Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 March 22



File:Abner Sibal.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  21:13, 7 May 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Abner Sibal.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The image came from Find-A-Grave, and is tagged as being a US Government official portrait. I see no evidence to back up this claim. It could be kept as fair use for the one article. Dianna (talk) 00:12, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
 * See also WT:NFC about Find a Grave and WP:NFCC. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:10, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Schematic diagram corner tube boiler.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete (ESkog)(Talk) 15:07, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Schematic diagram corner tube boiler.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Incorrectly templated image was published abroad in 1953. The uploader asserts the book was published without a copyright notice. Reviewing the image and the Hirtle Chart I am not so sure the image is PD. We need more information. Dianna (talk) 00:52, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you for bringing this picture to discussion. This picture I got to know about from a master thesis written in the year 1982 in Germany. In the thesis references this    picture is quoted from a German Engineers association(VDI=Verein Deutscher Ingenieure) Journal which was published in the year 1951 . Now I would like to mention one main point and two reasons so that the file should not be deleted. The VDI journal had this schematic diagram exactly the same as we see in this picture, which was actually the work of the inventor Dr. Henrich Vorkauf. Dr Vorkauf died around the years 1984 or 1985 I do not have the exact date but if it is necessary I can provide it in 1 day. I believe the copyrights expire within a period of 10 years after the death of the inventor (please correct me if I am wrong)).Reasons as to not to delete the file: 1. The inventor of the concept is already dead for more than 18 years and hence I would suggest it is available for PD. 2. The work was published later in the USA after the year 1977 and thats why it has the status published without copyright notice and it is freely usable in the PD I can provide further details and or answers to this discussion and any question regarding the copyrights.   Ghorpaapi (talk) 08:55, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
 * If the diagram was taken from a book or magazine published in Germany in 1951 it is not in the public domain. Your remarks imply that these are drawings filed with a patent application in Germany. Is that true? -- Dianna (talk) 21:58, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

here are the details .Patent number 2962004. files July 8 1953, ser no 366761. claims priority application Germany July 15,1952. Patented on Nov 29 1960 ( in the US). Ghorpaapi (talk) 07:15, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The immediate source for me where I got the diagram is a master thesis which I have mentioned above. The master thesis had the replica of this diagram and I have made the schematic diagram in the software AUTOCADD 2007. The concept was filed with a patent in Germany and later in the USA.
 * DeleteAuthor needed to have died 70 years ago, not 18 to be PD in Germany. This image is currently neither PD in US or Germany and is copyrighted.Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 06:02, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Working of corner tube boiler.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:06, 9 April 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Working of corner tube boiler.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Image from 1951 book published in Germany, incorrectly tagged as pre-1923. I don't understand why the image would be PD, and am posting here for more information. Dianna (talk) 01:06, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:The Coat of Arms of The Duchess of Cornwall.jpg.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:06, 7 April 2013 (UTC)


 * File:The Coat of Arms of The Duchess of Cornwall.jpg.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This is a heraldic crest, which are typically owned by the entity to which they are granted, or alternately to the College of Arms in London. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 07:54, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. This file can be seen at the British Monarchy's official flickr site, where the copyright tag is "All rights reserved". See also Prince of Wales' official site. DrKiernan (talk) 13:37, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Convert to fairuse Duchess of Cornwall -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 06:54, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
 * We can't do that because there is a free version of the arms on commons. Fair use does not apply when there are free files showing the same information. DrKiernan (talk) 07:15, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:'Harlem Shake, Postmortem of a Video Craze' Infographic.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep. Decision only relates to status of image in that it is not claimed as a free file, hnece question of being possibly unfree is not applicable. This is not an adjudication on whether it meets the NFCC.
 * File:& ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * I don't think this file is necessary Ho Tuan Kiet (talk) 10:26, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:09, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Simple Cell Receptive Field.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:06, 7 April 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Simple Cell Receptive Field.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The site the image comes from does carry a copyleft notice however the copyleft statement contains the following
 * Just make sure you comply with the following two conditions: you must not use the material for commercial purposes, and you must include the “copyleft” symbol in all versions of the material that you use

With this wording I'm not sure that the copyleft is sufficient. NtheP (talk) 21:41, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.