Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 October 26



File:A detail on Šiška Cultural Quarter, Ljubljana -- Do not copy this file to Wikimedia Commons.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: delete. A little fuzz over the copyrighted material does not render it free - it only makes the image unencyclopedic. SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:08, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
 * File:A detail on Šiška Cultural Quarter, Ljubljana -- Do not copy this file to Wikimedia Commons.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Shows the photos in detail. If these are considered thumbnails, they could only be used under the fair used conditions, which they do not meet. Eleassar my talk 09:46, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The photos have been now blurred to the extent that they can not be considered to be a proper reproduction of the originals, anymore. DancingPhilosopher my talk 14:17, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ljubljana Museum of Modern Art - Do not copy this file to Wikimedia Commons.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: delete. A little fuzz over the sculptures does not address the concern, and only serves to make the image unencyclopedic. The best solution would be to make a new picture that excludes the sculptures entirely and focuses just on the building. SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:08, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
 * File:Ljubljana Museum of Modern Art - Do not copy this file to Wikimedia Commons.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The sculptures are not de minimis and Template:FoP-USonly covers only architecture. Eleassar my talk 09:49, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The parts of the image where the sculptures are depicted have been blurred now so that their presence on the image can not be considered to be a proper reproduction of the sculptures, anymore. DancingPhilosopher my talk 14:20, 29 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep the current revision. The artworks have been blurred out and the outcome is presumably below the threshold of originality. I'm a bit uncertain about the old revision. I would argue that the main object here is the building and that the sculptures are unimportant to the image and thus de minimis. The purpose appears to be to show the building and not to show the sculptures. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:43, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ivan Fichev2.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:05, 2 November 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Ivan Fichev2.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ivan Fichev2.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 16:55, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Condom artistical depiction.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  21:12, 28 October 2012 (UTC)


 * File:Condom artistical depiction.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This does not appear to be the work of the uploader and gets a large number of hits on Tineye. Eeekster (talk) 21:49, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.