Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 January 21



File:1023BOBFM.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:09, 7 February 2012 (UTC)


 * File:1023BOBFM.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Discussion on commons, should be deleted here too. Taged with NotMovedtoCommons  Ebe 123  → report on my contribs. 00:01, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * No need to delete here since it looks like something which is in the public domain in the United States. It just shouldn't be on Commons since it probably isn't in the public domain in the source country. This is already indicated by the PD-ineligible-USonly template. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:41, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Hanoi Montage.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:07, 4 February 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Hanoi Montage.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hanoi Montage.jpg. This is the 21 March 2011 file. Stefan2 (talk) 00:38, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Carly Foulkes as T-Mobile Girl.jpeg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:07, 4 February 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Carly Foulkes as T-Mobile Girl.jpeg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This nonfree image of Carly Foulkes as the T-Mobile girl could be replaced by a free image of the actress. While she is well known in this outfit, I dont think we can use a nonfree image of an actor in their part. If we can, then the ONLY articles this image can appear on is either the T-Mobile article or her. right now its on a t mobile product article. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:31, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:GolCayasso.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:07, 4 February 2012 (UTC)


 * File:GolCayasso.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Orphaned Image. Uploader claims he owns the rights to this photo since it is a 'family photo.' I think this is at least disputable, but in my opinion it is a copywritten photo. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда .  15:30, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Golden Cygnet.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:07, 4 February 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Golden Cygnet.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Orphaned image. Uploader claims that s/he made this photo, but upon looking at his contribution history, s/he has made a lot of questionable edits.  I believe that this image copyrighted. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда .  15:37, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mukta ram acharya.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:07, 4 February 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Mukta ram acharya.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Orphaned image description says its source is Nepalinews (www.nepalinews.com.np) but there is no proof of use. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 16:56, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Nagazi birth place.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:07, 4 February 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Nagazi birth place.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Map made on the basis of a base map that's obviously not the uploader's own work, of unknown provenance. Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:02, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Gururavidassji.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:07, 4 February 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Gururavidassji.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).
 * Duplicate: File:ShriGuruRavidasJikijai.JPG


 * Stereotypical icon of an Indian guru; with multiple identical and near-identical matches on Google search. May or may not be public domain, but certainly isn't an original creation of the uploader as claimed. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:11, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * No need to delete certainly and commonly available not only all over the internet but anywhere even in public domains. The image is a part of free use license. 115.252.127.148 (talk) 16:08, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Can you provide some kind of proof of that? --Stefan2 (talk) 17:36, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.