Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 July 4



File:Lucia Peka at work.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:03, 12 July 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Lucia Peka at work.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * photo of printed source; no source provided, therefore not possible to deterine (c) status Skier Dude  ( talk ) 03:46, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:The Artist in 1970 Show.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:03, 12 July 2012 (UTC)


 * File:The Artist in 1970 Show.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * photo of printed source; no source provided, therefore not possible to deterine (c) status Skier Dude  ( talk ) 03:47, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Lucia Peka at work in her New York studio, 1970.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:03, 12 July 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Lucia Peka at work in her New York studio, 1970.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * photo of printed source; no source provided, therefore not possible to deterine (c) status Skier Dude  ( talk ) 03:47, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Lucija Peka.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:03, 12 July 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Lucija Peka.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Obviously taken from old (1930's-40's) printed source, no source provided Skier Dude  ( talk ) 03:48, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:La Revue Moderne Dec 1968 cover.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:03, 12 July 2012 (UTC)


 * File:La Revue Moderne Dec 1968 cover.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * photo of magazine cover; no linkalble source provided, possible other license for this, but CC3.0 can't be verified Skier Dude  ( talk ) 03:49, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Davichi 24th Golden Disk Awards.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:03, 12 July 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Davichi 24th Golden Disk Awards.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * I can't identify an original source, but it's web-resolution, looks like a publicity shot, and uploader has a history of misunderstanding copyright issues. (ESkog)(Talk) 05:50, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Thine Antique Pen - Evil.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:47, 7 July 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Thine Antique Pen - Evil.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Very dubious copyright status. EXIF claims that it is from the 16th century and then it says that it is both copyrighted and out of copyright at the same time, and the copyright holder is claimed to be someone other than the uploader. I don't believe the claim that this is from the 16th century; it looks much more recent. Stefan2 (talk) 22:18, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * It seems to have a merged EXIF with another file. See the evil faces on my userpage. ⇒ T A  P  22:35, 4 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Probably TAP was just messing around in Paint.NET with another file, then reused the same window to make this. It'd be handy if a new version with the EXIF stripped off could be uploaded instead so as to not suggest that it's copyright to the Bridgeman Art Library. —Tom Morris (talk) 22:53, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:VIKTOR BOUT.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:03, 12 July 2012 (UTC)


 * File:VIKTOR BOUT.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Source link goes to a different image and is bsr. There is no way to verify the licence. Stefan2 (talk) 22:27, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:1993.WTC.BOMBING.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:03, 12 July 2012 (UTC)


 * File:1993.WTC.BOMBING.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The FBI source has images of 7 suspected people, without photo credit. Those photos were presumably not taken by the FBI (since the FBI are trying to find the guys). This is a different image from the same FBI web page, also without image credit. Since there is no reason to believe that the other images on the web page were taken by the FBI, we have to assume that this image also might have been taken by someone other than the FBI. Stefan2 (talk) 22:30, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:UCT for Games and Beyond research meetings.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:03, 12 July 2012 (UTC)


 * File:UCT for Games and Beyond research meetings.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Derivative work of Pac Man and of the source code to some computer program. Also a derivative work of a Powerpoint presentation, but the shown slide might not be eligible for copyright. Stefan2 (talk) 22:48, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:2012 derecho outages.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep, concern has be addressed. — ξ xplicit  00:55, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * File:2012 derecho outages.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Description suggests that it is a derivative work of "the AEP outage map from the Derecho". Stefan2 (talk) 22:56, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Regardless of derivation, the AEP outage map is not creative work and statistics cannot be copyrighted. I created this map myself and it does not include any pixels from the AEP map. Only statistics regarding their service territory. See Talk:June 2012 North American derecho. --Bowser the Storm Tracker  Chat Me Up 23:04, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Maps are creative works, so why wouldn't "the AEP outage map from the Derecho" be a creative work? --Stefan2 (talk) 06:43, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
 * No. It's a statistical map. Anybody can create a map using known statistics. Statistics are not created by the map maker, but rather are just edited into the map. AEP created an outage map, and I also created an outage map, but I never used any pixels from their map so because it's purely statistical, it cannot be copyvio. --Bowser the Storm Tracker  Chat Me Up 08:52, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm pretty certain you can't copyright numbers, although the source for those numbers should be cited. Presuming that this is the original, it's certainly not close enough in style to be a copyvio. I don't see a difference between this map and a good number of these free maps which plot out numerical information geographically. - Running On Brains (talk) 07:44, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The map is derived from File:USA Ohio location map.svg, so it isn't properly licensed however that can be repaired though I don't know the correct templates for doing so. --Matthiasb (talk) 22:03, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
 * ✅. I just copied the template from the other one. I believe it is correct now. If it isn't, I ask that someone else correct it for me as I do not know how if this isn't correct. --Bowser the Storm Tracker  Chat Me Up 15:01, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Richardgoldberg3.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:03, 12 July 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Richardgoldberg3.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Licensed as PD US Gov, but the source is oh internet. Summary says it is "tagged as free on multiple sites and because it is in Googles cache is listed as being a photo taken, seized, or otherwise owned by the US Government" which makes no sense. Photo is likely unfree. The Garbage Skow (talk) 23:57, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.