Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 October 23



File:PostYourBook.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 30 October 2012 (UTC)


 * File:PostYourBook.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * OTRS >30 days old. OTRS queue checked for the file name and no hits.  Ron h jones (Talk) 00:35, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Queen's Hotel French Restaurant.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 30 October 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Queen& ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * OTRS >30 days old. OTRS queue checked for the file name and no hits.  Ron h jones (Talk) 00:36, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Queen's Hotel lobby.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 30 October 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Queen& ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * OTRS >30 days old. OTRS queue checked for the file name and no hits.  Ron h jones (Talk) 00:37, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Queens Hotel detail.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 30 October 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Queens Hotel detail.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * OTRS >30 days old. OTRS queue checked for the file name and no hits.  Ron h jones (Talk) 00:37, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ray Still oboist 1979.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 30 October 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Ray Still oboist 1979.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * OTRS >30 days old. OTRS queue checked for the file name and no hits.  Ron h jones (Talk) 00:38, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Richard Brooks on set with typewriter.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 30 October 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Richard Brooks on set with typewriter.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * OTRS >30 days old. OTRS queue checked for the file name and no hits.  Ron h jones (Talk) 00:42, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Riding Through One Horse Gap.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 30 October 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Riding Through One Horse Gap.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * OTRS >30 days old. OTRS queue checked for the file name and no hits.  Ron h jones (Talk) 00:42, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Risclua logo.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 30 October 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Risclua logo.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * OTRS >30 days old. OTRS queue checked for the file name and no hits.  Ron h jones (Talk) 00:44, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Royal Mail Bunty Stamp.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 30 October 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Royal Mail Bunty Stamp.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * OTRS >30 days old. OTRS queue checked for the file name and no hits.  Ron h jones (Talk) 00:45, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Royal Victoria Station Hotel Sheffield.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 30 October 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Royal Victoria Station Hotel Sheffield.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * OTRS >30 days old. OTRS queue checked for the file name and no hits.  Ron h jones (Talk) 00:47, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:The Hiker by Kitson, Kansas City edition.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 30 October 2012 (UTC)


 * File:The Hiker by Kitson, Kansas City edition.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * OTRS >30 days old. OTRS queue checked for the file name and no hits.  Ron h jones (Talk) 00:54, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * This file was given to me by the photographer with all the usual understandings. I'll start tracking those down. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 15:59, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Actually, I have changed my mind. I obviously do not have what it takes to solicit photographs from folks outside the wikipedia community and have it work out according to the rules. I will comfortably let this shot go and stop doing this so you all can focus on more significant stuff. Carptrash (talk) 17:38, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:The Mane- 3 star V1.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 30 October 2012 (UTC)


 * File:The Mane- 3 star V1.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * OTRS >30 days old. OTRS queue checked for the file name and no hits.  Ron h jones (Talk) 00:57, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Only Angels.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: converted to non-free. SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:40, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
 * File:Only Angels.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).

Non-free use rationale
 * PD claim would only apply to still photographs and this is a screen capture from a DVD. Non-free license tag is also present but lacks fair use rationale. Eeekster (talk) 01:37, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Are you reading the right section? See: File:Only Angels.jpg Notation:
 * Description      = Cropped screenshot from the film Only Angels Have Wings.
 * Source           = Only Angels Have Wings (film) DVD (1939), screen capture made using Snap N' Drag software
 * Article          = Only Angels Have Wings
 * Portion          = screen
 * Low resolution   =
 * Purpose          =
 * Replaceability   =
 * Other information = Bzuk (talk) 03:07, 23 October 2012 (UTC).
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:55, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Japollonia in 2012.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 30 October 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Japollonia in 2012.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Source is a fan page. While the fan page is CC licensed there is nothing to indicate the photo is. Eeekster (talk) 01:39, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Russell Means.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 30 October 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Russell Means.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * PD tag with nonsense for reasoning. Eeekster (talk) 01:41, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:3,000 reverts fixed.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 30 October 2012 (UTC)


 * File:3,000 reverts fixed.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Content from Quick Meme appears under a DCMA safe harbour agreement. I see no evidence that the dinosaur graphic is actually in the public domain.. Stuart.Jamieson (talk) 05:53, 23 October 2012 (UTC)


 * further: Quickmeme license their own content under a NC licence in their terms and conditions so still not compatible with wikipedia. Stuart.Jamieson (talk) 08:15, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Abul Kalam Azad.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 30 October 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Abul Kalam Azad.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Copyright expiration needs to be verified Eeekster (talk) 07:28, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Delete as file uploader. Uploaded a proper version on Commons anyway.—indopug (talk) 11:21, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete This is still copyrighted in the United States. See also Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Abul Kalam Azad.jpg. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:51, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:ManKri.png
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 30 October 2012 (UTC)


 * File:ManKri.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This appears to be a professionally made image. It does not appear on the claimed Picasa page, but it does appear elsewhere all over the Internet (see ), including, for example, a forum post made in early 2010, well over a year before it was uploaded here (and at a higher resolution than the image here, too). —Bkell (talk) 13:50, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:E16A1 of 634th NAG in Sep-1944.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:05, 31 October 2012 (UTC)


