Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 April 7



File:30podbay.jpeg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  21:13, 7 May 2013 (UTC)


 * File:30podbay.jpeg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Summary says "Images owned by Virtual World Entertainment", says "used with permission for educational and promotional purposes". Then the license provided is PD-own? I don't think that's right. Furthermore, I'm not sure this qualifies for fair use given the uncertain provenance and given my understanding that fair use imagery of places, like living persons, are generally not allowed without a compelling reason. These places still exist, thus a free replacement could be made. &mdash;/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 00:00, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:BonnieTyler backstageMunich2013.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  21:13, 7 May 2013 (UTC)


 * File:BonnieTyler backstageMunich2013.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Copies of this image are available online, in particular here, so I am questioning whether the uploader is actually the photographer and copyright holder to the image. Dianna (talk) 03:37, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Fx 800 vxr.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  21:13, 7 May 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Fx 800 vxr.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * High resolution copies of this image are available online, in particular here, so I am questioning whether the uploader is actually the photographer and copyright holder to the image. Dianna (talk) 03:39, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:SCCcrest.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep, with the addition of a fair use rationale. Dianna (talk) 13:51, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
 * File:SCCcrest.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Quite clearly a logo or crest Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:22, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Usbigymlogo.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  15:05, 17 April 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Usbigymlogo.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Clearly a logo. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:36, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:McCarthey Athletic Center.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Old revision deleted. Dianna (talk) 13:56, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
 * File:McCarthey Athletic Center.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The old revision appears to be a copyright violation. See Special:PermanentLink/548227018. Stefan2 (talk) 21:01, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Since the copyright holder did not respond to my request of using the original picture, I uploaded a picture that I took so that it would fit the requirements to be on Wikipedia. Rp0211  ( talk2me ) 21:59, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * New pictures should be uploaded with a new file name, not as a new revision of an old file, especially when they have different copyright status. -- Dianna (talk) 12:26, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:AmirkabirUniversity.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  15:05, 17 April 2013 (UTC)


 * File:AmirkabirUniversity.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * See Wikipedia talk:Copyrights/Archive 14. Stefan2 (talk) 21:09, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Mark as PD-Iran-unrecognised -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 06:52, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment this should be deleted through FFD not PUF, since under US-law, this isn't protected -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 06:52, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Cases like this are typically handled at PUF. Not sure if that practice should be changed. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:40, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:AmirkabirUniversityofTechnology.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  15:05, 17 April 2013 (UTC)


 * File:AmirkabirUniversityofTechnology.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * See Wikipedia talk:Copyrights/Archive 14. Stefan2 (talk) 21:09, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Mark as PD-Iran-unrecognised -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 06:46, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment this should be deleted through FFD not PUF, since under US-law, this isn't protected -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 06:53, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Cases like this are typically handled at PUF. Not sure if that practice should be changed. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:40, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Matthew Pratt Guterl.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F11 by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 17 April 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Matthew Pratt Guterl.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Claim of public domain is invalid. And the second version of the image is not at the claimed source. Eeekster (talk) 22:00, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Uptown Gold Line Map.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  15:05, 17 April 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Uptown Gold Line Map.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * marked as a work of federal government; actually a work of a local government agency -- Clorox ( diskussion ) 23:32, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment Since there aren't any tags for works of local governments, it's a safe bet to assume the use of a federal government tag us used as a substitute. ---User:DanTD (talk) 05:57, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * There is no tag for works of local governments simply because those works normally are protected by copyright. This image is unfree and replaceable, so it needs to be deleted. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:38, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:East End Green Line Map.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  15:05, 17 April 2013 (UTC)


 * File:East End Green Line Map.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * marked as a work of federal government; actually a work of a local government agency -- Clorox ( diskussion ) 23:32, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Southeast Purple Line Map.pdf

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  15:05, 17 April 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Southeast Purple Line Map.pdf ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * marked as a work of federal government; actually a work of a local government agency -- Clorox ( diskussion ) 23:32, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Downtown Houston Close Up.pdf

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  15:05, 17 April 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Downtown Houston Close Up.pdf ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * marked as a work of federal government; actually a work of a local government agency -- Clorox ( diskussion ) 23:32, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Question - What can be used in the place of the lack of local government tags? ---User:DanTD (talk) 05:58, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Freely available maps can be obtained from http://www.openstreetmap.org/ and tailored to suit the purpose using image editing software such as Paint or Photoshop. -- Dianna (talk) 12:23, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.