Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 February 1



File:SacredHeartCathedralOfShenyang.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:04, 15 February 2012 (UTC)


 * File:SacredHeartCathedralOfShenyang.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Something is fishy here. Free licences are listed but so are the words "fair use rationale" (although no rationale is given). Stefan2 (talk) 01:36, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi Stefan2, the picture is taken by me. About license, well I'm not clear about the fair use rationale. What rationale I should give? roscoe_x (talk) 06:30, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Since you took the photo yourself and licensed it under a free licence, it doesn't need any fair use rationale. In fact, it is confusing if the picture mentions fair use rationales when none is needed. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:46, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ihsankhairir profile.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 15 February 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Ihsankhairir profile.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The text "to be used to represent the user only" sounds like a restriction to the use of this image. Stefan2 (talk) 01:38, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Jayne Mansfield's death car.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F4 by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:04, 4 February 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Jayne Mansfield& ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * No copyright tag was placed. I do not believe the user was the photographer. Sumanch (talk) 02:26, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Demott-rachel.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 15 February 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Demott-rachel.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Without source Bulwersator (talk) 07:34, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:ABAKE.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 15 February 2012 (UTC)


 * File:ABAKE.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * I tagged this with "no source". The uploader removed the tag, but I still don't think that the image is sourced. The page states: "For any reuse or distribution of this image, please attribute with at least the photographer's name Åbäke along with the license information". Åbäke is not a personal name but a noun which you can find in a dictionary. Due to its negative meaning, no one would ever dream about using it as a name for their children. Stefan2 (talk) 11:22, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:CoolGarfield.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 15 February 2012 (UTC)


 * File:CoolGarfield.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Ridiculous situation ("There is no loss of commercial use by presenting these photographs (rather, the intended commercial use is enhanced by its presentation here)"), but: No FOP for statues in USA, no evidence that this statue is in PD, there is a fair use rationale but file is used in a gallery Bulwersator (talk) 13:55, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:PopcornEaterGarfield.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 15 February 2012 (UTC)


 * File:PopcornEaterGarfield.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Ridiculous situation ("There is no loss of commercial use by presenting these photographs (rather, the intended commercial use is enhanced by its presentation here)"), but: No FOP for statues in USA, no evidence that this statue is in PD, there is a fair use rationale but file is used in a gallery Bulwersator (talk) 13:55, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:CollegeBoundGarfield.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 15 February 2012 (UTC)


 * File:CollegeBoundGarfield.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Ridiculous situation ("There is no loss of commercial use by presenting these photographs (rather, the intended commercial use is enhanced by its presentation here)"), but: No FOP for statues in USA, no evidence that this statue is in PD, there is a fair use rationale but file is used in a gallery Bulwersator (talk) 13:55, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:HealthAndFitnessGarfield.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 15 February 2012 (UTC)


 * File:HealthAndFitnessGarfield.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Ridiculous situation ("There is no loss of commercial use by presenting these photographs (rather, the intended commercial use is enhanced by its presentation here)"), but: No FOP for statues in USA, no evidence that this statue is in PD, there is a fair use rationale but file is used in a gallery Bulwersator (talk) 13:55, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:DoctorGarfield.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 15 February 2012 (UTC)


 * File:DoctorGarfield.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Ridiculous situation ("There is no loss of commercial use by presenting these photographs (rather, the intended commercial use is enhanced by its presentation here)"), but: No FOP for statues in USA, no evidence that this statue is in PD, there is a fair use rationale but file is used in a gallery Bulwersator (talk) 13:56, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:SwayzeSpeedkingGarfield.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 15 February 2012 (UTC)


 * File:SwayzeSpeedkingGarfield.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Ridiculous situation ("There is no loss of commercial use by presenting these photographs (rather, the intended commercial use is enhanced by its presentation here)"), but: No FOP for statues in USA, no evidence that this statue is in PD, there is a fair use rationale but file is used in a gallery Bulwersator (talk) 13:56, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:FirefighterGarfield.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 


 * File:FirefighterGarfield.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Ridiculous situation ("There is no loss of commercial use by presenting these photographs (rather, the intended commercial use is enhanced by its presentation here)"), but: No FOP for statues in USA, no evidence that this statue is in PD, there is a fair use rationale but file is used in a gallery Bulwersator (talk) 13:56, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:13, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Fair use rationale appeared, so I am withdrawing my nomination Bulwersator (talk) 05:04, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:IceCreamEaterGarfield.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 15 February 2012 (UTC)


 * File:IceCreamEaterGarfield.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Ridiculous situation ("There is no loss of commercial use by presenting these photographs (rather, the intended commercial use is enhanced by its presentation here)"), but: No FOP for statues in USA, no evidence that this statue is in PD, there is a fair use rationale but file is used in a gallery Bulwersator (talk) 13:56, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:GasWorkerGarfield.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 15 February 2012 (UTC)


 * File:GasWorkerGarfield.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Ridiculous situation ("There is no loss of commercial use by presenting these photographs (rather, the intended commercial use is enhanced by its presentation here)"), but: No FOP for statues in USA, no evidence that this statue is in PD, there is a fair use rationale but file is used in a gallery Bulwersator (talk) 13:56, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:DufferGarfield.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 15 February 2012 (UTC)


 * File:DufferGarfield.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Ridiculous situation ("There is no loss of commercial use by presenting these photographs (rather, the intended commercial use is enhanced by its presentation here)"), but: No FOP for statues in USA, no evidence that this statue is in PD, there is a fair use rationale but file is used in a gallery Bulwersator (talk) 13:56, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Gillette Fusion ProGlide Power.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:13, 1 February 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Gillette Fusion ProGlide Power.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Unused, probably unfree derivative of copyrighted work Bulwersator (talk) 14:13, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Henrys.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 15 February 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Henrys.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This image is all over the internet, never credited, and I can't find the original source. But the uploader has uploaded dozens of copyvios, and I doubt this is legit. – Quadell (talk) 16:28, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.