Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 October 24



File:NSCPAHL.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:05, 31 October 2012 (UTC)


 * File:NSCPAHL.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This is either a copyright violation as an official logo or something the user made up in which case it lacks encyclopedic value. Eeekster (talk) 01:28, 24 October 2012 (UTC)


 * To dispute Eeekster's contention, this is the seal of a public school entirely funded by taxpayer dollars. This logo was created by a government agency. By definition, original images created and funded by the government are public domain Count de Chagny 00:39, 26 October 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Comte de Chagny (talk • contribs)
 * Original images created and funded by the United States federal government are in the public domain. This was maybe created by a state or city government instead? In either case, it is unlikely that the logo was designed by the uploader, so the current information is wrong. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:45, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:ExchanghibitionBank-AmsterdamCentralStation.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:05, 31 October 2012 (UTC)


 * File:ExchanghibitionBank-AmsterdamCentralStation.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Image found here under this copyright notice, subject to these additional terms, and under a message saying "Contact before use". No evidence of CC BY-SA permission or compatibility. TheFeds 04:34, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:CeremonialCertificate.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:05, 31 October 2012 (UTC)


 * File:CeremonialCertificate.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Derivative work of the certificate, which is likely copyrighted and not available under a free license. David  1217  What I've done 05:04, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Pollak.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:05, 31 October 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Pollak.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Image listed as GFDL in 2006, but there are no copyright notifs at the base URL provided. Note uploader is an SPA (history). czar   &middot;   &middot;  06:16, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:The building process of a landmark in Brussels.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:03, 26 October 2012 (UTC)


 * File:The building process of a landmark in Brussels.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Invalid PD reason. Stefan2 (talk) 14:12, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Building Hilton Hotel Brussels.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:05, 31 October 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Building Hilton Hotel Brussels.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Dubious own work: looks like a postcard or something. Strange watermark. Stefan2 (talk) 14:13, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The watermark is http://www.herpain.be/en/index a Belgian construction company, presume from the same website although I could find it. MilborneOne (talk) 20:05, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Band bw 1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:05, 31 October 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Band bw 1.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:BlackRose uk band promo.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 14:42, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Blessed Nicolas Barre.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:05, 31 October 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Blessed Nicolas Barre.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * It's not clear if this is a modern illustration or if it was already made in the 17th century. Stefan2 (talk) 14:46, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:PP-ZDK- embraer.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:05, 31 October 2012 (UTC)


 * File:PP-ZDK- embraer.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Sourced from the flikr page of the San Diego Air and Space Museum Archives where it is marked as No known copyright restrictions. Following the explantion link it makes clear that the release of the image is actually non-free - The Museum's images that are part of The Commons are marked "no known copyright restrictions," indicating that the Museum is unaware of any current copyright restrictions on the works so designated, either because the term of copyright may have expired without being renewed or because no evidence has been found that copyright restrictions apply. The images shared as part of The Commons are for personal research and enjoyment...it is the policy of the San Diego Air and Space Museum to charge licensing fees for commercial use of these images MilborneOne (talk) 19:52, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ischiopagus Tripus conjoined twins.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:05, 31 October 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Ischiopagus Tripus conjoined twins.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * From a US government website, but doesn't seem to be PD-USGov. No evidence of permission for cc-by. Stefan2 (talk) 20:25, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:The Static Jacks at Portsmouth Guildhall - Feb 2012.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:05, 31 October 2012 (UTC)


 * File:The Static Jacks at Portsmouth Guildhall - Feb 2012.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Appears outside Wikipedia at numerous places (e.g. here), but all copies have a lower resolution. Stefan2 (talk) 21:54, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:HugoCrosthwaite.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep Clarkcj12 (talk) 19:47, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
 * File:HugoCrosthwaite.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).

Vcfineart (talk) 23:00, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Also on Facebook in smaller resolution. Stefan2 (talk) 22:17, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Van Cleve Fine Art represents the artist, Hugo Crosthwaite. This image of the artist is used on the artist's Facebook page, which is also managed by us.  Crosthwaite took this photograph himself, and has given us full permission to use this image on Wikipedia as well as other press and web pages.
 * Approved OTRS ticket under 2012102410012007 to be licensed under the terms of the CC-BY-SA-3.0 and GFDL-1.3 license. So I will close this discussion. --Clarkcj12 (talk) 19:47, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Nemo Submarine Voyage.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:05, 31 October 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Nemo Submarine Voyage.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Invalid PD reason. Stefan2 (talk) 22:56, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Exists on Flickr as CC-BY-NC-ND. Is this the earliest copy of the file? --Stefan2 (talk) 00:55, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Uploaded by a user whose past conduct suggests that he doesn't understand, or care about, niceties such as copyright. The user does divulge that the image comes from Wikimapia. I've located it there. Wikimapia's ToS are here. I quote: F. All User Submissions of all users and all Wikimapia Data are freely available for commercial and non-commercial use under Creative Commons license Attribution-ShareAlike through WikiMapia website, WikiMapia API and other current or future WikiMapia services. /// G. Public use of Wikimapia Data and it's derivatives requires special conditions: /// a. Link to Wikimapia data original url, if viewed from any web browser /// b. Mention of "Wikimapia.org" (with a link to http://wikimapia.org, if viewed from any web browser). The Flickr page says This photo was taken on July 10, 2007. The Wikimapia page says renkessler uploaded 7 years ago. Ergo, the photo was taken about two years after it was uploaded. Or just possibly the Flickr "photographer" merely ripped it off from elsewhere. -- Hoary (talk) 01:59, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Wikimapia says that it was uploaded 7 years ago, but an HTTP request to the file suggests that it was last changed in 2008, which is less than 7 years ago. Something is fishy here: what is the original source of the image? --Stefan2 (talk) 12:07, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Good sleuthing, Stefan. It gets more amusing: If the WP article about it is to be believed, Wikimapia didn't even exist seven years ago. As for the Flickr page, it links to a blog page that no longer exists but is here in Wayback. It does seem to me that "Tristan Tom" aka "PhotoTristan" is the copyright holder. The archived blog page says nothing about copyleft/right. The CC license on the Flickr page is one with the ("almighty") dollar crossed out, and thus the image is unusable here. -- Hoary (talk) 13:38, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, delete. The Flickr user seems to be the copyright holder, and the best licence available is CC-BY-NC-ND, which is not free enough. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:49, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, because (i) there's not yet any credible alternative to "Tristan Tom" aka "PhotoTristan" as the copyright holder, and (ii) "Tristan Tom" aka "PhotoTristan" releases it as CC-BY-NC-ND, which is inadequate for Wikipedia. -- Hoary (talk) 05:00, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:JE at the RCA.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:05, 31 October 2012 (UTC)


 * File:JE at the RCA.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * * This is a British work from the 1930s which is tagged as PD-URAA. However, British works have to be published before 1926 in order to qualify for PD-URAA. Obviously, a photo from the 1930s can't have been published before 1926, so the licence is wrong.
 * It says that this is unpublished and anonymous. This means that the copyright in the United States expires 120 years after the photo was taken. However, it says that the photo is from the 1930s, so it is not yet 120 years old. There is no evidence that the photographer has licensed this under a free licence. Stefan2 (talk) 23:06, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Photograph of Hugh Blaker in 1900.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:05, 31 October 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Photograph of Hugh Blaker in 1900.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * It says that this photo is unpublished and anonymous. As such, it is copyrighted in the United States for 120 years since it was taken. It says that the photo only is approximately 110 years, so it is still copyrighted. Stefan2 (talk) 23:08, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.