Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 December 14



File:Sanders at the Video Music Awards- 2013-12-13 20-14.jpeg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:04, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Sanders at the Video Music Awards- 2013-12-13 20-14.jpeg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Image is a press photo, taken from Erin Sanders's website, so it is not this user's own work.


 * Link to photo on erinsanders.com  Josh3580 talk/hist 00:36, 14 December 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:The cast of Zoey 101- 2013-12-13 20-18.jpeg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:04, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
 * File:The cast of Zoey 101- 2013-12-13 20-18.jpeg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Copyright belongs to Nickelodeon. See this page.  Josh3580 talk/hist 01:03, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:1930s John Adam Day.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  21:16, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * File:1930s John Adam Day.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Not PD in the United States (restored copyright). Earliest creation date given is 1931 so it could not have entered the public domain in the source country (UK) before 1996. January  ( talk ) 12:27, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
 * This is PD-UK because the author is unknown and it has not been published since 1935 and thus if it had a copyright, it fell into the public domain in the UK either in 2001 or 2005. For an item that was published, the law required any copyrighted image to be credited. This image was not credited. Neither the campaign's election agent nor the publishing company Underhill would have risked breaking the law by publishing a copyrighted item that was not credited. Therefore, I conclude that there was no copyright attached to this image Graemp (talk) 22:52, 14 December 2013 (UTC)


 * I'm not disputing that it's PD-UK, but Wikipedia's servers are in the United States so we can't treat it as free unless it is public domain in the US (please see WP:Non-U.S. copyrights and the bottom half of PD-UK). Since this image could not have entered the public domain in the UK any earlier than 2001, it was still copyrighted on 1 January 1996 and therefore has a restored copyright, making it copyrighted in the US for 95 years from publication. January  ( talk ) 17:20, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep: This image entered the public domain at the point of publication in the 1930s. Graemp (talk) 10:14, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Copyright protection in the UK at this time was automatic, images did not enter the public domain at the point of publication. January  ( talk ) 11:47, 20 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Unfree in the United States: not published before 1926. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:24, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Lufsig@ikeadec2013.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:04, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Lufsig@ikeadec2013.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This is poster art, and so I'm not sure that Freedom of Panorama applies. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:44, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh boo, I'm getting tired of this... I went around and photographed the shop decor for Christmas. The poster in that image isn't quite de minimis, I know, but it was incidental but happened to fit the purpose of the Lufsig article. --  Ohc  ¡digame! 15:38, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I agree that FOP doesn't apply because the primary subject of the image is a 2D poster. As an alternative, I've uploaded File:Lufsig IKEA Tottenham.jpg. This is slightly low-quality because I took it on my phone (wasn't really expecting to put it on WP/Commons when I took it). The plush toys are mounted to the store's fence railings so they can be construed as "on permanent display in a publicly accessible place" by any reasonable definition. Deryck C. 23:59, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
 * what i don't get is why a 2d poster enjoys that status for copyright protection while neither the toy itself nor the shop display, both of which can be considered artistic works, do not. just seems so  arbitrary to me. --  Ohc  ¡digame! 00:16, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete No freedom of panorama for 2D things in Hong Kong, and also no freedom of panorama for temporary exhibits. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:27, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Didn't I ask you kindly to stay out of my face?? --  Ohc  ¡digame! 04:24, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Majinnah8.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Majinnah8.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * iDangerMouse queried if the attribution given here is accurate. Mentioning that it seemed to be taken from a facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/pages/Abdullah-Hussain-Haroon/112367858836472 (and also http://twitpic.com/6i8ugt) A second opinion is requested. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:44, 14 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Additional, same user has raised concerns about other images in Category:Pakistani_public_domain_photographs possibly being taken from facebook and other sources, (as opposed to the claimed origins) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:51, 14 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia images are often re-used on social media sites, so images that were uploaded here a few years ago may well have been taken from us. I can't see the image on the Facebook page but the Twitter pic (based on "833 days ago" at the bottom right) seems to be more recent than our upload. January  ( talk ) 14:34, 20 December 2013 (UTC)


 * How old is this picture? Muhammad Ali Jinnah died in 1948, so not all images of him satisfy PD-URAA. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:52, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Maj Gen Abrar receiving HJ from C in C 1965 2.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  21:16, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Maj Gen Abrar receiving HJ from C in C 1965 2.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * 1965+50=2015, So this is not as far as I can see PD in Pakistan either. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:18, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.