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 * File:Teletype Corporation advertisement for the Model 28 Line of Equipment.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Claimed to be public domain with a reasoning based on the fact that the trademark representing the company is no longer trademark-protected. However, since copyright and trademark are entirely different things, this is hardly a valid argument for PD. Might conceivably be PD for some other reason (non-renewal etc.). Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:17, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The company that created this document, Teletype Corporation, ceased to exist in 1990. Who would hold the copyright? Wa3frp (talk) 00:04, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Someone else, unclear who. There is always someone who takes over intellectual property rights of defunct companies. That's not the point here. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:38, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I recheck the original document from 1960. While it carries a trademark (R), it does not carry a copyright.  Additionally, all of the referenced equipment in the photo is technically obsolete and the creating company ceased to function in 1990. A further check of the Internet did not turn up any additional copyright claims. Wa3frp (talk) 01:28, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * If the company went out of business in 1990, it might have had more important things to do in 1988 than to renew the copyright of an unimportant ad. PD-US-not renewed sounds very possible. Additionally, if there is no copyright mark on the ad, it is out of copyright for that reason too. --Stefan2 (talk) 09:51, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ssc2006-05b.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 April 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Ssc2006-05b.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The source link is dead so impossible to prove that it is an NASA image. Stefan2 (talk) 22:22, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Spidey.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 April 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Spidey.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Madame Tussauds museums exist in multiple countries and not all countries have FOP inside buildings. The country is unknown. I'm not even convinced that this is a wax doll. Stefan2 (talk) 22:28, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Its not a wax doll. Its promotional art for the first movie. Its for computer wallpapers and some Movie Posters and DVD covers Definitely not free, definitely not from Madame Tussauds.  -- Тимофей ЛееСуда .  23:04, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Richthofen.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 April 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Richthofen.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Claimed to be in the public domain because it is a photo of Heinrich Hoffmann. However, not all photos by him are in the public domain, and there is no link to the National Archives, so it is not possible to verify the licence for this particular photo. Stefan2 (talk) 22:59, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:California Gnatcatcher.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 April 2012 (UTC)


 * File:California Gnatcatcher.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Source link is dead. No way to prove that this really is a government work. Stefan2 (talk) 23:55, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.