Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 March 9



File:Lek Kcira Kelantan.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:03, 21 March 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Lek Kcira Kelantan.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * May be uploader has the image and scanned it but unlikely he owns the underlying rights.  LGA talk  edits   01:25, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Brandon-Keener-2011.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:03, 21 March 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Brandon-Keener-2011.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Given the reduced size of the image, I would have to guess that this is not actually the user's own work. I had a look at Google Images lookup, but that was inconclusive. One site (whosdatedwho.com) makes this image appear to be a stock photo. Izno (talk) 03:14, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Arshad Warsi.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:03, 21 March 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Arshad Warsi.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Invalid reason given for claim of public domain and the uploader has a bit of a history. Eeekster (talk) 03:42, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Jolly Music.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:03, 21 March 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Jolly Music.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Movie poster very unlikely to be public domain and has a less than useful source of "www.google.com". Eeekster (talk) 03:45, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Crazyhead (band).jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:03, 21 March 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Crazyhead (band).jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * No evidence uploader is the copyright holder. Kelly  hi! 05:44, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:.baxter. live.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:03, 21 March 2013 (UTC)


 * File:.baxter. live.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Can't verify the PD claim due to cryptic source information. Eeekster (talk) 21:00, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Unlikely to be PD.  LGA talk  edits   21:37, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Illustration of orthomanual manipulation.tif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:03, 21 March 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Illustration of orthomanual manipulation.tif ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Lots of strange things here. The uploader claims that it was taken in 2004, yet he EXIF tells that it was taken in 2010. Low-resolution crops are everywhere on the Internet, for example here. Stefan2 (talk) 22:12, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Deleting admin note: this website says the image is from the Praktijk voor Orthomanuele Diergeneeskunde (Ortho Manual of Veterinary Practice). -- Dianna (talk) 03:14, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Abdelkader Taleb Omar.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep. Dianna (talk) 22:09, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Abdelkader Taleb Omar.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Everything made by www.webislam.com seems to be available under cc-by-sa-3.0, but it seems that this photo wasn't taken by Webislam. Posted to Webislam on 1 August 2010, but the image has been cropped from a different image which was posted to Blogspot on 30 July 2010. Stefan2 (talk) 22:22, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - No, the image had not been cropped, its the same. Also, finally the original file is from the Spanish newspaper es:Diagonal (periódico) (posted on 29 July 2010), wich puts all its content (with a few pointed exceptions) under a cc-by-sa 3.0 license. So I'm gonna change the source and type of license to make it fit. Regards,--HCPUNXKID (talk) 14:47, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mark Turner.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep. Dianna (talk) 22:14, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Mark Turner.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Prior versions had a copyright notice, other than username there is no indication that this is indeed licensed, the website linked to is not being updated nor does it have any proof.  LGA talk  edits   22:24, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. I see no reason to doubt the uploader's claim to be the photographer here. The watermark indicated that the photo is copyrighted, but nobody has ever claimed that this photo is not copyrighted—it's just licensed under GFDL/CC-BY-3.0. A watermark alone should not be reason to doubt an uploader's claim of authorship, nor should a link to the uploader's home page. —Bkell (talk) 03:42, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:LutonTown1914.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:01, 9 April 2013 (UTC)


 * File:LutonTown1914.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * It says that this is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before 1923, but it doesn't say where it was published, so there is no way to verify this claim. Stefan2 (talk) 22:50, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment are public display images "published" This is a team photo, so I would think it would be publicly displayed. -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 01:53, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete unless proof of its published nature can be shown as incorrectly licensed.  LGA <sub style="color:#8B0000;">talk <sup style="margin-left:-4ex"> edits   02:10, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment, the picture is a team photo of Luton Town, a provincial English football team, from about a century ago, so it seems logical to me to assume that the picture would have been first published around the same time it was taken (1913/14), in Luton. The club has always used local photographers and it seems illogical to me to imagine that this photograph would have been originally published anywhere but in Luton—most likely by the club itself or in one of the local newspapers. But we don't have proof for this, sadly. <b style="color:white; background:darkgreen">—<b style="color:white; background:darkgreen">Cliftonian</b> <b style="color:white; background:darkgreen">(talk)</b></b> 05:14, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 * It doesn't matter where it was published. The problem is that there is no evidence that it has been published at all. If it has never been published, then it is protected by copyright in the United States for 120 years since it was taken. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:55, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Giorgio Chinaglia 1975.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:01, 9 April 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Giorgio Chinaglia 1975.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Taken from it:File:Giorgio Chinaglia 1975.jpg. Claimed to be a photo from 1975, but there is no way to verify this claim. Unless taken before 1976, it is protected by copyright in the United States. Another requirement is that the photo must have been published before 1 March 1989 without a copyright notice. The image is obviously a scan from a publication, but it doesn't say which one, so it isn't possible to check when it was published or whether the publication carried a copyright notice. Stefan2 (talk) 22:56, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Maj Gen Pineda.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:01, 9 April 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Maj Gen Pineda.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The CAP website claims copyright to it's contents "Copyright © 2013 Civil Air Patrol National Headquarters. All Rights Reserved." this is at odds with the claim of PD.  LGA <sub style="color:#8B0000;">talk <sup style="margin-left:-4ex"> edits   23:01, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Jeremy blake.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:03, 21 March 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Jeremy blake.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).

Which is the original, as one must logically be incorrect? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:11, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Near identical image - File:Jeremy Blake.jpg is tagged as non-free.
 * Delete Later higher resolution copy: . Same resolution as on Wikipedia, predates Wikipedia upload: . --Stefan2 (talk) 23:34, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment Not sure on this, if as it says it was taken by his widow then it is reasonable to assume that the Fair Use image image is replaceable by a image taken and released by his wife. Are we better to seek ORTS confirmation on this one and delete the fair use version ?  LGA <sub style="color:#8B0000;">talk <sup style="margin-left:-4ex"> edits   23:45, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
 * How would we do that, now that his wife is dead? Do we have someone else whom we can contact? No e-mail address specified, but if the uploader died more than five years ago, I would assume that all e-mail addresses have stopped working anyway. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:50, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
 * opps, missed that.  LGA <sub style="color:#8B0000;">talk <sup style="margin-left:-4ex"> edits


 * Delete this one as not being able to verify licence and keep the fair use one.  LGA <sub style="color:#8B0000;">talk <sup style="margin-left:-4ex"> edits   23:53, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.