Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 February 7



File:P.C.Bagchi in Indo-China 1922.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:09, 7 April 2013 (UTC)


 * File:P.C.Bagchi in Indo-China 1922.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The image doesn't look like a picture from a photo album, but rather like an illustration from a book. I don't think we have enough information to determine the copyright status of the picture. Dianna (talk) 05:02, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I sought some info from OTRS (search "Bagchi" if that gets archived) about this one and the one below and there didn't seem to be any available. Delete both barring new information. Chick Bowen 04:04, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Satyendra Nath Bose and P.C.Bagchi in Paris 1924.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:09, 7 April 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Satyendra Nath Bose and P.C.Bagchi in Paris 1924.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The image looks like it was copied from a book or magazine, and is likely subject to copyright. We don't really have enough information at this point to know for sure. Dianna (talk) 05:11, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:SAPKAL KNOWLEDGE HUB.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:02, 22 February 2013 (UTC)


 * File:SAPKAL KNOWLEDGE HUB.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This is clearly a logo Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:36, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Park City High School marching band on parade 1900's.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:02, 22 February 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Park City High School marching band on parade 1900& ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Mid 1930's image, so I am skeptical about this being a self taken image. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:40, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Savoia Marchetti SM79.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:03, 12 March 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Savoia Marchetti SM79.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Was still in UK Copyright as of 1996, so URAA applies to it's US status. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:48, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Logo for NBAD Private Bank (Suisse) SA.jpeg.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep, with the addition of a Fair Use rationale. Dianna (talk) 00:01, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Logo for NBAD Private Bank (Suisse) SA.jpeg.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Looks way too complex for PD-textlogo. Stefan2 (talk) 10:52, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I'm a beginner in contributions! I thought I used the right template. Finally I use this template now . Thanks for your feedback!
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:12, 8 February 2013 (UTC)


 * I just make the changes by adding rational. Thank you for your advice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swissjane (talk • contribs) 22:46, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Santo Niño de Cebu(2).jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:03, 12 March 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Santo Niño de Cebu(2).jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This is a work of artistic craftsmanship, but the uploader has not stated it's their artwork which is the subject of the image. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:13, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
 * In what way is it relevant if it is a work of artistic craftsmanship or not? This is only relevant for freedom of panorama in the United Kingdom and lots of former British colonies. However, Cebu is in the Philippines, which has no freedom of panorama at all. It is not clear when the underlying item was made or whether it is still protected by copyright. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:34, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Santo Nino de Cebu.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:03, 12 March 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Santo Nino de Cebu.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Copyvio:http://www.flickr.com/photos/8297325@N02/6726290929/ Original is All Rights Reserved. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:14, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Maybe it is the uploader's own Flickr account? Compare with the discussion immediately above, which was also uploaded to Flickr by the same user, although not until a couple of weeks after it was uploaded to Wikipedia. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:37, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The Flickr account self-identifies as Ellis Manuel Mendez, which is a pretty close match for their username on this wiki, User:Ellismendez. However, we don't know who made the object in the photograph, or how old it is. It might be under copyright -- Dianna (talk) 15:26, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Olivier Giacomotto.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  21:15, 31 March 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Olivier Giacomotto.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The image is available at many locations online, such as here and here. There's no metadata and my concern is that the uploader may not be the copyrightholder of this image. Dianna (talk) 23:20, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Deleted - the uploader has uploaded several promotional photos and not made any apparent effort to respond to the multitude of copyright notices on their talk page. --B (talk) 20:00, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:University of Wolverhampton historic image.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep. Dianna (talk) 21:07, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * File:University of Wolverhampton historic image.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * It's a shot of the University of Wolverhampton taken in horse and buggy days, likely uploaded by someone who works for the university. The claim to the file being "own work" strikes me as implausible. We need more information to determine the copyright status of the image. Dianna (talk) 23:30, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
 * As far as we are aware we obtained this image from the Wolverhampton Archive who gave us permission to use it. However, agree that the status should change (both in usage and in ownership). Can you recommend categories? Webteam-wlv 10:14, 8 February 2013 (GMT)
 * We need more information, please. Who took the photo? What year was it taken? Has it ever been published in a book, magazine, or newspaper? Thanks. -- Dianna (talk) 15:03, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't think we can answer all of these questions, so it would be best to remove it for now. Webteam-wlv 12:30, 12 February 2013 (GMT)
 * The metadata says "public domain" under copyright status. If the Wolverhampton Archive is either certifying that the image is public domain by virtue of age or is itself the copyright owner and releasing it into the public domain, that should be good enough for us. --B (talk) 20:03, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.