Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 July 20



File:Tsutsugaki 1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:03, 29 July 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Tsutsugaki 1.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Photo of paintings --> derivative work. MGA73 (talk) 07:21, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ram Kishore Shukla12.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:03, 29 July 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Ram Kishore Shukla12.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Incorrect source information. The user has explained at my talk page on En Wikipedia that he took these images from family albums and does not know who actually took them. (He is User:Ballisticizer now, having lost his password to his former account.) As he possesses the images, but not the copyright, he does not have standing to license them. He has an admirable passion for documenting his relative's life, but I'm afraid it has already pushed him into some questionable practices with respect to our policies, as here, where he writes that he faked the date of publication of his own writing in order to be able to cite it as a reliable source. Even if he provides more complete source information, I worry that he may be similarly more motivated by a desire to see the material on the project than accuracy. He has already speculated on my user talk page that the photographer of these images "may be" an assistant of his grandfather's or a maternal relative. He doesn't seem to have any real information himself. See also Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Images by User:Alcides86 Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:35, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ktm duke 200.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:06, 22 July 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Ktm duke 200.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).

Deleted per CSD#F7; thanks for reporting it. Next time, a better way to report this kind of thing would be to tag the image with {{subst:rfud}} (i.e. di-replaceable fair use. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:40, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
 * WP:NFCC says "Non-free content is used only where no free equivalent is available, or could be created, that would serve the same encyclopedic purpose." Obviously a free photo of any motorcycle may be easily created. Dennis Bratland (talk) 21:05, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.