Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 February 27



File:Counterfeit toys.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  12:08, 11 March 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Counterfeit toys.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Probably not free as stated because of the giant derivative work of Pikachū. Stefan2 (talk) 00:57, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Slavisa Jokanovic Partizan.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:04, 10 March 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Slavisa Jokanovic Partizan.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Appears to be scanned from a card. Eeekster (talk) 02:20, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:SA Torch of Friendship.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:04, 10 March 2012 (UTC)


 * File:SA Torch of Friendship.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Derivative work of a 2002 sculpture. No FOP in USA. GrapedApe (talk) 03:42, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:James H Trainor NASA Badge 1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Wrong Forum; this is an issue that belongs at WP:FFD, not WP:PUF, which is intended to resolve the copyright status of a file- F ASTILY  (TALK) 10:45, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
 * File:James H Trainor NASA Badge 1.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).
 * File:James H Trainor NASA Badge 2.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Without source, unable to fix this problem Bulwersator (talk) 06:35, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment he's dead, so a FUR can also be written. It's an NASA ID badge, so a creation of the US government... since the uploader appears to be the son of the person on the ID, it looks like a family source. 70.24.251.71 (talk) 07:22, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment Wouldn't the first version (the NASA badge) be proof enough that this is PD-USGov-NASA? --Stefan2 (talk) 12:43, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep but crop PD-USGov-NASA probably works. But, it is inappropriate for Wikipedia to have a governmental security badge image, which could be a security risk.  I have cropped to show just the photo.  The earlier revision should be deleted.--GrapedApe (talk) 12:59, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:28, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The CalTech badge is also troubling and likely inappropriate for use here: File:James H Trainor Caltech Badge 1.jpg.--GrapedApe (talk) 14:55, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Further comment was requested from Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents.--GrapedApe (talk) 14:56, 10 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep, cropping unnecessary but optional: Previous discussion at Possibly unfree files/2009 October 22. I agree with the comments there that, as an historical ID of low resoultion, there is no issue with hosting the file here. Whether to crop the photo or not need only be an aesthetic concern.  AJ Cham  15:27, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Amoureuse Brochure 2011.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:06, 11 March 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Amoureuse Brochure 2011.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Appears to be image of copyrighted works. Eeekster (talk) 09:31, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

I own the rights to this image. I am happy to release it to creative commons. talk — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.3.51.253 (talk • contribs) 2012-02-27T14:00:49
 * The problem is that it is a photo of magazines or books or something. As such, it is a derivative work. Permission is needed from the one who made the original books. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:21, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Zomato-screenshot.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  12:08, 11 March 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Zomato-screenshot.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * I tagged this as having no fair use rationale a couple of days ago. Today, a user changed the licence to GPL, but I can't find any GPL statement on the web site. Stefan2 (talk) 12:38, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:2000 art vin.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:04, 10 March 2012 (UTC)


 * File:2000 art vin.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Unused, without useful description + web resolution Bulwersator (talk) 15:25, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:V-8.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:04, 10 March 2012 (UTC)


 * File:V-8.gif ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * author "Rick Course" probably is not the single edit uploader Bulwersator (talk) 16:31, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:V Pozzo.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:04, 10 March 2012 (UTC)


 * File:V Pozzo.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Without date & author Bulwersator (talk) 16:32, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:V-42 poster.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  12:08, 11 March 2012 (UTC)


 * File:V-42 poster.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * No evidence of permission Bulwersator (talk) 16:33, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Vandalized Stalin, Fallen Monument Park, Moscow.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F6 by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:05, 7 March 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Vandalized Stalin, Fallen Monument Park, Moscow.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * No Commons:COM:FOP in Russia Bulwersator (talk) 16:41, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Vanessa Sarah 2.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F1 by AnomieBOT ⚡  15:33, 28 February 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Vanessa Sarah 2.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Orphaned, no proof that this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Bulwersator (talk) 16:42, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Vanessa Sarah 4.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F1 by AnomieBOT ⚡  15:33, 28 February 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Vanessa Sarah 4.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Orphaned, no proof that this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Bulwersator (talk) 16:43, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Vanessa Sarah.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:04, 10 March 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Vanessa Sarah.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Orphaned, no proof that this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Bulwersator (talk) 16:43, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Vasil Levski1.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:06, 11 March 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Vasil Levski1.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * "Freedom of panorama is limited in Bulgaria to informational "or other non-commercial purposes"." Bulwersator (talk) 16:44, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Varapodio-Stemma.gif
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:06, 11 March 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Varapodio-Stemma.gif ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * User talk:Attilios/Licenses: "Images from araldicacivica are released as Fair use." Bulwersator (talk) 16:45, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * See also Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Images from www.araldicacivica.it. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:46, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note The images from that web site are apparently licensed under the "Common 3" licence, whatever that means. See here: "Tutti i contenuti sono sotto licenza Common 3. In pratica le immagini possono essere usate liberamente purché si citi sempre la fonte." (All contents are under the Common 3 licence. Practically, the images may be used freely as long as the source always is quoted.) It is plausible to assume that "Common 3" means version 3.0 of some Creative Commons licence and the text stating that the contents may be used freely without any mention of commercial usage probably rules out the NC licences, but I wouldn't be too sure about the ND licences. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:21, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete License is now unfree: "ARALDICACIVICA by WWW.ARALDICACIVICA.IT is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione – Non commerciale – Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License". --MGA73 (talk) 17:54, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Vicentinaaranha2 p.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:04, 10 March 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Vicentinaaranha2 p.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Web resolution Bulwersator (talk) 16:51, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Vietnam Women's Memorial.JPG
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:04, 10 March 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Vietnam Women& ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * No FOP for statues in USA Bulwersator (talk) 17:23, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete "Copyrighted 1993". --Stefan2 (talk) 13:30, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Viewfield Obelisk.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep - too simple for copyright in the US; ineligible due to FOP in UK. Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:13, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
 * File:Viewfield Obelisk.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Without description, may be in the USA (No FOP for statues in USA) Bulwersator (talk) 17:27, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment The same image is available here as CC-BY-NC-ND with a later date and just some photoshopping. Is Wikipedia the original source or might the photographing task be unfree? The Geolocation web site claims that the obelisk is in Scotland where there is FOP. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:36, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep There is a Viewfield in Glenrothes, Scotland and here is a Google street image of a similar obelisk (not the same one). The sign in the photo says "Glenrothe". The metadata does not conflict. Obelisk is work of craftsmanship. I think we should accept this photo as claimed by the uploader. Thincat (talk) 16:45, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:GirlsGoneWild.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  11:08, 8 March 2012 (UTC)


 * File:GirlsGoneWild.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * No license nor source for the single cover. Saulo  Talk to Me 18:16, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Heart Strings 1.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:28, 28 February 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Heart Strings 1.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Not 50 year old as claimed  Ron h jones (Talk) 23:17, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I tagged it as a duplicate of File:Heartstrings Promotional Poster.jpg (which is used in a different article about the same TV series – those articles would have to be merged). --Stefan2 (talk) 23:45, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:HeartofDixieRailroadMuseumMed.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:04, 10 March 2012 (UTC)


 * File:HeartofDixieRailroadMuseumMed.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Frame suggests a photo of someone's else work. Orphaned file, uploader gone.  Ron h jones (Talk) 23:28, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.