Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 June 3



File:SJClarkson.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 11 June 2012 (UTC)


 * File:SJClarkson.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * File was licensed as non free, and was changed to CC 2.0 after this discussion. No proof the photo is in the public domain. We hope (talk) 02:41, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The photo has also been changed by the uploader after the above-mentioned discussion. Still no proof either of them are PD. We hope (talk) 02:45, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The revision of the photo can be found at the Heroes wiki. I am about to add the same attribution as from that wiki. Bleakgh (talk) 18:08, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * A photo used elsewhere does not prove it is public domain. Many photos which are under copyright are used under Fair Use.  They are copyrighted and able to be used in this manner, but are not public domain-free of copyright. Wikipedia's NFCC doesn't allow fair use photos to be used for living persons. We hope (talk) 19:38, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Unger press.jpeg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:08, 3 June 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Unger press.jpeg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * I cannot see where on the linked source it is released under creative commons sharealike. I can see copyright statements though. Peripitus (Talk) 10:36, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, evidently no free release, and in fact not even an indication that the blog in question owns the copyrights in the first place. Note that this was uploaded with the Upload Wizard, and uploaders in that process receive very clear instructions how to link to a page that contains an explicit licensing statement. If they then link to a page that doesn't contain one, this can be taken as prima facie evidence that no license exists, so these cases can be treated as F9 speedies. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:58, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Rudy Eugene mugshot Miami-Dade County.tiff

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep, this is PD-FLGov. — ξ xplicit  00:39, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
 * File:Rudy Eugene mugshot Miami-Dade County.tiff ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * listed as public domain and sourced to Miami-Dade Police Dept. Though US Federal govt images are PD, I'm not convinced this is the case for local police departments. Peripitus (Talk) 11:01, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * This has been changed to a fair use rational given the subject is dead, the file irreplaceable, and of no commercial value, and the attack was committed with the mouth. μηδείς (talk) 01:58, 5 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:09, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep PD-FLGov. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:25, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ronald Poppo, 2004 Mugshot.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep, no longer ineligible for deletion through this venue. Consider WP:FFD. — ξ xplicit  00:39, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
 * File:Ronald Poppo, 2004 Mugshot.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Miami-Dade county Florida Mugshot - listed as public domain. I can't see where this local police image became PD...unlike federal shots. Peripitus (Talk) 12:23, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * This has been changed to a fair use rationale given that the subject's face, which has been maimed in a notorious attack and is irreplaceable, has been commented on in the article. μηδείς (talk) 02:00, 5 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:09, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Famous one.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 11 June 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Famous one.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * I doubt that the portraits that feature in this montage are all either free-licence or in the public domain. The file description page does not identify those photographed (which considerably reduces its usefulness) and the file is not used in any articles (which may well constitute unjustified use of non-free material).  Super Mario  Man  12:26, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, no source Cambalachero (talk) 22:54, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:GSDhillon2.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 11 June 2012 (UTC)


 * File:GSDhillon2.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Source provided as "Shivpuri Image", the digitization is by the uploader, unless evidence that the photographer has released this is provided, this ought to be deleted. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  14:11, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment The editor now left me this note stating that they took the image, it's the third change to the source of the image now. See also this CCI. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  08:57, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Gradual Release of Responsibility Instruction Structure.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 11 June 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Gradual Release of Responsibility Instruction Structure.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The mere fact that something is used on a number of websites does not make it public domain- this picture features a prominent copyright notice. I advise that it is replaced with a user-drawn diagram that can be released under a free license. J Milburn (talk) 15:54, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Fisher and Frey Homework Checklist.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 11 June 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Fisher and Frey Homework Checklist.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Source is clearly copyrighted and non-free. J Milburn (talk) 15:59, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Bishop Anthony Fernandes.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 11 June 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Bishop Anthony Fernandes.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Image clearly taken from elsewhere. Uploader has not responded to questions about it. J Milburn (talk) 16:10, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Bishop Isidore Fernandes.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 11 June 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Bishop Isidore Fernandes.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Image clearly taken from elsewhere. Uploader has not responded to questions about it. J Milburn (talk) 16:10, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Amini Family.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 11 June 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Amini Family.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Tagged as "There is no evidence this was published in the state newspaper, and this image may not have been published until recently" Bulwersator (talk) 18:25, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Colonia-dublan-pajarito.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:09, 7 June 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Colonia-dublan-pajarito.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Web resolution, user with 7 edits... Bulwersator (talk) 18:56, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I am the owner of the photo. I took it with my own camera. I thought I already released copyright when I uploaded the photo. It says so right on the File's page.  If there is anything else I need to do to make this any more clear, please tell me.  Troy Bowman (talk) 17:39, 6 June 2012 (UTC) Troybowman (talk) 17:41, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh, a user with 7 edits is questionable, eh? I'm a valid contributor.  I just rarely if ever have the audacity and overconfidence required to contribute to Wikipedia.  And things like this just prove the reasoning behind my hesitance.  Surely you have better reasons for calling copyright into question. Troybowman (talk) 17:47, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
 * If "web resolution" is a big deal to you, I've uploaded the original in all of its dated 2001 digital-camera 1152x864 glory. It is skewed, but at least it will reduce your unfounded "web resolution" suspicion. Troy Bowman (talk) 21:30, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks, now it is clear that it is not grabbed from random website - file is copied to CommonsBulwersator (talk) 22:13, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.