Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 April 23



File:Battle Hall Reading Room, UTSOA.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete. Deleted by
 * File:Battle Hall Reading Room, UTSOA.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Appears to be from http://www.soa.utexas.edu/files/support/whats_next_web.pdf (page 8). Stefan2 (talk) 15:00, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment The uploader decided to the deletion discussion instead of participating in it. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:21, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment On the file talk page, the uploader wrote that he has "Received permission from school to post image." This suggest that the image isn't own work at all despite his claim that it is own work. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:31, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Finn Hill Junior High.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:04, 7 May 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Finn Hill Junior High.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Was tagged for no-permission which got detagged in a vandalism revert, but this seems to be a photo of a text sign. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:56, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete The sign looks like PD-text, but it is a 3D photo of a 3D sign and it doesn't say who the copyright holder is, only that the copyright holder has released the image to the public domain. Without knowing who the copyright holder is, there is no way to verify this claim. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:57, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Imrankhansupportar.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete Danger High voltage! 14:25, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Imrankhansupportar.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Majority of photo is a poster  Ron h jones  (Talk) 19:38, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I took the picture at a rally in Rawalpindi, the poster is displayed alongside a road thus is not entitled to any copyrights. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wanishahrukh (talk • contribs) 19:43, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Commons:COM:FOP seems to cover any artistic work as long as it is permanently installed, but this isn't permanently installed, right? --Stefan2 (talk) 22:59, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
 * A poster on an advertising hoarding could be considered permanently installed, just that it's life isn't that long as it gets ripped down or pasted over within a fairly short time. It was still permanent for the life of the poster.  NtheP (talk) 22:20, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I believe that in general "permanent" means that you don't have a fixed date when you plan to remove it whereas "non-permanent" means that you do have a fixed date on which you plan to remove it. In the case of advertisements, you would presumably pay for the space for some limited time and then expect that the advertisement is removed once that time has passed. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:40, 25 May 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:ESAM FC 079.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete. No proof of publication prior to 1923 or copy is within Library of Congress collection. Deleted by
 * File:ESAM FC 079.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Declined speedy by an admin who retired immediately afterwards. No verifiable source for the image as required by WP:IUP- I did a thorough search at the Library of Congress, particularly in the Bain Collection, and while I did find some other photos of this person that I uploaded at Commons:Category:Ralph Johnstone, I could not find this photo or one like it. Kelly  hi! 21:12, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I found a few other PD-1923 ones:
 * http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=8_tS2Vw13FcC&dat=19101124&printsec=frontpage (go to what Google calls "page 5") which contains a cropped copy of one of the photos uploaded by
 * http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=djft3U1LymYC&dat=19101118&printsec=frontpage (front page)
 * http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=wZJMF1LD7PcC&dat=19101118&printsec=frontpage (go to what Google calls page 8)
 * As there clearly are PD images, fair use is no option if this can't be shown to be free. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:14, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.