Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 January 15



File:Westlake High School.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 23 January 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Westlake High School.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Image looks to be a professional rendering, most likely not owned by uploader. Image is also used in one of the photos on the website for Matrix Engineering Group: http://www.matrixengineeringgroup.com/#!projects -- Тимофей ЛееСуда .  03:19, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Deford,MI.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:04, 15 January 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Deford,MI.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Implausible claim of own work. Image appears elsewhere online as http://metrodetroit-homes.com/post/128193/rochester-and-rochester-hills-michigan-a-great-place-to-live but does not qualify for CSD F9 since both the WP copy and that blog are dated 2009 -- impossible to tell which came first. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 03:19, 15 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete if you look at the http://metrodetroit-homes.com/post/128193/rochester-and-rochester-hills-michigan-a-great-place-to-live blog, there are comments on that page from 2007. I would say that alone predates the file on Wikipedia.  I see the copyright date on the bottom is from 2009, but that is most likely a generic copyright for the blog that goes on all of the pages, regardless of date. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда .  03:27, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh, you're right, the blog post itself has a date of 2007. I missed that! Deleted per F9. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 04:46, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Del Paso - -10 par 4 668.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 23 January 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Del Paso - -10 par 4 668.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Implausible claim of own work. Image exists elsewhere on the web at http://www.oliphantgolf.com/featured-project.html, but doesn't qualify for F9 as the earliest appearance in the Internet Archive is dated 2011, while this file is dated 2010. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 03:23, 15 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete the website that the image is currently on (but cannot easily be dated, is for the company that did the most recent construction on the Del Paso Country Club. It seems extremely unlikely it would be taken from Wikipedia for their use. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 03:34, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Cornelius P. Rhoades on the cover of TIME Magazine, June 27, 1949.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 23 January 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Cornelius P. Rhoades on the cover of TIME Magazine, June 27, 1949.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The source (http://www.time.com/time/covers/0,16641,19490627,00.html) clearly states "© 2013 Time Inc. All rights reserved." As such, the claim that "public domain because it was published in the United States before 1964, and its copyright was not renewed", is invalid. Mercy11 (talk) 15:26, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 * While the original cover is not actually copyright 2013, the PD claim is still false and so should properly be non-free. While many of the earlier issues of TIME have fallen into the public domain due to lack of renewal (see Talk:Time (magazine)/Archive 1), this is not one of them. VernoWhitney (talk) 16:10, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, as the nominating editor. My name is Mercy11 (talk) 01:48, 17 January 2013 (UTC), and I approve this message.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Osanippa River Bridge BF2142 Custom Map.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 23 January 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Osanippa River Bridge BF2142 Custom Map.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * File:Island Town.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * File:Toll booth1.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * File:Toll booth2.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Orphan images are only known edits of uploader. Look to be screenshots from unknown game. Possibly unfree.  Unknown true copyright. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда .  22:19, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Child Form of Ram at Orchha.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 23 January 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Child Form of Ram at Orchha.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * India has no freedom of panorama for two-dimensional works, so the original image likely enjoys copyright protection. -- Dianna (talk) Image is a duplicate of File:Child Form of Ram Orchha.jpg, listed directly below. 22:49, 15 January 2013 (UTC) Dianna (talk) 22:49, 15 January 2013 (UTC)


 * This is an image of Gods, these images are used for religious purposes freely Rajaramorcha (talk) 13:05, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete There is no evidence that the above claim is correct. Besides, a licence which only applies to religious purposes is insufficient. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:11, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Do you know what year the image was created? -- Dianna (talk) 15:52, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Child Form of Ram Orchha.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F1 by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:12, 18 January 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Child Form of Ram Orchha.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * India has no freedom of panorama for two-dimensional works, so the original image likely enjoys copyright protection. Image is a duplicate of File:Child Form of Ram at Orchha.jpg, listed directly above. Dianna (talk) 22:50, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 * This is duplicate, this file may be deleted Rajaramorcha (talk) 13:07, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Rashard Lewis Toy Drive 2.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 23 January 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Rashard Lewis Toy Drive 2.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Possibly unfree, other photos from same event by uploader have been deleted. Has Bowie Creative.com logo on the image.  Uploader is banned -- Тимофей ЛееСуда .  23:05, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Lenovo Yoga 13 retail display.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: delete. Even if converted to fair use, the image would fail WP:NFCC. Someone will have to take a picture of the device while it is off or running freely license software. — ξ xplicit  01:22, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Lenovo Yoga 13 retail display.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The image contains material that is copyright by Microsoft. I am not sure if usage in the article Lenovo IdeaPad Yoga 13 meets our non-free content criteria, and regardless it is not presently correctly templated and sized for fair use. Dianna (talk) 23:46, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I am the person who took the picture. How should it be templated and sized for fair use?Intermittentgardener (talk) 17:36, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Microsoft allows use of screen shots of their stuff, within certain guidelines, as outlined on the template . If you believe the image meets Microsoft's criterion for fair use (this I do not know; I was hoping my posting here would get us some guidance on this point) the image should be given a fair-use rationale via a template and reduced in size to 320 x 240 pixels per WP:Image resolution. -- Dianna (talk) 00:17, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I will do what you ask. Thank you very much. I just learned alot. Intermittentgardener (talk) 17:20, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.