 * File:E16A1 of 634th NAG in Sep-1944.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The source is listed as Sekai no Kessakuki "Nihon Kaigun Suijō Teisatsuki" (世界の傑作機『日本海軍水上偵察機』). Amazon lists this as published in 1996. This is not enough; a PD-Japan-oldphoto requires publication without a copyright notice before 1 March 1989 or publication without renewal before 1964 in order to be in the public domain in the United States. For what it is worth, the 1996 publication might be the first time the photo was published, and in that case, the photo is copyrighted in the United States until the end of 2064. The photo is, on the other hand, in the public domain in Japan. The rule of the shorter term is not used in the United States, so a Japanese photo might be copyrighted in the United States while being in the public domain in Japan. See Commons:COM:HIRTLE for details. Stefan2 (talk) 17:47, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Before you make a complaint to me, you should think about the photographer of that photo. This photograph was photographed in September 1944 by a Japanese Navy airmen. If you have a question about the copyright of the photograph, you must prove that the photographer is a civilian. GOODBYE. Mystia Lorelei (talk) 06:14, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The United States copyright status of a Japanese photo from 1944 only depends on whether the photo was published before 1 March 1989 without a copyright notice or before 1 January 1964 without a copyright renewal. For that, it is necessary to identify a publication before 1 March 1989 and inspect that publication to determine if it complies with US formalities or not. The United States copyright status does not depend on whether the photographer was a civilian or not. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:16, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

（根拠: 法文） 旧著作権法 （明治32年3月4日法律第39号、最終改正昭和44年法律第82号） 1899年（明治32年）7月15日施行、1971年（昭和46年）1月1日廃止 第二十三条【保護期間－写真著作物】 1.写真著作権ハ十年間継続ス 2.前項ノ期間ハ其ノ著作物ヲ始メテ発行シタル年ノ翌年ヨリ起算ス若シ発行セサルトキハ種版ヲ製作シタル年ノ翌年ヨリ起算ス 3.写真術ニ依リ適法ニ美術上ノ著作物ヲ複製シタル者ハ原著作物ノ著作権ト同一ノ期間内本法ノ保護ヲ享有ス但シ当事者間ニ契約アルトキハ其ノ契約ノ制限ニ従フ 第五十二条 3. 第二十三条第一項中十年トアルハ当分ノ間十三年トス" Thus, for this photo, copyright expired on December 31, 1958. Do as you like. But, for Japanese old photo, I just act in accordance with the old law in Japan. Mystia Lorelei (talk) 16:01, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The photo did, indeed, enter the public domain in Japan in the 1950s. However, Japanese law only applies in Japan (and Europe and some other places), but Wikipedia is hosted in the United States. The copyright law of the United States says something different about Japanese photos from 1944. Check Non-U.S. copyrights: a Japanese photo from 1944 may still be protected by copyright in the United States because of the third point in the test. Essentially, this means that a Japanese photo from 1944 has to be treated in the same way as a United States photo from 1944. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:30, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * A lot of Japan old photos uploaded in the wikimedia commons. You should add a tag to ALL Japan old photos. Laos is not Japan. Turkmenistan is not Japan also. For old photos, the new law does not apply. Anymore, I do not want to debate with vandalism. So I say once again. "GOODBYE". Mystia Lorelei (talk) 19:04, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry, wrong section. It's Non-U.S. copyrights. It's confusing when there are multiple sections with the same name on the same page. See:

Was the work published after January 1, 1923 but before the effective date of copyright relations between the source country and the United States? YES: The work is in the public domain in the United States. NO: The work should be assumed to be protected by U.S. copyright. It should only be used on Wikipedia if it falls within the fair use policy.
 * In this case, the answer to the question is "NO". However, unless the first publication was after 1988, then it is usually fine as PD-URAA. However, please check Commons:COM:HIRTLE: "Works Published Abroad After 1 January 1978: 1 March 1989 or later: Published without copyright notice, and in the public domain in its source country as of URAA date: Use the US publication chart to determine duration". According to the US publication chart: "Works Registered or First Published in the U.S.: 1 March 1989 through 2002: Created before 1978 and first published in this period: The greater of the term specified in the previous entry or 31 December 2047". That is, if this was first published in 1996, it is copyrighted until at least 31 December 2047. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:56, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:WIKI CG 04.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 30 October 2012 (UTC)


 * File:WIKI CG 04.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * from http://www.actwon.com/cg/ap/photos_02.htm which states "These Photos are Not For Sale - Not to be copied - Not to be used by anyone else - Not to be used on any other page, etc... - They are for Personal Use and Enjoyment Only" - 92.40.20.248 (talk) 22:05, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment Based on username of uploader (User:ACT1) and name of website (actwon) and editing habits of the user, I'm inclined to agree that the photo is most likely made by the user as claims, but published elsewhere first, and with the user not fully understanding the legal complexities behind the copyright problem here, i.e. place of first publication and associated copyright status at place of first publication. I've alerted the user to WP:IOWN regarding previous publication of owned/created material so that they, if they are so inclined, can sort the problem out.  Ravendrop 00:03, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.