Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 June 1



File:Vice Ganda controversy.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:11, 1 June 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Vice Ganda controversy.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Unclear source, but appears to be a photograph of a TV screen. Rights would obviously still be held by the rightsholder of the program. (ESkog)(Talk) 14:09, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Decorated chariot1, Udupi, India.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep Diannaa (talk) 21:42, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Decorated chariot1, Udupi, India.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * It says that this previously was uploaded to Commons, but the uploader has never uploaded any files to Commons, so if it was on Commons, then the authorship claim seems to be wrong.

If it was previously uploaded to Commons, then why was it moved here? If it means that it was deleted from Commons, then it might have been deleted as a copyright violation or something. There has never been any file on Commons under the indicated file name, so something is wrong. Stefan2 (talk) 18:36, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I uploaded the file twice on the same day, because, an error message appeared when I first uploaded the file. Immediately, I uploaded the same second time and may be I selected a wrong option, which created the above confusion. I myself took the photograph and I am confident that I have permitted the photo for free usage. I also confirm that I permit the photo to be used in wikipedia as a free usage.Rayabhari (talk) 11:54, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Drawing by Pfc. Gary Hodson of alleged aliens.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  19:12, 26 June 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Drawing by Pfc. Gary Hodson of alleged aliens.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Image appears to be some kind of cartoon drawing clipped from some unverifiable source. There is no evidence that this drawing is a work of the United States government. Claim is most likely fraudlent. Uploader's rationale they have "personally investigated" the image's origin honestly can't be taken at face value, given the extraordinary claims being made, e.g. a couple of scotch-taped drawings are supposedly the result of an "official" US Army investigation that somehow only ever got published in an unspecified issue of the Louisville Courier-Journal that no one can locate any evidence of. LuckyLouie (talk) 21:21, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:‪Drawing of aliens and spacecraft by Pfc Gary Hodson of US Army.jpg‬

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  19:12, 26 June 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Drawing of aliens and spacecraft by Pfc Gary Hodson of US Army.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Image appears to be some kind of cartoon drawing clipped from some unverifiable source. Claim is most likely fraudulent. There is no evidence that this drawing is a work of the United States government. Uploader's rationale they have "personally investigated" the image's origin honestly can't be taken at face value, given the extraordinary claims being made, e.g. a couple of scotch-taped drawings are supposedly the result of an "official" US Army investigation that somehow only ever got published in an unspecified issue of the Louisville Courier-Journal that no one can locate any evidence of. LuckyLouie (talk) 21:26, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.