Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 December 13



File:Hikonyan at Hikone Castle.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  21:16, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Hikonyan at Hikone Castle.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Derivative work of a non-free character. Stefan2 (talk) 15:42, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I took the photo, and photography was explicitly permitted. In fact, the entire performance of this Mascot is a kind of photo-op. In the Japanese version of this page, there is also a photo of a similar event. Vlad b (talk) 11:06, 13 December 2013 (EST)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Kazan-Brando-Dean.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  21:16, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Kazan-Brando-Dean.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * PD-US-not renewed requires evidence of publication before 1964. The listed book is from 1988 (according to the entry for TX0002385690 at www.copyright.gov), which is too late. No evidence has been provided that this was published before 1988. Stefan2 (talk) 21:01, 13 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. No evidence the photo was published prior to its use in the subject's copyrighted 1988 autobiography. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 19:08, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Walter Matthau - 1973.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:16, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Walter Matthau - 1973.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * It says that this was published without a copyright notice before 1978, but it doesn't say where it was published without a copyright notice. On the obverse reverse, it clearly says "Copyright Universal Pictures." According to the Copyright Act of 1909, section 18, "That the notice of copyright required by section nine of this Act shall consist either of the word "Copyright" or the abbreviation "Copr." accompanied by the name of the copyright proprietor, and if the work be a printed literary, musical, or dramatic work, the notice shall include also the year in which the copyright was secured by publication." The text on the back is a literary work, and as there is no year, the copyright notice isn't valid for the text (provided that the text counts as a "printed" copy). However, the photograph is not a literary, musical or dramatic work, so the lack of a year does not put the photograph in the public domain in the United States. Stefan2 (talk) 21:20, 13 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Have a look at the original upload here-"Copyright Universal Pictures" on the back. We hope (talk) 22:46, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, that's what I meant to write, although I accidentally wrote "obverse" instead of "reverse". Sorry. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:05, 13 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom's accurate analysis. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 19:10, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Counterfeit clothes.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:16, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Counterfeit clothes.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Derivative work of the stuff printed on the clothes. Stefan2 (talk) 21:53, 13 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Clothing would not be a derivative of a logo or other artwork as they have no physical relationship. See examples in the U.S. copyright circular. --Light show (talk) 07:06, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
 * That's not what I wrote. The clothes themselves are ineligible for copyright, but the printed things on the clothes are clearly copyrightable. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:56, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Nintendo - 1970.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  21:16, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Nintendo - 1970.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Image is tagged as PD-textlogo but is the shape simple enough to meet that criteria? NtheP (talk) 22:20, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.