Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 July 11



File:Rijeka Crnojevića.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 19 July 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Rijeka Crnojevića.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * User has a handful of contributions, with suspicious uploads of different quality. The User claims "Rijeka Crnojevića, self-made", but this image looks like it's taken from a website - it is obviously not taken directly from a camera (very bad quality). It has the same name as Commons/File:Rijeka Crnojevića.jpg, which is an image of the old bridge (under CC license), which should be added to Rijeka Crnojevića. Z oupan 01:43, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Gunsnroses002.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:27, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
 * File:Gunsnroses002.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This album cover appears to be in the public domain due to PD-textlogo; however, there is no indication that the original uploader owned the image. That would make this replaceable fair use in my opinion, but I would like to get some other thoughts.  Ryan Vesey  Review me!  16:39, 11 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep: If it is a PD image, which this is being composed completely of plain text, the uploader does not need to own the image. PD-ineligible or PD-text would be more appropriate as this is not a logo but an album cover. There was hardly any point in even listing it here. ww2censor (talk) 16:45, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The fact that the album is ineligible for copyright doesn't mean that the photo is ineligible to the extent of what I know. You cannot copyright the sky, but you can copyright a picture of the sky.  Wouldn't the copyright still lie with the photographer? Ryan Vesey  Review me!  16:49, 11 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep --Stefan2 (talk) 15:38, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Fusemail.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 19 July 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Fusemail.gif ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * File has contradictory source and licensing information: the Summary section claims that Fusemail owns the image and has "allowed its use", but the Licensing section claims it is in the public domain. Psychonaut (talk) 17:37, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Tainan jija.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 19 July 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Tainan jija.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Image as tagged as CC-BY but the summary claims it is for non-commercial use. It's not used in any articles so if it's determined to be a non-free image it should be deleted; otherwise it should be migrated to Commons. Psychonaut (talk) 18:11, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Shenlongfirst.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 19 July 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Shenlongfirst.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * No evidence of permission Morgan Kevin J (talk) 23:11, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.