Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 December 16



File:Torstein Horgmo at Dew Tour.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F6 by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:12, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Torstein Horgmo at Dew Tour.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * You can take a photo of him, so you can't use non-free work  Edgars2007  (talk/contribs) 05:57, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:RubyDay-1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Kept: OTRS permission received. --  TLSuda  (talk) 19:21, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * File:RubyDay-1.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * OTRS pending for more than 30 days. Kelly  hi! 15:33, 16 December 2013 (UTC)


 * OTRS has been sent another e-mail on Dec. 19, 2013 from photofrog verifying the copyright holder releases the image for the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. The copyright holder works for and is married to photofrog and gives his explicit release under the above stated CC license to use the image.  His contact information was sent with the e-mail on Dec. 19, 2013.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Art0078.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  21:16, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Art0078.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This pains me as the image is highly encyclopedic and no other images are present in the article hydathode, however: tagged PD-art but I don't see how this works. The file was probably not published before 1923 as the file is found on the subpage of this gentlement's university website: http://www2.puc.edu/Faculty/Gilbert_Muth/. Dr Muth's website states that he started work there in 1956. Whilst he is not clearly attributed as the author, it's on his subpage and the uploader has given no further information. Obviously meets the threshold of originiality. Where should we go from here? Second opinion requested. Acather96 (click here to contact me) 17:46, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.